* Turn math previews on
* Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
math-preview is generated.
* Copy the inset and paste it elsewhere --- the formula is displayed, but not
in its previewed state.
* Move the cursor through the inset. On exit, the inset is displayed
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:09:38AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
* Turn math previews on
* Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
math-preview is generated.
* Copy the inset and paste it elsewhere --- the formula is displayed, but not
in its previewed state.
On Monday 11 November 2002 10:11 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:09:38AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
* Turn math previews on
* Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
math-preview is generated.
* Copy the inset and paste it elsewhere ---
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, I still consider the preview stuff as highly experimental, so
unless there are hard crashs I'd better leave it as it is...
Ummm. Highly experimental usually means has been hacked together so it
works, sort of, but is
On Monday 11 November 2002 10:34 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, I still consider the preview stuff as highly experimental, so
unless there are hard crashs I'd better leave it as it is...
Ummm. Highly experimental usually
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 11:37:15AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
I understand and agree with you here. However, given that we generate /some/
preview, we should be able to display it multiple times by
copying-and-pasting. The bug lies in our implementation, not in the concept.
Morever, since
2. the bullets
I need to set the bullet codes. for now I have put them in the new files
bulletstrings.[Ch]. I don't know what is best. move them out of bullet.[Ch]
to tex-strings[Ch]?
could someone comment on this before I commit (it's not qt related)
Thanks, Ed.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:05:00PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
2. the bullets
I need to set the bullet codes. for now I have put them in the new files
bulletstrings.[Ch]. I don't know what is best. move them out of bullet.[Ch]
to tex-strings[Ch]?
could someone comment on this before I
Does this count as comment? ;-)
I guess not ;-)
At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings within the
Bullet class. If you have a look in Bullet.C you will see this in
bulletEntry(int,int).
Thing is that I need them so that users can set custom bullets using the UI.
I'll be gone for a week. I had some vacation left...
I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
commit to the tree while I am away.
I might check in from time to time...
--
Lgb
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
commit to the tree while I am away.
So please clarify what exactly falls under ocnservative
lest we venture to forbidded places ;-)
And _much_ more important:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:33:04PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
Does this count as comment? ;-)
I guess not ;-)
At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings
within the Bullet class. If you have a look in Bullet.C you will see this
in bulletEntry(int,int).
I wonder
I wonder why such a bullet can't be a thin wrapper around a std::string
like \ding{49}? Is this just a performance enhancement?
don't ask me
You need the strings?
yep
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:51:03PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message:
Backed out a change of my last patch which I now see is not correct. This
should fix the undo bugs we see.
This should also be done for 1.2.2.
Is it OK to apply this patch ?
Yes please do
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:51:43PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
You need the strings?
yep
Your bulletstring.[hC] approach looks ok to me.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Your bulletstring.[hC] approach looks ok to me.
I'll commit then.
Thanks, Ed.
Edwin Leuven wrote:
For some reason QBrowseBox doesn't get mouse focus.
Fix attached.
(Have a look at
http://doc.trolltech.com/3.0/qscrollview.html#details
for details)
Regards,
Jürgen.
Index: src/frontends/qt2/QBrowseBox.C
===
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Attached is a patch which fixes bug 490 this way.
No comments? No interest?
Jürgen.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:35:36PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
No comments? No interest?
Pointer to patch? It's not in bugzilla, is it?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:35:36PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
No comments? No interest?
Pointer to patch? It's not in bugzilla, is it?
No. It was attached to my previous mail in this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel;lists.lyx.org/msg47939.html
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:49:26PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Please have a look, if the changes to lyxlength (the default unit) can
go in to fix bug 490.
I can't judge the Qt part, but the rest looks sensible. Maybe you could
have a look whether there are other places using strange
Fix attached.
Thanks!
Applying bullets is still rotten though, so I won't apply for the moment.
Cheers, Ed.
Didn't there used to be an ignore always button on the dialog? It's getting
a little tedious hitting the ignore button every time rms comes up...
Angus
* Spell check a document to the end.
* Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
* Hit the start button on the spellchecker dialog once again --- CRASH.
Angus
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:56:43PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
* Spell check a document to the end.
* Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
* Hit the start button on the spellchecker dialog once again --- CRASH.
Reported several times. i/aspelll versions please. CVS ,
On Monday 11 November 2002 4:51 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:56:43PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
* Spell check a document to the end.
* Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
* Hit the start button on the spellchecker dialog once again --- CRASH.
On Monday 11 November 2002 5:25 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Didn't there used to be an ignore always button on the dialog? It's
getting a little tedious hitting the ignore button every time rms
comes up...
Angus
I use `Accept word in this session' for that.
Garst
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:39:35PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
It's getting a little tedious hitting the ignore button every time rms
comes up...
Anyone else see the (unintentional) humour here?
;-P
Jules
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
| commit to the tree while I am away.
|
| So please clarify what exactly falls under ocnservative
| lest we venture
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:33:04PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
Does this count as comment? ;-)
I guess not ;-)
At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings
within the Bullet class. If you have a look in Bullet.C you
* Turn math previews on
* Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
math-preview is generated.
