Re: Backwards compatibility with 2.1 and older?

On 04/26/2017 03:49 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear LyX developers, > > How important is backwards compatibility for documents generated with LyX > 2.1 or older? > >a) no need to restore after it's broken by 2.2. >b) good but not required >c) small changes tolerable as long as

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

On 05/31/2017 12:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2017, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: >>> OK. Thanks. Since this is used as a session setting, we might have the >>> unwanted side-effect that it is now off by default for everybody starting >>> LyX 2.3 with an old

Re: 2 error in lyx 2.3

On 05/31/2017 07:40 AM, edu Gpl wrote: > Dear Lyx Team > thank you for all. > i got 2 error after i upgrade from lyx 2.2.2 to 2.3 . > > 1st: > when i generate my book, i got this msg: > This is a warning that means exactly what it says. If it worked in 2.2.x, that was only a happy accident. You

Re: 2 error in lyx 2.3

Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2017 um 14:40:40, schrieb edu Gpl > Dear Lyx Team > thank you for all. > i got 2 error after i upgrade from lyx 2.2.2 to 2.3 . > > 1st: > when i generate my book, i got this msg: > > ​ > 2nd: > this code not work in latex preamble (work in 2.2.2 but

2 error in lyx 2.3

Dear Lyx Team thank you for all. i got 2 error after i upgrade from lyx 2.2.2 to 2.3 . 1st: when i generate my book, i got this msg: ​ 2nd: this code not work in latex preamble (work in 2.2.2 but not work in 2.3): \usepackage[explicit]{titlesec} > \usepackage[many]{tcolorbox} >

tectonic - interesting development

https://users.rust-lang.org/t/tectonic-a-complete-modernized-self-contained-tex-latex-engine/11053