On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I think we should provide a link to the preview-latex homepage in the
NEWS file.
Ok.
I also wonder whether we should activate preview-latex by default
No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are
conceptual
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I think we should provide a link to the preview-latex homepage in the
NEWS file.
Ok.
See attachment for patch.
I also wonder whether we should activate preview-latex by default
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are
conceptual problems (fancy preambles) that make this wonderful feature
unusable under some circumstances. It certainly should not default to on.
I know the first
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Yes, I guess so. Unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge to provide
a patch for it
The ERT problem is unsolvable.
:-)
I didn't refer to the ERT problem but to the extension of the configure
script to list all third-party products (pspell, aiksaurus, checktex,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are
conceptual problems (fancy preambles) that make this wonderful
feature unusable under some circumstances. It certainly should not
default to
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:30:36AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Ummm. We already loop over the document to output all math macros.
Could we also output all ERT insets?
All up to the position of the snippet. And if the snippet is moved, we
can't use the cached image. And so on. This is a can of
Andre Poenitz wrote:
It's probably better to produce a single full dvi preview in the background
all the time and snip from there instead of the current snippet based
approach (which is simple and cute, but not robust at all).
Please do not put too much effort into something that can't be
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
After all, the problem will only occur for real power users. IMHO it
would be a complete waste of time to redesign the preview code which
works very well in general.
But you accept that very well in general is not sufficient to
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
After all, the problem will only occur for real power users. IMHO it
would be a complete waste of time to redesign the preview code which
works very well in general.
But you accept that very well in
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:14:31PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
The problems should simply be documented. AFAICS, if you do not use ERT,
preview-latex will work fine.
Simply go into a 'a^b' inset and press C-I to lock it. No fancy preview
anymore...
Ok, this is the only bug I am
Andre Poenitz wrote:
There is another one: Currently, \lyxlock gets written to the .tex
snippets. This indicates that preview uses the write to .lyx
method instead of write to .tex (I think this is a boolean flag
somewhere, haven't looked at it, though)
Do you mean the 'nice' flag passed to
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:48:40PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
There is another one: Currently, \lyxlock gets written to the .tex
snippets. This indicates that preview uses the write to .lyx
method instead of write to .tex (I think this is a boolean flag
somewhere, haven't looked at it,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Judging from
int InsetFormula::latex(Buffer const *, ostream os, bool fragile,
bool) const
{
WriteStream wi(os, fragile, true);
par_-write(wi);
return wi.line();
}
that's not the place.
Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself?
Ie, it
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:12:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself?
Ie, it would go away if we had control over the 'true' passed to the
WriteStream c-tor.
We could certainly use that, but I don't know what the 'nice' flag is good
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:12:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself?
Ie, it would go away if we had control over the 'true' passed to
the WriteStream c-tor.
We could certainly use that, but I don't know what
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:44:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Happy if I apply it?
Yes.
Guess that Lars should give his Ok too ;-)
I suppose so.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:44:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
| Happy if I apply it?
|
| Yes.
|
| Guess that Lars should give his Ok too ;-)
|
| I suppose so.
Does it fix a real problem?
If so, commit it.
--
Lgb
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:47:38PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Does it fix a real problem?
Yes. preview does not work without it if only a single formula is locked.
[Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:54:21PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
[Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?]
What is this ?
john
--
Anyone who quotes Rusty in their sig is an idiot.
- me
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:56:12PM +, John Levon wrote:
[Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?]
What is this ?
If you press C-i inset a mathinset, it gets locked and Cursor Left/Right
jumps over it with a single keystroke.
To unlock, press C-i again. Up/Down isn't affected.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I think we should provide a link to the preview-latex homepage in the
> NEWS file.
Ok.
> I also wonder whether we should activate preview-latex by default
No. There are still rough edges (displa
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I think we should provide a link to the preview-latex homepage in the
NEWS file.
Ok.
See attachment for patch.
I also wonder whether we should activate preview-latex by default
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> >No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are
> >conceptual problems (fancy preambles) that make this wonderful feature
> >unusable under some circumstances. It certainly should not default to on.
