Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Juergen Vigna
John Levon wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: ...table dialog? Would this be feasible? Jurgen, John, others? I like it. A couple of things : It should be Add/Dlelete not Append/Delete, it describes better what happens. I suspect it should be on the

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Edwin Leuven
Jurgen, Updated dialog attached. If you feel like finalizing please do. Best, Ed. On Thu Oct 31, 2002 14:27, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Edwin Leuven wrote: Yes but one could make things conditional on whether the (range of) cell is multicolumn or not. IIRC this is how things were before.

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:52:28AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: Longtable tab should be Table settings tab, and rotate table 90a should be moved there Are you sure about this? This stuff _really_ only works if one selects the longtable button! Otherwise you won't have any header/footers.

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Edwin Leuven wrote: Updated dialog attached. Very nice IMHO. One minor glitch: rotate table has nothing to do with longtabular, so it should not be disabled with the longtabular check. And I agree with Jürgen V. that it should not go to the long table tab. Why not leave it in the table

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Very nice IMHO. One minor glitch: rotate table has nothing to do with longtabular, so it should not be disabled with the longtabular check. And I agree with Jürgen V. that it should not go to the long table tab. Why not

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: it is currently in the rows/cols tab. That's wrong. I don't want to move into longtable tab. I want to replace longtable tab with table settings and put longtable stuff there, AND rotate table I understood that. But Edwin has renamed the rows/cols tab to Table settings,

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 04:14:22PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I understood that. But Edwin has renamed the rows/cols tab to Table settings, which is better IMO (as row/col is only one of several functions) and moved the table rotate to the longtable tab (have a look at the enabling

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: Oh, I suppose that new version passed me by Hang on. The mail delivery on the list is crawling these days. Jürgen.

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Juergen Vigna
John Levon wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: ...table dialog? Would this be feasible? Jurgen, John, others? I like it. A couple of things : It should be Add/Dlelete not Append/Delete, it describes better what happens. I suspect it should be on the

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Edwin Leuven
Jurgen, Updated dialog attached. If you feel like finalizing please do. Best, Ed. On Thu Oct 31, 2002 14:27, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Edwin Leuven wrote: > > Yes but one could make things conditional on whether the (range of) cell > > is multicolumn or not. IIRC this is how things were

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:52:28AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > >Longtable tab should be "Table settings" tab, and rotate table 90a > >should be moved there > > Are you sure about this? This stuff _really_ only works if one selects > the longtable button! Otherwise you won't have any

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Edwin Leuven wrote: > Updated dialog attached. Very nice IMHO. One minor glitch: "rotate table" has nothing to do with longtabular, so it should not be disabled with the longtabular check. And I agree with Jürgen V. that it should not go to the long table tab. Why not leave it in the table

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Very nice IMHO. One minor glitch: "rotate table" has nothing to do with > longtabular, so it should not be disabled with the longtabular check. > And I agree with Jürgen V. that it should not go to the long table tab. Why >

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: > it is currently in the rows/cols tab. That's wrong. I don't want to move > into longtable tab. I want to replace longtable tab with "table > settings" and put longtable stuff there, AND rotate table I understood that. But Edwin has renamed the rows/cols tab to "Table

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 04:14:22PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > I understood that. But Edwin has renamed the rows/cols tab to "Table > settings", which is better IMO (as row/col is only one of several functions) > and moved the table rotate to the longtable tab (have a look at the

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-31 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Levon wrote: > Oh, I suppose that new version passed me by Hang on. The mail delivery on the list is crawling these days. Jürgen.

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-30 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: ...table dialog? Would this be feasible? Jurgen, John, others? I like it. A couple of things : It should be Add/Dlelete not Append/Delete, it describes better what happens. I suspect it should be on the cols/rows tab as well,

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-30 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: ...table dialog? Would this be feasible? Jurgen, John, others? It is a lot clearer than the current one (and my try). Unfortunately, it does not match all cases. The alignment, border and width settings in the cell tab (that are

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-30 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: > ...table dialog? Would this be feasible? Jurgen, John, others? I like it. A couple of things : It should be Add/Dlelete not Append/Delete, it describes better what happens. I suspect it should be on the cols/rows tab as well,

Re: what about the following...

2002-10-30 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: > > ...table dialog? Would this be feasible? Jurgen, John, others? It is a lot clearer than the current one (and my try). Unfortunately, it does not match all cases. The alignment, border and width settings in the "cell" tab (that