[PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. Enabling link-time optimization turns debug information off (-g), sine -flto and -g does not currently well work together. Also stdlib-debug is turned off, does also not work well with -flto. --- config/lyxinclude.m4 | 27

Re: [PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Le 24/10/2012 13:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. Do you see a visible gain, that would make it worth using on release builds? JMarc

Re: [PATCH 2/2] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for --enable-cxx11

On 10/23/2012 09:07 PM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Using --enable-cxx11 turns on C++11 mode in gcc. Seems like a good idea. rh

Re: [PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org writes: | Le 24/10/2012 13:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. | Do you see a visible gain, that would make it worth using on release builds? textdatabss dec hexfilename 8042443 28616

Re: [PATCH 2/2] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for --enable-cxx11

Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org writes: | On 10/23/2012 09:07 PM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Using --enable-cxx11 turns on C++11 mode in gcc. | Seems like a good idea. I will have to commit 1/2 in this series as well. Ok? -- Lgb

Re: [PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Le 24/10/12 22:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org writes: | Le 24/10/2012 13:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. | Do you see a visible gain, that would make it worth using on release builds? text

Re: [PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org writes: | Le 24/10/12 22:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org writes: | Le 24/10/2012 13:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. | Do you see a visible gain, that would

[PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. Enabling link-time optimization turns debug information off (-g), sine -flto and -g does not currently well work together. Also stdlib-debug is turned off, does also not work well with -flto. --- config/lyxinclude.m4 | 27

Re: [PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Le 24/10/2012 13:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. Do you see a visible gain, that would make it worth using on release builds? JMarc

Re: [PATCH 2/2] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for --enable-cxx11

On 10/23/2012 09:07 PM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Using --enable-cxx11 turns on C++11 mode in gcc. Seems like a good idea. rh

Re: [PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: | Le 24/10/2012 13:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : >> Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. > | Do you see a visible gain, that would make it worth using on release builds? textdatabss dec hexfilename 8042443

Re: [PATCH 2/2] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for --enable-cxx11

Richard Heck writes: | On 10/23/2012 09:07 PM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Using --enable-cxx11 turns on C++11 mode in gcc. | Seems like a good idea. I will have to commit 1/2 in this series as well. Ok? -- Lgb

Re: [PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Le 24/10/12 22:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: | Le 24/10/2012 13:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. | Do you see a visible gain, that would make it worth using on release builds? text

Re: [PATCH] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for -flto

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: | Le 24/10/12 22:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: >> >> | Le 24/10/2012 13:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Add feature --enable-lto, link-time optimization. >>> >> | Do you see a visible

[PATCH 2/2] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for --enable-cxx11

Using --enable-cxx11 turns on C++11 mode in gcc. --- config/lyxinclude.m4 | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/config/lyxinclude.m4 b/config/lyxinclude.m4 index e532c54..2e529ea 100644 --- a/config/lyxinclude.m4 +++ b/config/lyxinclude.m4 @@ -232,6 +232,10

[PATCH 2/2] config/lyxinclude.m4: add support for --enable-cxx11

Using --enable-cxx11 turns on C++11 mode in gcc. --- config/lyxinclude.m4 | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/config/lyxinclude.m4 b/config/lyxinclude.m4 index e532c54..2e529ea 100644 --- a/config/lyxinclude.m4 +++ b/config/lyxinclude.m4 @@ -232,6 +232,10

Re: [Cvslog] r25898 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: config/lyxinclude.m4 config...

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:12PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:50:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Author: forenr Date: Sat Jul 26 12:45:38 2008 New Revision: 25898 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/25898

Re: [Cvslog] r26118 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Author: forenr Date: Tue Aug 12 11:02:46 2008 New Revision: 26118 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26118 Log: Spare a few cpu cycles Thanks. JMarc

Re: [Cvslog] r25898 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: config/lyxinclude.m4 config...

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:12PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:50:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > Author: forenr > > > Date: Sat Jul 26 12:45:38 2008 > > > New Revision: 25898 > > > > > > URL:

Re: [Cvslog] r26118 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Author: forenr > Date: Tue Aug 12 11:02:46 2008 > New Revision: 26118 > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26118 > Log: > Spare a few cpu cycles Thanks. JMarc

Re: [Cvslog] r25898 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: config/lyxinclude.m4 config...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Author: forenr Date: Sat Jul 26 12:45:38 2008 New Revision: 25898 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/25898 Log: Automate setting of LYX_DIR_XXx and LYX_USERDIR_XXx environment variable names. This is a good thing, although it does not remove the need to

Re: [Cvslog] r25898 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: config/lyxinclude.m4 config...