>
> I know the
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Yes, I guess so. Unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge to provide
a patch for it
The ERT problem is unsolvable.
:-)
I didn't refer to the ERT problem but to the extension of the configure
script to list all third-party products (pspell, aiksaurus, checktex,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> >No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are
>> >conceptual problems (fancy preambles) that make this wonderful
>> >feature unusable under some circumstances. It certainly should not
>>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:30:36AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ummm. We already loop over the document to output all math macros.
> Could we also output all ERT insets?
All up to the position of the snippet. And if the snippet is moved, we
can't use the cached image. And so on. This is a can
Andre Poenitz wrote:
It's probably better to produce a single full dvi preview in the background
"all the time" and snip from there instead of the current "snippet based"
approach (which is simple and cute, but not robust at all).
Please do not put too much effort into something that can't be
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> After all, the problem will only occur for real power users. IMHO it
> would be a complete waste of time to redesign the preview code which
> works very well in general.
But you accept that "very well in general" is not
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> After all, the problem will only occur for real power users. IMHO it
>> would be a complete waste of time to redesign the preview code which
>> works very well in general.
>
> But you accept that "very
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:14:31PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> The problems should simply be documented. AFAICS, if you do not use ERT,
> preview-latex will work fine.
Simply go into a 'a^b' inset and press C-I to lock it. No fancy preview
anymore...
Ok, this is the only bug I am
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There is another one: Currently, \lyxlock gets written to the .tex
> snippets. This indicates that preview uses the "write to .lyx"
> method instead of "write to .tex" (I think this is a boolean flag
> somewhere, haven't looked at it, though)
Do you mean the 'nice' flag
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:48:40PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > There is another one: Currently, \lyxlock gets written to the .tex
> > snippets. This indicates that preview uses the "write to .lyx"
> > method instead of "write to .tex" (I think this is a boolean flag
> > somewhere, haven't
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Judging from
> int InsetFormula::latex(Buffer const *, ostream & os, bool fragile,
> bool) const
> {
> WriteStream wi(os, fragile, true);
> par_->write(wi);
> return wi.line();
> }
> that's not the place.
Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself?
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:12:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself?
> Ie, it would go away if we had control over the 'true' passed to the
> WriteStream c-tor.
We could certainly use that, but I don't know what the 'nice' flag is
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:12:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself?
>> Ie, it would go away if we had control over the 'true' passed to
>> the WriteStream c-tor.
>
> We could certainly use that, but I don't
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:44:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Happy if I apply it?
Yes.
> Guess that Lars should give his Ok too ;-)
I suppose so.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:44:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
| > Happy if I apply it?
|
| Yes.
|
| > Guess that Lars should give his Ok too ;-)
|
| I suppose so.
Does it fix a real problem?
If so, commit it.
--
Lgb
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:47:38PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Does it fix a real problem?
Yes. preview does not work without it if only a single formula is locked.
[Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:54:21PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> [Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?]
What is this ?
john
--
"Anyone who quotes Rusty in their sig is an idiot."
- me
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:56:12PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > [Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?]
>
> What is this ?
If you press C-i inset a mathinset, it gets "locked" and Cursor Left/Right
jumps over it with a single keystroke.
To unlock, press C-i again. Up/Down isn't
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Shouldn't it be updated at least partly before the first pre
Lars release? | This would allow people to know what they should look
Lars for...
Lars For sure.
Lars Feel free.
OK, I
On Thursday 19 December 2002 11:29, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What's new in version 1.3.0?
Note also that the xforms library has been very recently updated to
version 1.0. This version has been released under the GPL, and the
Here we (not We) go again: not
José == José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
José On Thursday 19 December 2002 11:29, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What's new in version 1.3.0?
Note also that the xforms library has been very recently updated to
version 1.0. This version has been released under
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
** Math editor
There have been few visible and some not-so-visible changes. On the visible
side we have better visual feedback regarding the structure of a formula by
showing the nesting by small purple decorations in the
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:44:04AM +, José Matos wrote:
lyx2lyx should be able to read older lyx files up to 0.12 days. 0.10 series
is in the works for 0.10 (1.4 time line) and still older files are in the
forge. Basically if lyx wrote it lyx will read it. :-)
How far advanced is the
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote:
** Math editor
Thanks, I'll add that.
