On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 06:37:03AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 27.12.2019, 20:18 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Some variation probably makes sense depending on what the "..." are,
> > but
> > I wonder if some consistency would be welcome. On the other hand,
> > perhaps
Am Freitag, den 27.12.2019, 20:18 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Some variation probably makes sense depending on what the "..." are,
> but
> I wonder if some consistency would be welcome. On the other hand,
> perhaps too much consistency would make LyX too much like a robot
> instead of the
Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
i found the two tooltips Left-click to collapse the inset
Left-click to open the inset we have associated with collapsable
insets and float as quite annoying in the long term. it doesn't
bring any useful information, and it somehow resembles MS helps
like to get help
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
i found the two tooltips Left-click to collapse the inset
Left-click to open the inset we have associated with collapsable
insets and float as quite annoying in the long term. it doesn't
bring any useful information, and it somehow resembles MS
Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
i found the two tooltips Left-click to collapse the inset
Left-click to open the inset we have associated with collapsable
insets and float as quite annoying in the long term. it doesn't
bring any useful information, and it somehow resembles MS helps
like to get help push
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> hi,
>
> i found the two tooltips "Left-click to collapse the inset"
> "Left-click to open the inset" we have associated with collapsable
> insets and float as quite annoying in the long term. it doesn't
> bring any useful information, and it somehow resembles MS helps
> like
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
i found the two tooltips "Left-click to collapse the inset"
"Left-click to open the inset" we have associated with collapsable
insets and float as quite annoying in the long term. it doesn't
bring any useful information, and it somehow resembles MS
Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
i found the two tooltips "Left-click to collapse the inset"
"Left-click to open the inset" we have associated with collapsable
insets and float as quite annoying in the long term. it doesn't
bring any useful information, and it somehow resembles MS helps
like "to get help
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:21:44PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
The tooltips are back.
Does anybody know why?
Because Georg fixed it
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16981
Ah, I assume this is in a overwritten event handler
function. I've only searched for
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:21:44PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
>> The tooltips are back.
>> Does anybody know why?
>
> Because Georg fixed it
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16981
>
Ah, I assume this is in a overwritten event handler
function. I've only searched
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:21:44PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
The tooltips are back.
Does anybody know why?
Because Georg fixed it
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16981
--
Enrico
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:21:44PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> The tooltips are back.
> Does anybody know why?
Because Georg fixed it
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16981
--
Enrico
Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdel,
you forgot to remove tooltips-toggle from the UI files.
That's because I don't know much about UI files :-/
I will fix the
files in a minute...
Thanks,
Abdel.
Am Samstag, 14. Oktober 2006 14:38 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdel,
you forgot to remove tooltips-toggle from the UI files.
That's because I don't know much about UI files :-/
That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look up
the name in
Georg Baum schrieb:
That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look up
the name in src/LyXAction.C, and remove all occurrences of it in lib/ui
and lib/bind.
Even better, run
find . -name .svn -prune -o -type f -exec grep -i
somethingobsolete {} \; -print
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look up
the name in src/LyXAction.C, and remove all occurrences of it in lib/ui
and lib/bind.
Even better, run
find . -name
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look up
the name in src/LyXAction.C, and remove all occurrences of it in lib/ui
and lib/bind.
Even better, run
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look
up
the name in src/LyXAction.C,
Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdel,
you forgot to remove tooltips-toggle from the UI files.
That's because I don't know much about UI files :-/
I will fix the
files in a minute...
Thanks,
Abdel.
Am Samstag, 14. Oktober 2006 14:38 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Michael Gerz wrote:
> > Abdel,
> >
> > you forgot to remove tooltips-toggle from the UI files.
>
> That's because I don't know much about UI files :-/
That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look up
the
Georg Baum schrieb:
That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look up
the name in src/LyXAction.C, and remove all occurrences of it in lib/ui
and lib/bind.
Even better, run
find . -name ".svn" -prune -o -type f -exec grep -i
"somethingobsolete" {} \; -print
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Georg Baum schrieb:
> > That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look up
> > the name in src/LyXAction.C, and remove all occurrences of it in lib/ui
> > and lib/bind.
> >
> Even better, run
>
>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
Georg Baum schrieb:
That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look up
the name in src/LyXAction.C, and remove all occurrences of it in lib/ui
and lib/bind.
