Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On 01/08/2016 12:24 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:33:01AM -0800, José Matos wrote: >> On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 06:56:12 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Yes file format freeze is before RC. Feature freeze will be before beta. >>> For discussion see: >>>

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 06:56:12 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Yes file format freeze is before RC. Feature freeze will be before beta. > For discussion see: > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=20151022164521.GA4654%40cotopaxi > .att.net > > Scott Hi Scott, apologies for

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:33:01AM -0800, José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 06:56:12 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Yes file format freeze is before RC. Feature freeze will be before beta. > > For discussion see: > >

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Le 05/12/2015 21:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: is it possible to implement the format change (which I feel is stable now) for 2.2.0 and implement the polished visible changes in 2.2.1 or 2.2.2? I am fine with this but I'd like

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 30/11/2015 10:59, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >Uwe will be away in two weeks. The last day he will be able to build an > >installer is December 11, which to me means we should plan on the last > >day being December 10, just in

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On 12/05/2015 04:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> is it >> > possible to implement the format change (which I feel is stable now) for >> 2.2.0 and implement the polished visible changes in 2.2.1 or 2.2.2? > > I am fine with this

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Le 05/12/15 22:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : is it possible to implement the format change (which I feel is stable now) for 2.2.0 and implement the polished visible changes in 2.2.1 or 2.2.2? I am fine with this but I'd like to get a +1 from someone else. Have we done this in the past? It

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Le 30/11/2015 10:59, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 29/11/2015 16:39, Richard Heck a écrit : I'd suggest beta in two weeks if we don't run into any serious problems, then see how that goes. If well, then we can shoot for RC in

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 29/11/2015 16:39, Richard Heck a écrit : > >I'd suggest beta in two weeks if we don't run into any serious problems, > >then see how that goes. If well, then we can shoot for RC in mid-January. > > This looks good to me.

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Le 29/11/2015 16:39, Richard Heck a écrit : I'd suggest beta in two weeks if we don't run into any serious problems, then see how that goes. If well, then we can shoot for RC in mid-January. This looks good to me. JMarc

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On 11/29/2015 01:26 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:13:46PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> >>> Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak >>> a écrit : What

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a > écrit : > >What stage(s) would you propose making shorter? > > All of them ? :) > > Seriously, we'll see what happens. We should go as

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:13:46PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > > Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak > > a écrit : > > >What stage(s) would you propose making shorter? > >

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Pavel Sanda wrote: > I agree with JMarc that we could be flexible WRT shortcuting the dates in > case things look good, but I also know that all plans we ever had for our > releases were delayed. Let's see :) Yes, the plans get always delayed. Therefore I'd like a schedule with about 3 weeks

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:04:42PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > I agree with JMarc that we could be flexible WRT shortcuting the dates in > > case things look good, but I also know that all plans we ever had for our > > releases were delayed. Let's see :) > > Yes, the

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:20:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule > >is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the > >state of our master branch is

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the state of our master branch is already relatively stable. alpha: tag and tar this week and announce this

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Le 11/11/2015 08:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the state of our master branch is already relatively stable. alpha: tag and tar this week and announce this

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> no major crashes. Unless we have major issues that need addressed and >> fixed prior to this major release, I think the general hope around is >> that we get an RC and even the actual release by the end

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Liviu Andronic wrote: > no major crashes. Unless we have major issues that need addressed and > fixed prior to this major release, I think the general hope around is > that we get an RC and even the actual release by the end of the year, > or perhaps very early next year. I do not think that 1.5

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:01:40AM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:20:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> >Below is a tentative

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:03:19PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 11/11/2015 08:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule > >is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the > >state of our master branch is

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >What stage(s) would you propose making shorter? All of them ? :) Seriously, we'll see what happens. We should go as fast as possible but not more. JMarc

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:20:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule >> >is slightly on the