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:50:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Author: forenr Date: Sat Jul 26 12:45:38 2008 New Revision: 25898 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/25898 Log: Automate setting of LYX_DIR_XXx and LYX_USERDIR_XXx environment

Re: [Cvslog] r25898 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: config/lyxinclude.m4 config...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Author: forenr > Date: Sat Jul 26 12:45:38 2008 > New Revision: 25898 > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/25898 > Log: > Automate setting of LYX_DIR_XXx and LYX_USERDIR_XXx environment variable > names. This is a good thing, although it does not remove the

Re: [Cvslog] r25898 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: config/lyxinclude.m4 config...

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:50:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Author: forenr > > Date: Sat Jul 26 12:45:38 2008 > > New Revision: 25898 > > > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/25898 > > Log: > > Automate setting of LYX_DIR_XXx and LYX_USERDIR_XXx

Re: [Cvslog] r22945 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: INSTALL config/lyxinclude.m4

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Juergen, I can port this to branch if you want (should have implemented that long ago...). This is very useful when profiling for example. Can we keep that for 1.5.5? If you'd rather keep it for later, at least a big part of the INSTALL cleanup applies. Yes,

Re: [Cvslog] r22945 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: INSTALL config/lyxinclude.m4

Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Juergen, I can port this to branch if you want (should have implemented that long ago...). This is very useful when profiling for example. Can we keep that for 1.5.5? Sure. Yes, please apply this. Done. JMarc

Re: [Cvslog] r22945 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: INSTALL config/lyxinclude.m4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Author: lasgouttes Date: Mon Feb 11 16:11:15 2008 New Revision: 22945 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22945 Log: * config/lyxinclude.m4 (LYX_CHECK_VERSION): add new configure option --enable-build-type=(rel*,pre*,dev*) that allows to override

Re: [Cvslog] r22945 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: INSTALL config/lyxinclude.m4

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen, I can port this to branch if you want (should have > implemented that long ago...). This is very useful when profiling for > example. Can we keep that for 1.5.5? > If you'd rather keep it for later, at least a big part of the INSTALL > cleanup applies.

Re: [Cvslog] r22945 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: INSTALL config/lyxinclude.m4

Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Juergen, I can port this to branch if you want (should have >> implemented that long ago...). This is very useful when profiling for >> example. > > Can we keep that for 1.5.5? Sure. > Yes, please apply this. Done.

Re: [Cvslog] r22945 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: INSTALL config/lyxinclude.m4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Author: lasgouttes > Date: Mon Feb 11 16:11:15 2008 > New Revision: 22945 > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22945 > Log: > * config/lyxinclude.m4 (LYX_CHECK_VERSION): add new configure option > --enable-build-type=(rel

Re: [Cvslog] r19395 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: config/lyxinclude.m4 config...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19395 Log: Remove cruft from config.h This means that it is recompile time :( I tried to do in one commit several small changes to minimize the disruption. I tried to modify the scons stuff, but it would better to double-check

Re: [Cvslog] r19395 - in /lyx-devel/trunk: config/lyxinclude.m4 config...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19395 > Log: > Remove cruft from config.h This means that it is recompile time :( I tried to do in one commit several small changes to minimize the disruption. I tried to modify the scons stuff, but it would better to

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

On Monday 19 February 2007 7:26:47 am Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Very well..., but why keep 'pre' then? I would like to replace it by rc, but I did not want to do it before discussing this in the list. So I will take this and ask: does anyone has any problem if we replace the suffix pre

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

José Matos wrote: So I will take this and ask: does anyone has any problem if we replace the suffix pre by rc? I think the alpha/beta/rc tags are more common and meaningful than pre. Lgb   Glad to see you back. :-) Indeed. Jürgen

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

On Monday 19 February 2007 7:26:47 am Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Very well..., but why keep 'pre' then? I would like to replace it by rc, but I did not want to do it before discussing this in the list. So I will take this and ask: does anyone has any problem if we replace the suffix pre

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

José Matos wrote: > So I will take this and ask: does anyone has any problem if we replace the > suffix pre by rc? I think the alpha/beta/rc tags are more common and meaningful than pre. > > Lgb > >   Glad to see you back. :-) Indeed. Jürgen

