Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

On 4 Apr 2001, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: Asger wrote: | Read the latest issue of C++ Users Journal for another take on the | conformance argument. Is it the conformance test by Herb Sutter you are refering to? Yes, it's the extensive conformance test of basically all existing C++

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

On 4 Apr 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Asger wrote: > | Read the latest issue of C++ Users Journal for another take on the > | conformance argument. > > Is it the conformance test by Herb Sutter you are refering to? Yes, it's the extensive conformance test of basically all existing C++

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

On 4 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Lars lyxstring is a hack. Please don't be too impressed by all those big guys in commitees. I agree with Jean-Marc, Juergen, Allan, and the others. Lgb, this time, I think you are simply wrong. An almost conformant, but really useful lyxstring is

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 4 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | Lars lyxstring is a hack. | | Please don't be too impressed by all those big guys in commitees. | | I agree with Jean-Marc, Juergen, Allan, and the others. | | Lgb, this time, I think you

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

On 4 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Lars> lyxstring is a hack. > > Please don't be too impressed by all those big guys in commitees. I agree with Jean-Marc, Juergen, Allan, and the others. Lgb, this time, I think you are simply wrong. An almost conformant, but really useful

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 4 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | > Lars> lyxstring is a hack. | > | > Please don't be too impressed by all those big guys in commitees. | | I agree with Jean-Marc, Juergen, Allan, and the others. | | Lgb, this time, I

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 2 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Dekel On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes | Dekel wrote: |Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same |

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 2 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | > > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > Dekel> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes | > Dekel> wrote: | > >> Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same | Lars CXXFLAGS), I find Lars Same compiler? Yes. gcc 2.95.2 on RH linux 6.1. JMarc

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same CXXFLAGS), I find schuss: size /local/lasgoutt/devbuild/src/lyx /local/lasgoutt/build/src/lyx textdata bss dec hex filename 3346450

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjnnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same | | Lars CXXFLAGS), I find | | Lars Same compiler? | | Yes.

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

"Dekel" == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dekel On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Dekel wrote: Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same CXXFLAGS), I find schuss: size /local/lasgoutt/devbuild/src/lyx /local/lasgoutt/build/src/lyx

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

On 2 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dekel On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Dekel wrote: Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same CXXFLAGS), I find schuss: size

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same | Lars> CXXFLAGS), I find Lars> Same compiler? Yes. gcc 2.95.2 on RH linux 6.1. JMarc

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same > CXXFLAGS), I find > > schuss: size /local/lasgoutt/devbuild/src/lyx /local/lasgoutt/build/src/lyx >textdata bss dec hex filename >

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same | | Lars> CXXFLAGS), I find | | Lars> Same

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Dekel> wrote: >> Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same >> CXXFLAGS), I find >> >> schuss: size /local/lasgoutt/devbuild/src/lyx >>

Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs?

On 2 Apr 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dekel> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Dekel> wrote: > >> Comparing the sizes of binaries of 1.1.6cvs and 1.2.0cvs (same > >> CXXFLAGS), I find > >> > >>