I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to version
1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
frontend.
So...
Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why you
didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past.
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to version
| 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
| frontend.
|
| So...
So... what specific problems did you have with the new lyxsum, on what
code
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting
Angus lyxsum.C to version 1.18 and so can now address some of the
Angus bugs that I know to exist in the frontend.
Note that it should work now with the real head code. At least I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Angus I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting
| Angus lyxsum.C to version 1.18 and so can now address some of the
| Angus bugs that I know to exist in the frontend.
|
| Note
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:55, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why
you
didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past. I know that it didn't do
all
that it should but have lost the relevant
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to
version
| 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
| frontend.
|
| So...
So...
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to
| version
| | 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know
On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
I just tried the Apply stuff and now it works as expected (for me).
Could I have one more request? Would it be possible to have some sort
of Reset button which put's all the fields again into No change?
Would that be a good idea and/or fast to realize?
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
Lars 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Angus Leeming
Lars [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | I have FINALLY managed to
Lars compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to |
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
| Lars 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Angus Leeming
| Lars [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | I have FINALLY
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars by some amount of time it seems... Then I guess the boost people
Lars will not be overly eager to fix this.
Lars Angus, what are your changes of getting a newer compiler?
And the latest is 6.3.
JMarc
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 16:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
| Lars 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Angus
I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to version
1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
frontend.
So...
Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why you
didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past.
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to version
| 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
| frontend.
|
| So...
So... what specific problems did you have with the new lyxsum, on what
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting
Angus> lyxsum.C to version 1.18 and so can now address some of the
Angus> bugs that I know to exist in the frontend.
Note that it should work now with the real head code.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Angus> I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting
| Angus> lyxsum.C to version 1.18 and so can now address some of the
| Angus> bugs that I know to exist in the
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:55, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why
you
> > didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past. I know that it didn't do
all
> > that it should but have lost the
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to
version
> | 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
> | frontend.
> |
> | So...
>
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to
| version
| > | 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that
On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
I just tried the Apply stuff and now it works as expected (for me).
Could I have one more request? Would it be possible to have some sort
of "Reset" button which put's all the fields again into "No change"?
Would that be a good idea and/or fast to realize?
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming
Lars> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I have FINALLY managed to
Lars> compile lyx again by
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
| Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming
| Lars> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > |
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> by some amount of time it seems... Then I guess the boost people
Lars> will not be overly eager to fix this.
Lars> Angus, what are your changes of getting a newer compiler?
And the latest is 6.3.
JMarc
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 16:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
> | Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik
"Michael" == Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, for the other font buttons, we force toggling (bold, etc)
because this makes sense. Are you saying that we should the
freefont stuff so that it works exactly like the popup? This seems
sensible.
Michael Yes, definitely!!! This
On 12 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
As far as I can see this is the case now for 1.2.0cvs, where the
character popup has been moved to GUI-I land. I do not know how easy
this would be for 1.1.6.
IMHO 1.1.6 is unusable due to the major problems with tables. Therefore,
if I were you, I
"Michael" == Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael IMHO 1.1.6 is unusable due to the major problems with tables.
Michael Therefore, if I were you, I wouldn't spend a single minute on
Michael further bug fix releases. 1.2.0 is all I am longing for...
Not everybody is as dependant on
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, for the other font buttons, we force toggling (bold, etc)
>> because this makes sense. Are you saying that we should the
>> freefont stuff so that it works exactly like the popup? This seems
>> sensible.
Michael> Yes,
On 12 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> As far as I can see this is the case now for 1.2.0cvs, where the
> character popup has been moved to GUI-I land. I do not know how easy
> this would be for 1.1.6.
IMHO 1.1.6 is unusable due to the major problems with tables. Therefore,
if I were
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> IMHO 1.1.6 is unusable due to the major problems with tables.
Michael> Therefore, if I were you, I wouldn't spend a single minute on
Michael> further bug fix releases. 1.2.0 is all I am longing for...
Not everybody is as
Hi,
Michael First of all, LyX does not behave the way the dialog suggests
Michael it. Secondly, my experience is that you don't always want LyX
Michael to toggle layout settings in practice. For that reason, it
Michael would like to draw your attention to the fact that
Michael "font-free"
Hi,
> Michael> First of all, LyX does not behave the way the dialog suggests
> Michael> it. Secondly, my experience is that you don't always want LyX
> Michael> to toggle layout settings in practice. For that reason, it
> Michael> would like to draw your attention to the fact that
> Michael>
Now, we can argue whether this is a good thing or not. Either the
popup or the code have to be fixed. Do people who use this feature
often have an idea on it? Michael seems to think this does not make
sense.
First of all, LyX does not behave the way the dialog suggests it. Secondly, my
> Now, we can argue whether this is a good thing or not. Either the
> popup or the code have to be fixed. Do people who use this feature
> often have an idea on it? Michael seems to think this does not make
> sense.
First of all, LyX does not behave the way the dialog suggests it. Secondly, my
"John" == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John In
John
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=233236group_id=15212atid=115212
John Michael points out that the size is toggled with default despite
John the claims of the dialog.
John Who is wrong, the dialog or the
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In
John>
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail=233236_id=15212=115212
John> Michael points out that the size is toggled with default despite
John> the claims of the dialog.
John> Who is wrong, the dialog or the
In
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=233236group_id=15212atid=115212
Michael points out that the size is toggled with default despite the claims of the
dialog.
Who is wrong, the dialog or the behaviour, or something else ?
john
--
"If one tells the truth, one is
In
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail=233236_id=15212=115212
Michael points out that the size is toggled with default despite the claims of the
dialog.
Who is wrong, the dialog or the behaviour, or something else ?
john
--
"If one tells the truth, one is sure, sooner or
38 matches
Mail list logo
