Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hmm I belive my (future) any-patch will help to hinder these kinds
of things from happening.
Angus Excellent! I look forward to that patch!
Do you mean you look forward to any patch? I'd be more cautious if I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hmm I belive my (future) any-patch will help to hinder these kinds
of things from happening.
Angus Excellent! I look forward to that patch!
Do you mean you look forward to any patch? I'd be more cautious if I
were you.
My
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hmm I belive my (future) any-patch will help to hinder these
kinds of things from happening.
Angus Excellent! I look forward to that patch!
Do you mean you look forward to any
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
To be frank, I knew that. And you are ruining my not-so-subtle joke :)
Talking of not so subtle jokes: How do you make a cat go 'woof'?
With petrol and a match.
--
Angus
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Talking of not so subtle jokes: How do you make a cat go 'woof'?
With petrol and a match.
That's cruelty to cats! I strongly detest that!
How do you make a dog go 'miao' ?
(deep freezer and a chainsaw)
/Andreas
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
To be frank, I knew that. And you are ruining my not-so-subtle joke :)
| Talking of not so subtle jokes: How do you make a cat go 'woof'?
| With petrol and a match.
And how to make a dog go 'mjjaauu'?
Freeze it and take
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Hmm I belive my (future) any-patch will help to hinder these kinds
>> of things from happening.
Angus> Excellent! I look forward to that patch!
Do you mean you look forward to any patch? I'd be more
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> Hmm I belive my (future) any-patch will help to hinder these kinds
>>> of things from happening.
>
> Angus> Excellent! I look forward to that patch!
>
> Do you mean you look forward to any patch? I'd be more cautious if I
> were
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hmm I belive my (future) any-patch will help to hinder these
kinds of things from happening.
>>
Angus> Excellent! I look forward to that patch!
>> Do you mean you
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> To be frank, I knew that. And you are ruining my not-so-subtle joke :)
Talking of not so subtle jokes: How do you make a cat go 'woof'?
With petrol and a match.
--
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Talking of not so subtle jokes: How do you make a cat go 'woof'?
>
> With petrol and a match.
>
That's cruelty to cats! I strongly detest that!
How do you make a dog go 'miao' ?
(deep freezer and a chainsaw)
/Andreas
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> To be frank, I knew that. And you are ruining my not-so-subtle joke :)
>
| Talking of not so subtle jokes: How do you make a cat go 'woof'?
>
| With petrol and a match.
And how to make a dog go 'mjjaauu'?
Freeze it and
John Spray wrote:
Seems that the core doesn't accept empty strings.
Attached patch works for me without any warnings. Perhaps there's some
interal reason that it's bad, I don't know.
I think we do not want to write params to the file if they are actually empty.
We should rather investigate
Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| John Spray wrote:
Seems that the core doesn't accept empty strings.
Attached patch works for me without any warnings. Perhaps there's some
interal reason that it's bad, I don't know.
| I think we do not want to write params to the file if
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hmm I belive my (future) any-patch will help to hinder these kinds of
things from happening.
Excellent! I look forward to that patch!
--
Angus
John Spray wrote:
>> Seems that the core doesn't accept empty strings.
>
> Attached patch works for me without any warnings. Perhaps there's some
> interal reason that it's bad, I don't know.
I think we do not want to write params to the file if they are actually empty.
We should rather
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Spray wrote:
>>> Seems that the core doesn't accept empty strings.
>>
>> Attached patch works for me without any warnings. Perhaps there's some
>> interal reason that it's bad, I don't know.
>
| I think we do not want to write params to the
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Hmm I belive my (future) any-patch will help to hinder these kinds of
> things from happening.
Excellent! I look forward to that patch!
--
Angus
Hi,
Here's the weirdness:
- Open document settings
- Make a change, eg put some text in Extra options
- Click Apply, or OK if you like
- Click Use Class Defaults. The extra options box is now blanked, as
one would expect.
- Click Apply, or OK if you like
- Close the dialog, then open it again
-
John Spray wrote:
Here's the weirdness:
- Open document settings
- Make a change, eg put some text in Extra options
- Click Apply, or OK if you like
- Click Use Class Defaults. The extra options box is now blanked, as
one would expect.
- Click Apply, or OK if you like
- Close the dialog,
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 16:16 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
This does not depend on Use Class Defaults. The actual bug is that it is
impossible delete extra options once they have been applied (not in 1.3.x
btw). Seems that the core doesn't accept empty strings.
Attached patch works for
Hi,
Here's the weirdness:
- Open document settings
- Make a change, eg put some text in "Extra options"
- Click Apply, or OK if you like
- Click "Use Class Defaults". The extra options box is now blanked, as
one would expect.
- Click Apply, or OK if you like
- Close the dialog, then open it
John Spray wrote:
> Here's the weirdness:
> - Open document settings
> - Make a change, eg put some text in "Extra options"
> - Click Apply, or OK if you like
> - Click "Use Class Defaults". The extra options box is now blanked, as
> one would expect.
> - Click Apply, or OK if you like
> - Close
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 16:16 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> This does not depend on "Use Class Defaults". The actual bug is that it is
> impossible delete extra options once they have been applied (not in 1.3.x
> btw). Seems that the core doesn't accept empty strings.
Attached patch works
24 matches
Mail list logo
