On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:04:38PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/04/2016 21:48, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
> >Jean-Marc earlier suggested that I make a trac ticket. Time zones have
> >obviously got in the way. Is a ticket still needed?
> >
>
> I don't think so. Thanks for the report, I know
Le 11/04/2016 21:48, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
Jean-Marc earlier suggested that I make a trac ticket. Time zones have
obviously got in the way. Is a ticket still needed?
I don't think so. Thanks for the report, I know I would have suffered
from that bug at some point.
Guillaume
On 12/04/2016 8:17 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 11/04/2016 20:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:27:42PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 11/04/2016 20:10, Richard Heck a écrit :
Again, why stripping "Flex:" off the beginning of name_? This is
not
how it is done
Le 11/04/2016 20:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:27:42PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 11/04/2016 20:10, Richard Heck a écrit :
Again, why stripping "Flex:" off the beginning of name_? This is not
how it is done before the regression. Or did I miss something?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:27:42PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/04/2016 20:10, Richard Heck a écrit :
> Again, why stripping "Flex:" off the beginning of name_? This is not
> how it is done before the regression. Or did I miss something?
> >>>
> >>>name_ wouldn't have contained
Le 11/04/2016 20:10, Richard Heck a écrit :
Again, why stripping "Flex:" off the beginning of name_? This is not
how it is done before the regression. Or did I miss something?
name_ wouldn't have contained "Flex:". It's there because
InsetLayout::name() includes it.
I am not sure that you
On 04/11/2016 02:25 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/04/2016 19:02, Richard Heck a écrit :
>> On 04/11/2016 12:57 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>>> Le 11/04/2016 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> I can confirm that I do not see the
Le 11/04/2016 19:02, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 04/11/2016 12:57 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 11/04/2016 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it
with 2.2.0dev.
I suppose this is
On 04/11/2016 12:57 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/04/2016 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>> I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it
>>> with 2.2.0dev.
>>>
>>> I suppose this is a dataloss bug, and that
Le 11/04/2016 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it
with 2.2.0dev.
I suppose this is a dataloss bug, and that there is a rule of not going
to an RC with a known dataloss bug that
Le 11/04/2016 17:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 11/04/2016 18:33, Richard Heck a écrit :
Here is a very lightly tested patch. It looks OK to me, but this kind
of changes has potential to do more harm than good. So if we do not
have 1/ good user testing and 2/ a +1 from someone who
Le 11/04/2016 17:33, Richard Heck a écrit :
This is exactly what I was going to do. A quicker and dirtier and very
safe (IMO) fix is:
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ void InsetFlex::write(ostream & os) const
// use il.name(), since this resolves obsoleted
// InsetLayout
Le 11/04/2016 17:33, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 04/11/2016 12:28 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it
with 2.2.0dev.
I suppose this is a dataloss bug, and that there is a rule of not
Le 11/04/2016 18:33, Richard Heck a écrit :
Here is a very lightly tested patch. It looks OK to me, but this kind
of changes has potential to do more harm than good. So if we do not
have 1/ good user testing and 2/ a +1 from someone who understands
this code, I am not sure we want it in rc1. And
On 04/11/2016 12:28 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it
>> with 2.2.0dev.
>>
>> I suppose this is a dataloss bug, and that there is a rule of not going
>> to an RC with a known
Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it
with 2.2.0dev.
I suppose this is a dataloss bug, and that there is a rule of not going
to an RC with a known dataloss bug that is a regression. Although the
bug only shows in a
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:45:02PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/04/2016 12:36, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >Le 11/04/2016 07:27, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
> >>Suppose a module defines flex insets moo and baa (the locale-dependent
> >>version of foo and bah in New Zealand), and these
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:36:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/04/2016 07:27, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
> >Suppose a module defines flex insets moo and baa (the locale-dependent
> >version of foo and bah in New Zealand), and these are used in a document
> >to which the module has
Le 11/04/2016 17:45, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 11/04/2016 12:36, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 11/04/2016 07:27, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
Suppose a module defines flex insets moo and baa (the locale-dependent
version of foo and bah in New Zealand), and these are used in a document
to
Le 11/04/2016 12:36, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 11/04/2016 07:27, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
Suppose a module defines flex insets moo and baa (the locale-dependent
version of foo and bah in New Zealand), and these are used in a document
to which the module has been added. If the module is
Le 11/04/2016 07:27, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
Suppose a module defines flex insets moo and baa (the locale-dependent
version of foo and bah in New Zealand), and these are used in a document
to which the module has been added. If the module is now deleted from
the document, the flex insets become
Suppose a module defines flex insets moo and baa (the locale-dependent
version of foo and bah in New Zealand), and these are used in a document
to which the module has been added. If the module is now deleted from
the document, the flex insets become undefined. If the document is saved
then
22 matches
Mail list logo