On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:00, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Currently nesting there is
1. level: 4 spaces
2. level: 1 tab
3. level: 1 tab + 4 spaces
etc. which is a mess when tab != 8 spaces.
Is this mandatory for python or can't we simply use the same rules as in
the rest of LyX?
For
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:32, Andre Poenitz wrote:
So I'd rather have that in 'LyX style' with which emacs users _and_ I seem
to be happy. Moreover, it would make the whole of LyX more consistent.
Lars, any clue how to force emacs to do this?
Andre'
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:58 am, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:32, Andre Poenitz wrote:
So I'd rather have that in 'LyX style' with which emacs users _and_ I
seem to be happy. Moreover, it would make the whole of LyX more
consistent.
Lars, any clue how to
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:32, Andre Poenitz wrote:
|
| So I'd rather have that in 'LyX style' with which emacs users _and_ I seem
| to be happy. Moreover, it would make the whole of LyX more consistent.
|
| Lars, any clue how to force emacs to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:32, Andre Poenitz wrote:
| |
| | So I'd rather have that in 'LyX style' with which emacs users _and_ I seem
| | to be happy. Moreover, it would make the whole of LyX
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 11:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
(setq py-indent-offset 8)
should do the trick.
(M-x set-variable RET py-indent-offset RET 8 RET)
Ok, I already knew that (trial and error), but there is a small (not)
problem. It really inserts 8 spaces and not a tab. André
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:27:53PM +, José Matos wrote:
Ok, I already knew that (trial and error), but there is a small (not)
problem. It really inserts 8 spaces and not a tab. André will not like it.
I like it better than the mixed version...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:27:53PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 11:58, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
(setq py-indent-offset 8)
should do the trick.
(M-x set-variable RET py-indent-offset RET 8 RET)
Ok, I already knew that (trial and error), but there is a
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 12:37, Dekel Tsur wrote:
And ^Q + TAB is not a reasonable solution.
You need to add
(setq-default indent-tabs-mode t)
That did the trick, thanks.
--
José Abílio
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 08 January 2003 11:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| (setq py-indent-offset 8)
|
| should do the trick.
|
| (M-x set-variable RET py-indent-offset RET 8 RET)
|
| Ok, I already knew that (trial and error), but there is a small (not)
|
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:32:10AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I don't use emacs. This 'default' is unreadable for me unless I set
tabstop==8 (I usually have *shriek* 2), moreover it is a hassle to edit
Andre, Andre ... *shakes head*
/me runs
john
--
CUT IT OUT FACEHEAD
- jeffk
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:16:47AM +, José Matos wrote:
The cruel truth is that we use that style since it is emacs python mode
default.
I don't use emacs. This 'default' is unreadable for me unless I set
tabstop==8 (I usually have *shriek* 2), moreover it is a hassle to edit
for me (yes,
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:00, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Currently nesting there is
>
> 1. level: 4 spaces
> 2. level: 1 tab
> 3. level: 1 tab + 4 spaces
>
> etc. which is a mess when tab != 8 spaces.
>
> Is this mandatory for python or can't we simply use the same rules as in
> the rest of
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:32, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> So I'd rather have that in 'LyX style' with which emacs users _and_ I seem
> to be happy. Moreover, it would make the whole of LyX more consistent.
Lars, any clue how to force emacs to do this?
> Andre'
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:58 am, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:32, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > So I'd rather have that in 'LyX style' with which emacs users _and_ I
> > seem to be happy. Moreover, it would make the whole of LyX more
> > consistent.
>
> Lars, any clue
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:32, Andre Poenitz wrote:
| >
| > So I'd rather have that in 'LyX style' with which emacs users _and_ I seem
| > to be happy. Moreover, it would make the whole of LyX more consistent.
|
| Lars, any clue how to force emacs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | On Wednesday 08 January 2003 10:32, Andre Poenitz wrote:
| | >
| | > So I'd rather have that in 'LyX style' with which emacs users _and_ I seem
| | > to be happy. Moreover, it would make the whole of
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 11:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> (setq py-indent-offset 8)
>
> should do the trick.
>
> (M-x set-variable RET py-indent-offset RET 8 RET)
Ok, I already knew that (trial and error), but there is a small (not)
problem. It really inserts 8 spaces and not a tab.
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:27:53PM +, José Matos wrote:
> Ok, I already knew that (trial and error), but there is a small (not)
> problem. It really inserts 8 spaces and not a tab. André will not like it.
I like it better than the mixed version...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:27:53PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2003 11:58, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> >
> > (setq py-indent-offset 8)
> >
> > should do the trick.
> >
> > (M-x set-variable RET py-indent-offset RET 8 RET)
>
> Ok, I already knew that (trial and error),
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 12:37, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >
> > And ^Q + TAB is not a reasonable solution.
>
> You need to add
> (setq-default indent-tabs-mode t)
That did the trick, thanks.
--
José Abílio
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 08 January 2003 11:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > (setq py-indent-offset 8)
| >
| > should do the trick.
| >
| > (M-x set-variable RET py-indent-offset RET 8 RET)
|
| Ok, I already knew that (trial and error), but there is a small
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:32:10AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I don't use emacs. This 'default' is unreadable for me unless I set
> tabstop==8 (I usually have *shriek* 2), moreover it is a hassle to edit
Andre, Andre ... *shakes head*
/me runs
john
--
"CUT IT OUT FACEHEAD"
- jeffk
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:16:47AM +, José Matos wrote:
> The cruel truth is that we use that style since it is emacs python mode
> default.
I don't use emacs. This 'default' is unreadable for me unless I set
tabstop==8 (I usually have *shriek* 2), moreover it is a hassle to edit
for me
24 matches
Mail list logo
