Glossaries has. See Extended.lyx section 3.3.
On 5/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 13 May 2007 20:26:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would if I could - I have only used LyX once in the last year or so,
which means I have no
Outliner and embedded TOC
About this feature, how can I open this dialog? The only way I can see
is insert TOC and click on it. The weird part is that this dialog
disappears when the inset is deleted.
It makes sense to me to separate this dialog with the inset, and add
view-outline.
Maybe I
Bo Peng wrote:
Maybe I just missed something really basic.
Document-Table of Contens.
Jürgen
On 5/16/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
Maybe I just missed something really basic.
Document-Table of Contens.
Thanks!
It makes much more sense to me to have view-table of contents instead
of document-toc. Because this is an outlined *view* of the document,
Bo Peng wrote:
Thanks!
It makes much more sense to me to have view-table of contents instead
of document-toc. Because this is an outlined *view* of the document,
and displaying this dialog will not change the document in any way.
But the document can be changed significantly by that dialog
Bo Peng wrote:
On 5/16/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
Maybe I just missed something really basic.
Document-Table of Contens.
Thanks!
It makes much more sense to me to have view-table of contents instead
of document-toc. Because this is an outlined *view* of
Glossaries has. See Extended.lyx section 3.3.
On 5/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
> On Sunday 13 May 2007 20:26:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I would if I could - I have only used LyX once in the last year or so,
>> which means I
Outliner and embedded TOC
About this feature, how can I open this dialog? The only way I can see
is insert TOC and click on it. The weird part is that this dialog
disappears when the inset is deleted.
It makes sense to me to separate this dialog with the inset, and add
view->outline.
Maybe I
Bo Peng wrote:
> Maybe I just missed something really basic.
Document->Table of Contens.
Jürgen
On 5/16/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
> Maybe I just missed something really basic.
Document->Table of Contens.
Thanks!
It makes much more sense to me to have view->table of contents instead
of document->toc. Because this is an outlined *view* of the
Bo Peng wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> It makes much more sense to me to have view->table of contents instead
> of document->toc. Because this is an outlined *view* of the document,
> and displaying this dialog will not change the document in any way.
But the document can be changed significantly by that
Bo Peng wrote:
On 5/16/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
> Maybe I just missed something really basic.
Document->Table of Contens.
Thanks!
It makes much more sense to me to have view->table of contents instead
of document->toc. Because this is an outlined
On Sunday 13 May 2007 20:26:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would if I could - I have only used LyX once in the last year or so,
which means I have no idea about what new features there might be.
However, looking at SVN, I can for instance see that:
* Reference.lyx - last updated a year ago...
On Tue, 15 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 13 May 2007 20:26:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would if I could - I have only used LyX once in the last year or so,
which means I have no idea about what new features there might be.
However, looking at SVN, I can for instance see that:
*
On Sunday 13 May 2007 20:26:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would if I could - I have only used LyX once in the last year or so,
> which means I have no idea about what new features there might be.
>
> However, looking at SVN, I can for instance see that:
>
> * Reference.lyx - last updated a year
On Tue, 15 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 13 May 2007 20:26:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would if I could - I have only used LyX once in the last year or so,
which means I have no idea about what new features there might be.
However, looking at SVN, I can for instance see that:
*
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[*] I honestly don't think we'll have time to do anything before 1.5.0,
but what about after? How are we to deal with the documentation?
I think we (you ;-)) should do a call for help in the users list.
I could ask,
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Well that never stopped us before, did it? ;-)
What are the features that you think are underdocumented or not
documented at all?
Please make a list and post it here.
I would if I could - I have only used LyX once in the
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[*] I honestly don't think we'll have time to do anything before 1.5.0,
but what about after? How are we to deal with the documentation?
I think we (you ;-)) should do a call for help in the users list.
I could ask,
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Well that never stopped us before, did it? ;-)
What are the features that you think are underdocumented or not
documented at all?
Please make a list and post it here.
I would if I could - I have only used LyX once in the
On Thu, 10 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
Bo said that the intention is to have the documentation ready before
1.5.0 (at least examples files).
I was thinking about features in general, not the listings stuff. AFAICR,
documentation (its status) hasn't really been discussed in quite some
José Matos wrote:
Well that never stopped us before, did it? ;-)
What are the features that you think are underdocumented or not documented
at all?
Please make a list and post it here.
Contributing to documentation is easier than code - because one
can spend 10min now and then writing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[*] I honestly don't think we'll have time to do anything before 1.5.0,
but what about after? How are we to deal with the documentation?
I think we (you ;-)) should do a call for help in the users list.
Abdel.
On Thu, 10 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
Bo said that the intention is to have the documentation ready before
1.5.0 (at least examples files).
I was thinking about features in general, not the listings stuff. AFAICR,
documentation (its status) hasn't really been discussed in quite some
José Matos wrote:
Well that never stopped us before, did it? ;-)
What are the features that you think are underdocumented or not documented
at all?
Please make a list and post it here.
Contributing to documentation is easier than code - because one
can spend 10min now and then writing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[*] I honestly don't think we'll have time to do anything before 1.5.0,
but what about after? How are we to deal with the documentation?
I think we (you ;-)) should do a call for help in the users list.
Abdel.
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
When you add new features or change menu names, toolbar buttons, or any
other kind of GUI changes, could you please also update the
documentation?
For new features the docmentation requires more work, but while you are
writing it, you often find some
On Thursday 10 May 2007 16:04:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Uwe brings up important questions here. How are we to deal with
the documenation? It's not reasonable to expect Uwe to just do it!
Thoughts?
Bo said that the intention is to have the documentation ready before 1.5.0
(at
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
When you add new features or change menu names, toolbar buttons, or any
other kind of GUI changes, could you please also update the
documentation?
For new features the docmentation requires more work, but while you are
writing it, you often find some
On Thursday 10 May 2007 16:04:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think Uwe brings up important questions here. How are we to deal with
> the documenation? It's not reasonable to expect Uwe to just do it!
>
> Thoughts?
Bo said that the intention is to have the documentation ready before 1.5.0
(at
30 matches
Mail list logo
