Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-07-29 Thread Daniel
On 2023-06-24 12:18, Daniel wrote: On 2023-05-29 08:01, Daniel wrote: On 2023-05-04 12:39, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 04.05.2023 um 11:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about.

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-06-24 Thread Daniel
On 2023-05-29 08:01, Daniel wrote: On 2023-05-04 12:39, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 04.05.2023 um 11:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. I don't think anything else is a

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-06-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 04:12:02PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > And yeah, I still didn't have time to look on the -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY for > ghostscript > needed since TL-2021. This one should be covered now. P -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-29 Thread Daniel
On 2023-05-04 12:39, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 04.05.2023 um 11:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. I don't think anything else is a must-have. This one can be solved

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:05:05PM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > I assume that information will be in the release notes Yes. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-10 Thread Cor Blom
Op 10-05-2023 om 11:36 schreef Pavel Sanda: On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:13:52AM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:26:19AM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: openSUSE does contain GM, but it applies a patch to disable some coders. I Thanks for the info Cor. I guess it's in your hands

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:30:58AM +0200, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: > On the Mac GraphicsMagic is not available as default, but easily > installed with Homebrew (and I am sure MacPorts and similar ilk). But do we suffer on Mac with IM policy ban? Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:13:52AM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > >On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:26:19AM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > >>openSUSE does contain GM, but it applies a patch to disable some coders. I > > > >Thanks for the info Cor. > > > >I guess it's in your hands to add new dependencies for

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-10 Thread Dr Eberhard Lisse
On the Mac GraphicsMagic is not available as default, but easily installed with Homebrew (and I am sure MacPorts and similar ilk). I have been using that for years. Something like ln -fs $(brew --prefix)/opt/graphicsmagick/bin/gm /usr/local/bin/convert results in a 'convert' which does the

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-10 Thread Cor Blom
Op 10-05-2023 om 10:46 schreef Pavel Sanda: On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:26:19AM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: openSUSE does contain GM, but it applies a patch to disable some coders. I Thanks for the info Cor. I guess it's in your hands to add new dependencies for converters that will serve as a

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:26:19AM +0200, Cor Blom wrote: > openSUSE does contain GM, but it applies a patch to disable some coders. I Thanks for the info Cor. I guess it's in your hands to add new dependencies for converters that will serve as a workarounds for eps conversion - our only way

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-10 Thread Cor Blom
Op 09-05-2023 om 21:38 schreef Pavel Sanda: We need to check that opensuse (and fedora?) contain GM, and test it for some time to see possible side effects. openSUSE does contain GM, but it applies a patch to disable some coders. I don't see an easy way for users to get around that as there

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 05:49:46PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:17:46PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 5/4/23 12:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > >On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:00:27PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > > >>>Also as I mentioned in other subthread, would you

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:17:46PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 5/4/23 12:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:00:27PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > >>>Also as I mentioned in other subthread, would you mind posting the > >>>current > >>>version of

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-05 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 5/4/23 12:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:00:27PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Also as I mentioned in other subthread, would you mind posting the current version of /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml in fedora (please make sure you did not tweak the file on your own :)? The file is

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-05 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 5/4/23 06:39, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 04.05.2023 um 11:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. I don't think anything else is a must-have. This one can be solved for now

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:00:27PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > > Also as I mentioned in other subthread, would you mind posting the > > current > > version of /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml in fedora (please make sure > > you > > did not tweak the file on your own :)? > > The file is

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:06:12PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 16:31 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Please edit the page, no one will know better than you. P > > That can be done, the issue is if there is any place where this is > missing. > > The issue here is that since our

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread José Matos
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 16:31 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Please edit the page, no one will know better than you. P That can be done, the issue is if there is any place where this is missing. The issue here is that since our code tries to be resilient sometimes that is a bad thing. :-) That is

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread José Matos
On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 11:21 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 09:39:26PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck > wrote: > > I'm planning to manage the release. Now that classes are over here, > > I will > > have some time. The big questions are about what still needs doing. > > Great to

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/05/2023 à 16:12, Pavel Sanda a écrit : One thing I'd like to do before release is to merge Text.cpp Text2.cpp and Text3.cpp into a single file. It is so annoying to try to guess in which file something is defined. Would somebody be against this ? I was wondering myself if we should merge

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Stephan Witt
> Am 04.05.2023 um 11:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >> The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. I >> don't think anything else is a must-have. > > This one can be solved for now by building with Qt5,

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 04/05/2023 à 03:39, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : The big issue is the OSX shortcut bug, which I'm still not clear about. I don't think anything else is a must-have. This one can be solved for now by building with Qt5, right? Is there anything good enough on Qt6 for macOS that makes this

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 09:39:26PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > I'm planning to manage the release. Now that classes are over here, I will > have some time. The big questions are about what still needs doing. Great to hear that. So back to the original question - Jose, if you have a

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 5/3/23 14:43, Scott Kostyshak wrote: It is better to do such thing at the end of development window, so that in the future backports are easier. Would it be crazy to just merge also in 2.3.x? I'm guessing the answer is "yes" but still thought I would ask. It won't matter. There is one

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 5/2/23 09:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: One thing I'd like to do before release is to merge Text.cpp Text2.cpp and Text3.cpp into a single file. It is so annoying to try to guess in which file something is defined. Would somebody be against this ? No, that's a great idea. Riki --

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Sorry to top-post, but to get to the point: I'm planning to manage the release. Now that classes are over here, I will have some time. The big questions are about what still needs doing. On 5/2/23 06:09, Pavel Sanda wrote: Technically, what we need is to finish 1) sort out remaining bugs

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 03:11:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > One thing I'd like to do before release is to merge Text.cpp Text2.cpp and > Text3.cpp into a single file. It is so annoying to try to guess in which > file something is defined. Would somebody be against this ? Not me. If

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 08:37:47AM +0100, José Matos wrote: > > Do to this I think that the best is to proceed with 2.4 release. > > Ha! Now I know that 3 years of delay is making even Jose nervous :)) I thought he was going to use

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 03:21:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > > Technically, what we need is to finish > > 1) sort out remaining bugs with 2.4 target in trac > > 2) review/ sort out TODOs in wiki > > https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyX24Road > > FWIW the point there regarding python, as far as I can

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-02 Thread José Matos
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 12:09 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 08:37:47AM +0100, José Matos wrote: > > Do to this I think that the best is to proceed with 2.4 release. > > Ha! Now I know that 3 years of delay is making even Jose nervous :)) That and the fact that some of our

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 03:11:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 02/05/2023 ?? 12:09, Pavel Sanda a écrit : > >Technically, what we need is to finish > >1) sort out remaining bugs with 2.4 target in trac > >2) review/ sort out TODOs in wiki https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyX24Road > >2)

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/05/2023 à 12:09, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Technically, what we need is to finish 1) sort out remaining bugs with 2.4 target in trac 2) review/ sort out TODOs in wiki https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyX24Road 2) annouce string freeze to and ask translators to do their job What is the status of

Re: What is missing for LyX 2.4?

2023-05-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 08:37:47AM +0100, José Matos wrote: > Do to this I think that the best is to proceed with 2.4 release. Ha! Now I know that 3 years of delay is making even Jose nervous :)) > What are the major roadblocks for 2.4? What needs to be done? > I remember that at some point