On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:25:00PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 10.56.51 WET Kornel Benko wrote:
> > There is one:
> > File 'preferences' is not updated, so I had to manually change occurrences
> > of 'python', 'python3' and 'python -tt' to '$${python}'.
> >
> >
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 10.56.51 WET Kornel Benko wrote:
> There is one:
> File 'preferences' is not updated, so I had to manually change occurrences
> of 'python', 'python3' and 'python -tt' to '$${python}'.
>
> The changed lines in preferences here:
> $ egrep python preferences
>
>
Am Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:25:00 +
schrieb José Abílio Matos :
> On Monday, 3 January 2022 22.40.05 WET Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > If i remember correctly, if the command starts with "python -tt" then we
> > could be sure it was a command defined by us and we replaced that with
> >
On Monday, 3 January 2022 22.40.05 WET Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> If i remember correctly, if the command starts with "python -tt" then we
> could be sure it was a command defined by us and we replaced that with
> os::python(). The last was for sure invoking a Python 2, while the bare
> python
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 08:48:09PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 2 January 2022 21.36.22 WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > OK, let me cc José on that.
> >
> > Riki
>
> I have a patch that it is mostly complete but I have one doubt.
> In src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp there is a
On Sunday, 2 January 2022 21.36.22 WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> OK, let me cc José on that.
>
> Riki
I have a patch that it is mostly complete but I have one doubt.
In src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp there is a comment that says:
// Make sure that a V2 python is run, if available
Does anyone
On Sunday, 2 January 2022 23.52.37 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Another option would be instead of doing this in LyXRC.cpp to do it in
> Converter.cpp and Mover.cpp where supposedly the commands are used. Then we
> could expose this to users.
This is the counterpart to the previous patch. The
On Sunday, 2 January 2022 21.36.22 WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 1/2/22 16:15, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:29:08AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> >> Where do people think things are now?
> >
> > If Jose is close to finish ${python} patch it would be good to
On 1/2/22 16:15, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:29:08AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Where do people think things are now?
If Jose is close to finish ${python} patch it would be good to have it
in the release. I believe this will trigger bunch of changes needed
for
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:29:08AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Where do people think things are now?
If Jose is close to finish ${python} patch it would be good to have it
in the release. I believe this will trigger bunch of changes needed
for various distro maintainers and we should
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 11:29:08AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> It seems there has been a lot of activity on cprotect, and some fixes after
> JMarc's big patch. Where do people think things are now?
> Are we settled
No.
> enough to move on to beta?
Yes :)
It would be nice though to
It seems there has been a lot of activity on cprotect, and some fixes
after JMarc's big patch. Where do people think things are now? Are we
settled enough to move on to beta? I still need to look at some of
Daniel's patches, but I'll get to that in the next few days.
Riki
--
lyx-devel
12 matches
Mail list logo