* Copy the inset and paste it elsewhere --- the formula is displayed, but not
in its previewed state.
* Move the cursor through the inset. On exit, the inset is displayed
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:09:38AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> * Turn math previews on
> * Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
> math-preview is generated.
> * Copy the inset and paste it elsewhere --- the formula is displayed, but not
> in its previewed
On Monday 11 November 2002 10:11 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:09:38AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > * Turn math previews on
> > * Write a formula and move the cursor out of the math-inset, so that the
> > math-preview is generated.
> > * Copy the inset and paste it
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well, I still consider the preview stuff as "highly experimental", so
> > unless there are hard crashs I'd better leave it as it is...
>
> Ummm. Highly experimental usually means "has been hacked together so it
> works, sort of,
On Monday 11 November 2002 10:34 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Well, I still consider the preview stuff as "highly experimental", so
> > > unless there are hard crashs I'd better leave it as it is...
> >
> > Ummm. Highly
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 11:37:15AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I understand and agree with you here. However, given that we generate /some/
> preview, we should be able to display it multiple times by
> copying-and-pasting. The bug lies in our implementation, not in the concept.
> Morever,
> 2. the bullets
>
> I need to set the bullet codes. for now I have put them in the new files
> bulletstrings.[Ch]. I don't know what is best. move them out of bullet.[Ch]
> to tex-strings[Ch]?
could someone comment on this before I commit (it's not qt related)
Thanks, Ed.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:05:00PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > 2. the bullets
> >
> > I need to set the bullet codes. for now I have put them in the new files
> > bulletstrings.[Ch]. I don't know what is best. move them out of bullet.[Ch]
> > to tex-strings[Ch]?
>
> could someone comment on
> Does this count as comment? ;-)
I guess not ;-)
At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings within the
Bullet class. If you have a look in Bullet.C you will see this in
bulletEntry(int,int).
Thing is that I need them so that users can set custom bullets using the
I'll be gone for a week. I had some vacation left...
I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
commit to the tree while I am away.
I might check in from time to time...
--
Lgb
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
> commit to the tree while I am away.
So please clarify what exactly falls under "ocnservative"
lest we venture to forbidded places ;-)
And _much_ more
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:33:04PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Does this count as comment? ;-)
>
> I guess not ;-)
>
> At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings
> within the Bullet class. If you have a look in Bullet.C you will see this
> in bulletEntry(int,int).
I
> I wonder why such a bullet can't be a thin wrapper around a std::string
> like "\ding{49}"? Is this just a performance enhancement?
don't ask me
> You need the strings?
yep
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:51:03PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message:
Backed out a change of my last patch which I now see is not correct. This
should fix the undo bugs we see.
This should also be done for 1.2.2.
Is it OK to apply this patch ?
Yes please do
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:51:43PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > You need the strings?
>
> yep
Your bulletstring.[hC] approach looks ok to me.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> Your bulletstring.[hC] approach looks ok to me.
I'll commit then.
Thanks, Ed.
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> For some reason QBrowseBox doesn't get mouse focus.
Fix attached.
(Have a look at
http://doc.trolltech.com/3.0/qscrollview.html#details
for details)
Regards,
Jürgen.
Index: src/frontends/qt2/QBrowseBox.C
===
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Attached is a patch which fixes bug 490 this way.
No comments? No interest?
Jürgen.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:35:36PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> No comments? No interest?
Pointer to patch? It's not in bugzilla, is it?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:35:36PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > No comments? No interest?
>
> Pointer to patch? It's not in bugzilla, is it?
No. It was attached to my previous mail in this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel;lists.lyx.org/msg47939.html
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:49:26PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Please have a look, if the changes to lyxlength (the default unit) can
> go in to fix bug 490.
I can't judge the Qt part, but the rest looks sensible. Maybe you could
have a look whether there are other places using strange
> Fix attached.
Thanks!
Applying bullets is still rotten though, so I won't apply for the moment.
Cheers, Ed.
Didn't there used to be an "ignore always" button on the dialog? It's getting
a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms" comes up...
Angus
* Spell check a document to the end.
* Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
* Hit the "start" button on the spellchecker dialog once again --- CRASH.
Angus
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:56:43PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> * Spell check a document to the end.
> * Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
> * Hit the "start" button on the spellchecker dialog once again --- CRASH.
Reported several times. i/aspelll versions please.
On Monday 11 November 2002 4:51 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 04:56:43PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > * Spell check a document to the end.
> > * Reposition the cursor at the start of the document once more.
> > * Hit the "start" button on the spellchecker dialog once again ---
On Monday 11 November 2002 5:25 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Didn't there used to be an "ignore always" button on the dialog? It's
> > getting a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms"
> > comes up...
> >
> > Angus
>
> I use `Accept word in this session'
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:39:35PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It's getting a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms"
> comes up...
Anyone else see the (unintentional) humour here?
;-P
Jules
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
| > commit to the tree while I am away.
|
| So please clarify what exactly falls under "ocnservative"
| lest we
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:33:04PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > Does this count as comment? ;-)
> >
> > I guess not ;-)
> >
> > At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings
> > within the Bullet class. If you have a look in
60 matches
Mail list logo
