On 07/21/2010 01:06 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 10:42 +0200 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 18/07/2010 07:47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
if its question of just one routine we could include it and get rid
of openssh dependence...
Don't know how isolated
On 07/21/2010 01:06 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 10:42 +0200 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 18/07/2010 07:47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
if its question of just one routine we could include it and get rid
of openssh dependence...
Don't know how isolated
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 10:42 +0200 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
On 18/07/2010 07:47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
if its question of just one routine we could include it and get rid
of openssh dependence...
Don't know how isolated the openssl code is. And there is another function
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 10:42 +0200 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> On 18/07/2010 07:47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> if its question of just one routine we could include it and get rid
> >> of openssh dependence...
> >>
> >>
> > Don't know how isolated the openssl code is. And there is another
On 18/07/2010 07:47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
if its question of just one routine we could include it and get rid
of openssh dependence...
Don't know how isolated the openssl code is. And there is another function which
generates the key from the pwd.
AES encoding and decoding code is
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Do we have a function to pack all needed files into one zip file in the
meantime?
I only could remember there were long discussions on the list.
Then we could pack before.
iirc there was some python script crafted by Enrico to pack all things. but its
not stepping stone
On 18/07/2010 07:47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
if its question of just one routine we could include it and get rid
of openssh dependence...
Don't know how isolated the openssl code is. And there is another function which
generates the key from the pwd.
AES encoding and decoding code is
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Do we have a function to pack all needed files into one zip file in the
> meantime?
> I only could remember there were long discussions on the list.
> Then we could pack before.
iirc there was some python script crafted by Enrico to pack all things. but its
not stepping
Author: kuemmel
Date: Sat Jul 17 14:26:11 2010
New Revision: 34931
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34931
Log:
add first version of .lyx file encryption. It's disabled by default and could
out-of-the-box only by compiled on Linux with cmake and with openssl-devel
packeges.
Pavel Sanda wrote:
+case LFUN_BUFFER_WRITE_ENCRYPTED:
+enable = doc_buffer;
here should be something like
ifndef encryption
lfun.setflags(off);
#endif
which will remove it from menu, so you dont have to care about
commenting/uncommenting
line in menu.ui file.
Yes,
> Author: kuemmel
> Date: Sat Jul 17 14:26:11 2010
> New Revision: 34931
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34931
>
> Log:
> add first version of .lyx file encryption. It's disabled by default and could
> out-of-the-box only by compiled on Linux with cmake and with openssl-devel
>
Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> +case LFUN_BUFFER_WRITE_ENCRYPTED:
>> +enable = doc_buffer;
>
> here should be something like
> ifndef encryption
> lfun.setflags(off);
> #endif
>
> which will remove it from menu, so you dont have to care about
> commenting/uncommenting
> line in
12 matches
Mail list logo
