Re: LyX 1.6.6: please prepare for landing

Pavel Sanda wrote: I prefer to apply all those changes to trunk first, let them be tested you are probably the one to commit it? Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34099 http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34100 Günter, please check if everything is in place now. Jürgen

Re: alpha2

Am 08.04.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: This patch is tested on Mac OS X 10.6.3 and OpenSuSE 11.2. It's unfinished now, as it doesn't include the aspell build script. This one I want to integrate somehow in development/LyX-Mac-binary-release.sh. But the changes to

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: Currently I'm lost. Does anybody have an idea? Is it something with the latest automake changes? (The alpha1 tarball is working with my build script!) make clean is only soft version, there has been changes in makefiles recently so better to try make distclean;

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 12:38 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Currently I'm lost. Does anybody have an idea? Is it something with the latest automake changes? (The alpha1 tarball is working with my build script!) make clean is only soft version, there has been changes in makefiles

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. IMHO the cycle ../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make should work. no it shouldn't in cases automake files change, which just happened. pavel

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. IMHO the cycle ../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make should work. no it shouldn't in cases automake files change, which just happened. But automake

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 13:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 09.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. IMHO the cycle ../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make should work. no it shouldn't in cases automake

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: Am 09.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. IMHO the cycle ../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make should work. no it shouldn't in cases automake files change, which

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 13:35 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Am 09.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. IMHO the cycle ../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make should work. no it shouldn't

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: i mean change of automake files in svn, not during compilation. pavel So, you agree that there is a problem? maybe. which tree exactly do you have? make distclean didn't helped? pavel

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 14:07 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: i mean change of automake files in svn, not during compilation. pavel So, you agree that there is a problem? maybe. which tree exactly do you have? make distclean didn't helped? make distclean does not work for builds not

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 04/08/2010 04:51 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: On 04/08/2010 04:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Buffer.cpp == --- lyx-devel/trunk/src/Buffer.cpp Thu Apr

Re: LyX 1.6.6: please prepare for landing

On 2010-04-09, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: I prefer to apply all those changes to trunk first, let them be tested you are probably the one to commit it? Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34099 http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34100 Günter, please check if

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: So, you agree that there is a problem? maybe. which tree exactly do you have? make distclean didn't helped? make distclean does not work for builds not in tree. I'm using trunk. of course, but you mentioned its not checkout, so i'm bit perplexed what you mean. to

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:25:38PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: for...@lyx.org wrote: Author: forenr Date: Thu Apr 8 22:22:20 2010 New Revision: 34095 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34095 Log: Use cheaper conversion method. Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Buffer.cpp

Re: alpha2

Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes: to sum it up JMarc was recently changing the location of object files which looks connected. Yes, probably :) JMarc

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net writes: make distclean does not work for builds not in tree. Uh? JMarc

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Enrico Forestieri wrote: I am not the one to be asked about the dispatch issue. Maybe you should have paid attention to other commits. i didn't mean its your fault ;) pavel

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 04/09/2010 10:00 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:25:38PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: for...@lyx.org wrote: Author: forenr Date: Thu Apr 8 22:22:20 2010 New Revision: 34095 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34095 Log: Use cheaper conversion method.

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 15:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: So, you agree that there is a problem? maybe. which tree exactly do you have? make distclean didn't helped? make distclean does not work for builds not in tree. Am 09.04.2010 um 16:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Uh?

