Am 14.11.2010 um 23:01 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 14/11/2010 00:07, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Yes, I know. I've to admit that you're a little bit right, too.
My work-around patch was targeted for 1.6 and 2.0 includes it already.
It was said to make both environments similar... what would
Stephan Witt wrote:
Another question regarding lyx's trac:
I've changed the component of #7035 to version control.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7035
After that it's owned by nob...@lyx.org.
Shouldn't it be some real person?
I allocated it to sanda now.
Jürgen
Am 14.11.2010 um 23:01 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 14/11/2010 00:07, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> Yes, I know. I've to admit that you're a little bit right, too.
>> My work-around patch was targeted for 1.6 and 2.0 includes it already.
>> It was said to make both environments similar... what
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Another question regarding lyx's trac:
> I've changed the component of #7035 to version control.
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7035
> After that it's owned by nob...@lyx.org.
> Shouldn't it be some real person?
I allocated it to sanda now.
Jürgen
Le 14/11/2010 00:07, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Yes, I know. I've to admit that you're a little bit right, too.
My work-around patch was targeted for 1.6 and 2.0 includes it already.
It was said to make both environments similar... what would you
say?
I think it's weird for a maintainer to have
Le 14/11/2010 00:07, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Yes, I know. I've to admit that you're a little bit right, too.
My work-around patch was targeted for 1.6 and 2.0 includes it already.
It was said to make both environments similar... what would you
say?
I think it's weird for a maintainer to have
Le 08/11/2010 09:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as included gettext.
It's the requirement for gettext tools, AFAIK.
Otherwise the build stops because of bugs in the tools.
My work-around was denied with the argument
Am 13.11.2010 um 22:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 08/11/2010 09:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as included gettext.
It's the requirement for gettext tools, AFAIK.
Otherwise the build stops because of bugs in the
Le 08/11/2010 09:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as included gettext.
It's the requirement for gettext tools, AFAIK.
Otherwise the build stops because of bugs in the tools.
My work-around was denied with the argument
Am 13.11.2010 um 22:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 08/11/2010 09:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
>>> this version as included gettext.
>>
>> It's the requirement for gettext tools, AFAIK.
>> Otherwise the build stops because of
Am 07.11.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 7 nov. 10 à 22:08, sw...@lyx.org a écrit :
Author: switt
Date: Sun Nov 7 22:08:23 2010
New Revision: 36200
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36200
Log:
we now require gettext version 0.18 at least
Why is that? Shall we
Am 07.11.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> Le 7 nov. 10 à 22:08, sw...@lyx.org a écrit :
>
>> Author: switt
>> Date: Sun Nov 7 22:08:23 2010
>> New Revision: 36200
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36200
>>
>> Log:
>> we now require gettext version 0.18 at least
>
> Why
Le 7 nov. 10 à 22:08, sw...@lyx.org a écrit :
Author: switt
Date: Sun Nov 7 22:08:23 2010
New Revision: 36200
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36200
Log:
we now require gettext version 0.18 at least
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as
Le 7 nov. 10 à 22:08, sw...@lyx.org a écrit :
Author: switt
Date: Sun Nov 7 22:08:23 2010
New Revision: 36200
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36200
Log:
we now require gettext version 0.18 at least
Why is that? Shall we do the same for all of LyX? We could use
this version as
14 matches
Mail list logo