Even better, run
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> >
> >> Georg Baum schrieb:
> >>> That is a lame excuse ;-) It is very simple: If you remove an lfun, look
> >>> up
> >>> the name in
Andre Poenitz wrote:
The yellow tooltip box that pops up after hoveering over e.g. the width
field in the graphics dialog doesn't go away if the dialog is closed by
pressing Escape
Yep, here too.
I think there may be a list of problems with tooltips in a tabbed dialog.
E.g: when moving the
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The yellow tooltip box that pops up after hoveering over e.g. the width
> field in the graphics dialog doesn't go away if the dialog is closed by
> pressing
Yep, here too.
I think there may be a list of problems with tooltips in a tabbed dialog.
E.g: when moving the
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:34:56PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
John Levon wrote:
For tooltips it's not an option because the dialogs will differ, and
they are encoded in the .ui file, and I don't want the Qt tooltips to be
the George Bernard Shaw essays that xforms has. It would be
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 05:34:56PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > For tooltips it's not an option because the dialogs will differ, and
> > they are encoded in the .ui file, and I don't want the Qt tooltips to be
> > the George Bernard Shaw essays that xforms has. It
Rob Lahaye wrote:
4) Why do many (xforms) dialogs not have tooltips yet? Is it only a matter
of not yet coded, or are there other reasons why to wait with
expanding the tooltips facility.
Not yet coded. I've done a few dialogs but didn't find the time to proceed.
I'm happy if you want to
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Rob Lahaye wrote:
4) Why do many (xforms) dialogs not have tooltips yet? Is it only a matter
of not yet coded, or are there other reasons why to wait with
expanding the tooltips facility.
Not yet coded. I've done a few dialogs but didn't find the time to
Rob Lahaye wrote:
I was wondering if it's a better idea to make another file in src/frontends
that has the tooltips and which will/can be shared by the frontends.
If this is a good idea, then what would be the best way to set it up?
You mean the text? Good idea. I don't know if this is
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Rob Lahaye wrote:
I was wondering if it's a better idea to make another file in src/frontends
that has the tooltips and which will/can be shared by the frontends.
If this is a good idea, then what would be the best way to set it up?
You mean the text? Good
On Saturday 17 August 2002 8:52 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Hi,
A few tooltips issues:
1) Graphics dialog.
The tooltips for the Graphics dialog work well, as long as I do not
move the Graphics dialog somewhere else on my display.
After moving the dialog, the tooltips text keeps
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:12:48AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Rob Lahaye wrote:
I was wondering if it's a better idea to make another file in src/frontends
that has the tooltips and which will/can be shared by the frontends.
If this is a good idea, then what would be the best
John Levon wrote:
For tooltips it's not an option because the dialogs will differ, and
they are encoded in the .ui file, and I don't want the Qt tooltips to be
the George Bernard Shaw essays that xforms has. It would be possible for
Thank God that it is not James Joyce ;-)
what's this
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> 4) Why do many (xforms) dialogs not have tooltips yet? Is it only a matter
> of "not yet coded", or are there other reasons why to wait with
> expanding the tooltips facility.
Not yet coded. I've done a few dialogs but didn't find the time to proceed.
I'm happy if you
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>4) Why do many (xforms) dialogs not have tooltips yet? Is it only a matter
>>of "not yet coded", or are there other reasons why to wait with
>>expanding the tooltips facility.
>
>
> Not yet coded. I've done a few dialogs but didn't find
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> I was wondering if it's a better idea to make another file in src/frontends
> that has the tooltips and which will/can be shared by the frontends.
>
> If this is a good idea, then what would be the best way to set it up?
You mean the text? Good idea. I don't know if this is
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>I was wondering if it's a better idea to make another file in src/frontends
>>that has the tooltips and which will/can be shared by the frontends.
>>
>>If this is a good idea, then what would be the best way to set it up?
>
>
> You mean the
On Saturday 17 August 2002 8:52 am, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few tooltips issues:
>
> 1) Graphics dialog.
> The tooltips for the Graphics dialog work well, as long as I do not
> move the Graphics dialog somewhere else on my display.
> After moving the dialog, the tooltips text
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:12:48AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
> > I was wondering if it's a better idea to make another file in src/frontends
> > that has the tooltips and which will/can be shared by the frontends.