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: Sorry, so it is. Should it? It stops with these messages: Makefile:1899: insets/.deps/InsetWrap.Po: No such file or directory Makefile:1900: insets/.deps/RenderButton.Po: No such file or directory Makefile:1901: insets/.deps/RenderGraphic.Po: No such file or directory

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 16:24 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: after svn update leftovers from old builds can remain after any cleaning and mysterious bugs can happen (it did for me in the past). thats why i proposed completely new checkout. Since my checkout tree is untouched by builds

[PATCH] FuncRequest Argument Parsing

The attached is a patch I've had sitting around for a while. Currently, we use FuncRequest::getArg(int) to retrieve arguments from an LFUN argument string. The downside to this is that every such call completely reparses the string, and we can do this as many as four times. I thought about

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

rgheck schrieb: i guess you are asking for r34086. OK, well, I looked at that, and I think I now understand what is going on here. Uwe was trying to get the DISPLAY color for e.g. greyed out notes to match the color that the DOCUMENT wanted those notes to be printed in. Yes. But it is

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 04/09/2010 03:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: rgheck schrieb: The display fonts for notes, etc, are actually controlled by the InsetLayouts associated with them. At the moment, however, the declared color has to be one of the color names known to LyX. A simple idea would be to allow this:

Re: r34107 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Le 9 avr. 10 à 21:03, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit : Log: Mark new files dirty. Otherwise, you can't save them, and maybe you want to do that right away. The rationale was that one should be ale to close the file immediately without a yes/no dialog, AFAIR. But I understand your concern too.

Re: r34107 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 9 avr. 10 à 21:03, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit : Log: Mark new files dirty. Otherwise, you can't save them, and maybe you want to do that right away. The rationale was that one should be ale to close the file immediately without a yes/no dialog, AFAIR. But I

Re: r34107 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:10:55AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 9 avr. 10 à 21:03, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit : Log: Mark new files dirty. Otherwise, you can't save them, and maybe you want to do that right away. The rationale was that one should be

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com escribió: Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. I've also committed part of this patch I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python module instead of as an executable

Re: LyX 1.6.6: please prepare for landing

Pavel Sanda wrote: > > I prefer to apply all those changes to trunk first, let them be tested > > you are probably the one to commit it? Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34099 http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34100 Günter, please check if everything is in place now. Jürgen

Re: alpha2

Am 08.04.2010 um 22:20 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> This patch is tested on Mac OS X 10.6.3 and OpenSuSE 11.2. >> >> It's unfinished now, as it doesn't include the aspell build script. >> This one I want to integrate somehow in >> "development/LyX-Mac-binary-release.sh". >> But

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: > Currently I'm lost. Does anybody have an idea? Is it something with the > latest automake changes? > (The alpha1 tarball is working with my build script!) make clean is only soft version, there has been changes in makefiles recently so better to try make distclean;

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 12:38 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Currently I'm lost. Does anybody have an idea? Is it something with the >> latest automake changes? >> (The alpha1 tarball is working with my build script!) > > make clean is only soft version, there has been changes in

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: > But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. > IMHO the cycle "../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make" should > work. no it shouldn't in cases automake files change, which just happened. pavel

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. >> IMHO the cycle "../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make" should >> work. > > no it shouldn't in cases automake files change, which just happened. But

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 13:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 09.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > >> Stephan Witt wrote: >>> But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. >>> IMHO the cycle "../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make" should >>> work. >> >> no it shouldn't

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 09.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. > >> IMHO the cycle "../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make" should > >> work. > > > > no it shouldn't in cases automake

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 13:35 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 09.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> Stephan Witt wrote: But I would rate it as a workaround for a dependency problem. IMHO the cycle "../lyx-devel/configure ; make ; make clean ; make" should

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: > > i mean change of automake files in svn, not during compilation. > > pavel > > So, you agree that there is a problem? maybe. which tree exactly do you have? make distclean didn't helped? pavel

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 14:07 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >>> i mean change of automake files in svn, not during compilation. >>> pavel >> >> So, you agree that there is a problem? > > maybe. which tree exactly do you have? make distclean didn't helped? "make distclean" does not work

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 04/08/2010 04:51 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: On 04/08/2010 04:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/Buffer.cpp == --- lyx-devel/trunk/src/Buffer.cpp Thu Apr