Andre There have been few visible and some not-so-visible changes. On
Andre the visible side we have better visual feedback
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre square root to an array. This does not simplify the code
^^
Do you mean 'not only' here?
Yes.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
- Other??
The optional argument for sections, captions et al.
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
The optional argument for sections, captions et al.
and the wrap figure inset
Jürgen.
On Thursday 19 December 2002 11:29 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
** Xforms frontend
New features:
- Angus??
Oooh, owww. I don't think that there are any new features. Actually that's
not quite true.
In most cases the dialogs have been designed to make it impossible to input
invalid
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
The optional argument for sections, captions et al.
Juergen and the wrap figure inset
Indeed (twice).
JMarc
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Thursday 19 December 2002 11:29 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus wrote:
** Xforms frontend
New features:
- Angus??
Angus Oooh, owww. I don't think that there are any new features.
Angus Actually that's not quite true.
I added your
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 06:11:43PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Feel free to criticize the english.
Something like 'The English are a bunch of foobar people'?
SCNR,
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
** Qt frontend
There are a few caveats though:
They're still up in the air very much :)
- Other??
short title
multi lang spellcheck
insetwrap
regards
john
--
ALL television is children's television.
-
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> Shouldn't it be updated at least partly before the first pre
Lars> release? | This would allow people to know what they should look
Lars> for...
Lars> For sure.
Lars>
On Thursday 19 December 2002 11:29, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> What's new in version 1.3.0?
>
>
> Note also that the xforms library has been very recently updated to
> version 1.0. This version has been released under the GPL, and the
Here we (not We) go again:
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Thursday 19 December 2002 11:29, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What's new in version 1.3.0?
>>
>> Note also that the xforms library has been very recently updated to
>> version 1.0. This version has
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> ** Math editor
There have been few visible and some not-so-visible changes. On the visible
side we have better visual feedback regarding the structure of a formula by
showing the nesting by small purple decorations in the
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:44:04AM +, José Matos wrote:
> lyx2lyx should be able to read older lyx files up to 0.12 days. 0.10 series
> is in the works for 0.10 (1.4 time line) and still older files are in the
> forge. Basically if lyx wrote it lyx will read it. :-)
How far advanced is
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> ** Math editor
Thanks, I'll add that.
Andre> There have been few visible and some not-so-visible changes. On
Andre> the visible side we have better
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 01:00:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> square root to an array. This does not simplify the code
> ^^
> Do you mean 'not only' here?
Yes.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> - Other??
The optional argument for sections, captions et al.
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> The optional argument for sections, captions et al.
and the wrap figure inset
Jürgen.
On Thursday 19 December 2002 11:29 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> ** Xforms frontend
>
> New features:
>
> - Angus??
Oooh, owww. I don't think that there are any new features. Actually that's
not quite true.
In most cases the dialogs have been designed to make it impossible to input
invalid
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> The optional argument for sections, captions et al.
Juergen> and the wrap figure inset
Indeed (twice).
JMarc
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Thursday 19 December 2002 11:29 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus> wrote:
>> ** Xforms frontend
>>
>> New features:
>>
>> - Angus??
Angus> Oooh, owww. I don't think that there are any new features.
Angus> Actually that's not
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 06:11:43PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Feel free to criticize the english.
Something like 'The English are a bunch of foobar people'?
SCNR,
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> ** Qt frontend
>
> There are a few caveats though:
They're still up in the air very much :)
> - Other??
short title
multi lang spellcheck
insetwrap
regards
john
--
"ALL television is children's television."
-
Shouldn't it be updated at least partly before the first pre release?
This would allow people to know what they should look for...
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Shouldn't it be updated at least partly before the first pre release?
| This would allow people to know what they should look for...
For sure.
Feel free.
--
Lgb
Shouldn't it be updated at least partly before the first pre release?
This would allow people to know what they should look for...
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Shouldn't it be updated at least partly before the first pre release?
| This would allow people to know what they should look for...
For sure.
Feel free.
--
Lgb
72 matches
Mail list logo