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Author: jamatos | Date: Sun Feb 18 23:41:19 2007 | New Revision: 17249 | | URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17249 | Log: | Add test for beta release | | Modified: | lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4 | | Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

On Monday 19 February 2007 1:20:31 am Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: One Q: Why do we need these new names? And what is the difference between a pre and a beta? (or an alpha for that matter.) It is a question of following the same nomenclature as other projects. And it indicates more clearly

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

On Monday 19 February 2007 1:20:31 am Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: One Q: Why do we need these new names? And what is the difference between a pre and a beta? (or an alpha for that matter.) Indulge me if the previous answer was too dry, I know that you know all the arguments presented in

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Monday 19 February 2007 1:20:31 am Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | One Q: Why do we need these new names? | | And what is the difference between a pre and a beta? (or an alpha for | that matter.) | | It is a question of following the same

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Author: jamatos | Date: Sun Feb 18 23:41:19 2007 | New Revision: 17249 | | URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17249 | Log: | Add test for beta release | | Modified: | lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4 | | Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

On Monday 19 February 2007 1:20:31 am Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > One Q: Why do we need these new names? > > And what is the difference between a pre and a beta? (or an alpha for > that matter.) It is a question of following the same nomenclature as other projects. And it indicates more

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

On Monday 19 February 2007 1:20:31 am Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > One Q: Why do we need these new names? > > And what is the difference between a pre and a beta? (or an alpha for > that matter.) Indulge me if the previous answer was too dry, I know that you know all the arguments presented in

Re: r17249 - /lyx-devel/trunk/config/lyxinclude.m4

José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Monday 19 February 2007 1:20:31 am Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > One Q: Why do we need these new names? | > | > And what is the difference between a pre and a beta? (or an alpha for | > that matter.) | | It is a question of following the same

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I have fixed the configure stuff to work with autoconf 2.52 and automake 1.5. Can you confirm that it works? Not at this time, sorry: I've just moved, leaving my computer 600 km back.. JMarc -- Yves Bastide

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:50:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yves Not at this time, sorry: I've just moved, leaving my computer Yves 600 km back.. And you arms are to short to get to the keyboard? Of course not. The power cord is.

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I have fixed the configure stuff to work with autoconf 2.52 and > automake 1.5. Can you confirm that it works? Not at this time, sorry: I've just moved, leaving my computer 600 km back.. > > JMarc -- Yves Bastide

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:50:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yves> Not at this time, sorry: I've just moved, leaving my computer > Yves> 600 km back.. > > And you arms are to short to get to the keyboard? Of course not.

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:06:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: LYX_PROG_CXX finds a C++ compiler that statisfies our needs. Your solution finds a C++ compiler and checks afterwards whether it works. This is useful on non-gnu systems where gcc may not be good enough, but cxx or

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

Am Die, 2001-10-02 um 15.57 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Ralf == Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ralf This logic is obsolete and has changed with autoconf 2.13. You Ralf might want to examine AC_PROG_CXX from 2.52. It still lacks the ability to specify a test to be run on the

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:06:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > LYX_PROG_CXX finds a C++ compiler that statisfies our needs. > > Your solution finds a C++ compiler and checks afterwards whether it > works. > > This is useful on non-gnu systems where gcc may not be good enough, > but

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

Am Die, 2001-10-02 um 15.57 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ralf> This logic is obsolete and has changed with autoconf > 2.13. You > Ralf> might want to examine AC_PROG_CXX from 2.52. > > It still lacks the ability to specify a test

config/lyxinclude.m4

Does config/lyxinclude.m4 still need to use LYX_PROG_CXX instead of AC_* (other than that LYX_* deals with --enable-warnings and others)? The reason being that this macro doesn't work anymore with automake 1.5, which uses a new dependency tracking implementation (which needs an AC_SUBST done

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:39:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Yves == Yves Bastide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yves Does config/lyxinclude.m4 still need to use LYX_PROG_CXX instead Yves of AC_* (other than that LYX_* deals with --enable-warnings and Yves others)? Something nice

config/lyxinclude.m4

Does config/lyxinclude.m4 still need to use LYX_PROG_CXX instead of AC_* (other than that LYX_* deals with --enable-warnings and others)? The reason being that this macro doesn't work anymore with automake 1.5, which uses a new dependency tracking implementation (which needs an AC_SUBST done

Re: config/lyxinclude.m4

On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:39:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Yves" == Yves Bastide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yves> Does config/lyxinclude.m4 still need to use LYX_PROG_CXX instead > Yves> of AC_* (other than that LYX_