Re: LyX 1.6.6: please prepare for landing

On 2010-04-09, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> > I prefer to apply all those changes to trunk first, let them be tested >> you are probably the one to commit it? > Done: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34099 > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34100 > Günter, please check

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: > >> So, you agree that there is a problem? > > > > maybe. which tree exactly do you have? make distclean didn't helped? > > "make distclean" does not work for builds not in tree. > > I'm using trunk. of course, but you mentioned its not checkout, so i'm bit perplexed what

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:25:38PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > for...@lyx.org wrote: > > Author: forenr > > Date: Thu Apr 8 22:22:20 2010 > > New Revision: 34095 > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34095 > > > > Log: > > Use cheaper conversion method. > > > > Modified: > >

Re: alpha2

Pavel Sanda writes: > to sum it up JMarc was recently changing the location of object files > which looks connected. Yes, probably :) JMarc

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt writes: > "make distclean" does not work for builds not in tree. Uh? JMarc

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I am not the one to be asked about the dispatch issue. Maybe you should have > paid attention to other commits. i didn't mean its your fault ;) pavel

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 04/09/2010 10:00 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:25:38PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: for...@lyx.org wrote: Author: forenr Date: Thu Apr 8 22:22:20 2010 New Revision: 34095 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34095 Log: Use cheaper conversion method.

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 15:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: So, you agree that there is a problem? >>> >>> maybe. which tree exactly do you have? make distclean didn't helped? >> >> "make distclean" does not work for builds not in tree. Am 09.04.2010 um 16:02 schrieb Jean-Marc

Re: alpha2

Stephan Witt wrote: > Sorry, so it is. Should it? > > It stops with these messages: > > Makefile:1899: insets/.deps/InsetWrap.Po: No such file or directory > Makefile:1900: insets/.deps/RenderButton.Po: No such file or directory > Makefile:1901: insets/.deps/RenderGraphic.Po: No such file or

Re: alpha2

Am 09.04.2010 um 16:24 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> >>> after svn update leftovers from old builds can remain after any cleaning >>> and mysterious bugs can happen (it did for me in the past). thats why >>> i proposed completely new checkout. >> >> Since my checkout tree is

[PATCH] FuncRequest Argument Parsing

The attached is a patch I've had sitting around for a while. Currently, we use FuncRequest::getArg(int) to retrieve arguments from an LFUN argument string. The downside to this is that every such call completely reparses the string, and we can do this as many as four times. I thought about

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

rgheck schrieb: i guess you are asking for r34086. OK, well, I looked at that, and I think I now understand what is going on here. Uwe was trying to get the DISPLAY color for e.g. greyed out notes to match the color that the DOCUMENT wanted those notes to be printed in. Yes. But it is

Re: r34095 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 04/09/2010 03:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: rgheck schrieb: The display fonts for notes, etc, are actually controlled by the InsetLayouts associated with them. At the moment, however, the declared color has to be one of the color names known to LyX. A simple idea would be to allow this:

Re: r34107 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Le 9 avr. 10 à 21:03, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit : Log: Mark new files dirty. Otherwise, you can't save them, and maybe you want to do that right away. The rationale was that one should be ale to close the file immediately without a yes/no dialog, AFAIR. But I understand your concern too.

Re: r34107 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 9 avr. 10 à 21:03, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit : Log: Mark new files dirty. Otherwise, you can't save them, and maybe you want to do that right away. The rationale was that one should be ale to close the file immediately without a yes/no dialog, AFAIR. But I

Re: r34107 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:10:55AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: > > > >Le 9 avr. 10 à 21:03, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit : > >>Log: > >>Mark new files dirty. Otherwise, you can't save them, and maybe you want > >>to do that right away. > > > >The rationale was

Re: Patch Submission: LyxBlogger Converters

El Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:51 -0400 rgheck escribió: > Thanks for sending the license statement. I've added you to the credits. > I've also committed part of this patch I have decided that future versions of LyXBlogger will run as a python module instead of as an