> >
> > If this is a good idea, then what would be
John Levon wrote:
> For tooltips it's not an option because the dialogs will differ, and
> they are encoded in the .ui file, and I don't want the Qt tooltips to be
> the George Bernard Shaw essays that xforms has. It would be possible for
Thank God that it is not James Joyce ;-)
> what's this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sunday 12 May 2002 20:33, Herbert Voss wrote:
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/ChangeLog said:
2002-05-09 Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Tooltips.C: enable tooltips by default.
I'm using the latest cvs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sunday 12 May 2002 20:33, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> > lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/ChangeLog said:
> >>2002-05-09 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>* Tooltips.C: enable tooltips by default.
> >
> > I'm using the
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/ChangeLog said:
2002-05-09 Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Tooltips.C: enable tooltips by default.
I'm using the latest cvs version with xforms-0., and although my lyx
comes up with the help-Tooltips
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
> lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/ChangeLog said:
>
>
>>2002-05-09 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>* Tooltips.C: enable tooltips by default.
>>
>
> I'm using the latest cvs version with xforms-0., and although my lyx
> comes up with the
Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, because the tooltips are designed to be lengthy, helpful and
annoying when you do not need them. So it is reasonable to turn
them off by default.
Allan I don't see a problem. Sure, some of the tooltips are long but
Allan you have to have
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> No, because the tooltips are designed to be lengthy, helpful and
>> annoying when you do not need them. So it is reasonable to turn
>> them off by default.
Allan> I don't see a problem. Sure, some of the tooltips are long but
Allan> you
On 11 Mar 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oops not so easy. I'll need another static signal in Dialogs.h
static bool SigC::Signal0bool Dialogs::tooltipsEnabled;
Allan Why? The tooltips should have a lyxrc entry and you can toggle
Allan
On 11 Mar 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Oops not so easy. I'll need another static signal in Dialogs.h
> >> static bool SigC::Signal0 Dialogs::tooltipsEnabled;
>
> Allan> Why? The tooltips should have a lyxrc entry and you can
On Sunday 10 March 2002 7:51 am, Allan Rae wrote:
case LFUN_TOOLTIPS_TOGGLE:
flag.setOnOff(Tooltips::enabled());
break;
Oops not so easy. I'll need another static signal in Dialogs.h
static bool SigC::Signal0bool Dialogs::tooltipsEnabled;
Why? The
Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oops not so easy. I'll need another static signal in Dialogs.h
static bool SigC::Signal0bool Dialogs::tooltipsEnabled;
Allan Why? The tooltips should have a lyxrc entry and you can toggle
Allan based on that value instead. Otherwise someone who
On Sunday 10 March 2002 7:51 am, Allan Rae wrote:
> > case LFUN_TOOLTIPS_TOGGLE:
> > flag.setOnOff(Tooltips::enabled());
> > break;
> >
> > Oops not so easy. I'll need another static signal in Dialogs.h
> > static bool SigC::Signal0 Dialogs::tooltipsEnabled;
>
>
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Oops not so easy. I'll need another static signal in Dialogs.h
>> static bool SigC::Signal0 Dialogs::tooltipsEnabled;
Allan> Why? The tooltips should have a lyxrc entry and you can toggle
Allan> based on that value instead. Otherwise
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Friday 08 March 2002 4:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus How do I create a little check box for the What's This entry in
Angus the Help menu, like the Emphasize Style entry in Layouts?
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 08 March 2002 4:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > Angus> How do I create a little check box for the What's This entry in
> > Angus> the Help menu, like the Emphasize
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus How do I create a little check box for the What's This entry in
Angus the Help menu, like the Emphasize Style entry in Layouts?
This is done in LyXFunc::getStatus. For example, for
buffer-toggle-readonly, it is
case
On Friday 08 March 2002 4:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus How do I create a little check box for the What's This entry in
Angus the Help menu, like the Emphasize Style entry in Layouts?
This is done in LyXFunc::getStatus. For
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> How do I create a little check box for the What's This entry in
Angus> the Help menu, like the Emphasize Style entry in Layouts?
This is done in LyXFunc::getStatus. For example, for
buffer-toggle-readonly, it is
case
On Friday 08 March 2002 4:37 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Angus> How do I create a little check box for the What's This entry in
> Angus> the Help menu, like the Emphasize Style entry in Layouts?
>
> This is done in
60 matches
Mail list logo
