xtl vs string

2000-03-13 Thread Allan Rae
No it's not quite what you were expecting from the subject. I have an almost compiling implementation that uses a new: bool LyXFunc::Dispatch(int action, int size, char * buf) where size and buf are the memory buffer filled with the externalized data to be passed to/from the new

Re: xtl vs string

2000-03-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | No it's not quite what you were expecting from the subject. | | I have an almost compiling implementation that uses a new: | bool LyXFunc::Dispatch(int action, int size, char * buf) | | where size and buf are the memory buffer filled with the

Re: xtl vs string

2000-03-13 Thread Allan Rae
On 14 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | No it's not quite what you were expecting from the subject. | | I have an almost compiling implementation that uses a new: | bool LyXFunc::Dispatch(int action, int size, char * buf) | | where size and

xtl vs string

2000-03-13 Thread Allan Rae
No it's not quite what you were expecting from the subject. I have an almost compiling implementation that uses a new: bool LyXFunc::Dispatch(int action, int size, char * buf) where size and buf are the memory buffer filled with the externalized data to be passed to/from the new

Re: xtl vs string

2000-03-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | No it's not quite what you were expecting from the subject. | | I have an almost compiling implementation that uses a new: | bool LyXFunc::Dispatch(int action, int size, char * buf) | | where size and buf are the memory buffer filled with the

Re: xtl vs string

2000-03-13 Thread Allan Rae
On 14 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | No it's not quite what you were expecting from the subject. > | > | I have an almost compiling implementation that uses a new: > | bool LyXFunc::Dispatch(int action, int size, char * buf) > | > |