On Saturday 07 July 2007 12:34:35 Michael Gerz wrote:
Accept all changes by Mike and MG:
\tracking_changes true
\output_changes false
\author
\author
\author Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any reason to leave the empty authors field there?
All of this make
On Saturday 07 July 2007 18:55:10 Pavel Sanda wrote:
the plan was that after rc2 no change of transl. strings should happen.
pavel
Yes.
I would like to release before Thursday (that is with Wednesday as the
deadline). How much time do you need?
--
José Abílio
On Monday 09 July 2007 09:50:27 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I guess the problem is that nobody understands this bidi stuff like
you do. I would tend to say go ahead!, but I am not sure what are my
credentials to do so :)
Same position for me. The patch looks not so complicate so I'd say go
On Sunday 08 July 2007 18:10:37 Koji Yokota wrote:
Yap, it solved the problem. Thank you!!
OK Enrico you can commit the patch.
Koji
--
José Abílio
On Monday 09 July 2007 07:49:25 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3990
Attached.
OK.
Abdel.
--
José Abílio
On Monday 09 July 2007 11:07:28 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
OK, go ahead.
+1
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Monday 09 July 2007 09:34:12 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862
Attached.
Abdel.
The patch seems straightforward but this is also the type of bug that can wait
for 1.5.1.
Let us wait for other opinions.
--
José Abílio
On Monday 09 July 2007 09:56:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3992
Attached.
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Monday 09 July 2007 11:19:22 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José, is this patch OK?
Yes.
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 08 July 2007 17:01:56 Michael Gerz wrote:
Edwin Leuven schrieb:
second thing is when i delete a collapsed footnote. the collapse
footnote gets crossed out in lyx but not the text inside. in the dvi
the footnote isn't crossed out.
Ouch. This is a very serious CT problem!
On Monday 09 July 2007 13:55:01 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The part below was not meant to be in the patch, please ignore:
If that fixes the bug then OK.
--
José Abílio
On Monday 09 July 2007 16:03:50 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Here is an updated patch that works on all use cases.
Abdel.
Please target this for 1.5.1. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Monday 09 July 2007 14:21:58 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Which one? The one that add a redundant updateToc() in LyXView or the
one that updates the dialogs only if this is not LFUN_UPDATE_DIALOG in
LyXFunc?
Conceptually speaking, the later is more correct, even if this means a
special case
On Monday 09 July 2007 18:12:48 Bo Peng wrote:
Jose, if you can not decide, just toss a coin. IMO, both approaches
are good enough. :-)
OK then, let us go Jean-Marc's way, and proceed for other more pressing
issues.
Bo
In this issue I feel like Golan Trevize:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 09:33:17 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
So what shall we do with this patch?
OK.
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:23:02 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
So?
This patch fixes a crash and a regression against 1.4. Unless you want
to implement the layout2layout support and do the GUIName addition
before 1.5.0, this patch should go in now.
It's just a string - docstring conversion and
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 10:50:28 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Right.
Does anyone has any objection to this change?
The purpose of this release is the support of unicode, we are using utf8 for
the saved files so it makes all sense to follow the same route for layout
files.
In the special
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 11:47:36 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It would be even better to provide explicit commands or some kind of
script to update .lyx file. I suspect it is not trivial.
JMarc
Using iconv?
Something like this for bash
cd /path/to/layouts
for l in *
do
cp $l tmp.txt
On Friday 06 July 2007 23:21:24 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I received this from the NetBSD and OpenBSD maintainers. José, is there
something we can do about python?
I am not sure if it is worth it.
First LyX does not care about python file headers, we always call python
directly. Those
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 12:53:56 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
You do not want to translate the whole file, only the
\begin_layout NameWithAccent
lines.
JMarc
Why not?
It is easier to use has a file with coherent encoding that one that uses a
mixed encoding.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 13:15:58 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
But the rest of the file is converted separately by lyx2lyx. I thought
that this translation was more subtle than just running iconv.
JMarc
OK, now I see what you mean. :-)
My problem was with the .layout file and you refered the
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 13:15:00 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José The call for python is made over src/support/os.cpp so all
José further configurations should be done there. We need to change
José configure.ac and companions and the use config.h to configure
José os.cpp to use the choose
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 13:25:04 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What about the documentation? It is probably time to convert them, isn't
it?
As far as I remember there are no patches holding that change the file
format. If so then yes it is time to start updating the documentation to the
latest
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 13:44:59 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
But it uses the one found by configure, right?
Since we did not had any reports saying otherwise I suppose you are
right. :-)
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:33:31 Bo Peng wrote:
I suggest that we disable it for 1.5.0 because it is better to give
Chinese users a pure-English interface than a half-translated, or
empty one.
Cheers,
Bo
How do we disable the interface? By not including it in the distribution?
Actually I
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:16:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the risk of embarrassing[*] bugs? (As this is just before the
release of 1.5.0). There is no RC3 planned, right?
Do you want a formula with deltas and epsilons? ;-)
No there is not any RC3 planned. Do you think we need one?
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:56:04 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak But for the time being, let's please get 1.5.0 out.
Sure. In this respect, your patch is OK.
+1
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 16:13:50 Bo Peng wrote:
We can exclude them from source tar.gz and hope our build systems will
not choke. The only way to check the latter is to build lyx/rc2 from
its tarball with some po files removed.
Michael and Jean-Marc are the wizards for this area. :-)
I
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 19:48:44 Michael Gerz wrote:
On Win XP, LyX 1.5.0svn, \propto looks identical in LyX and in DVI
output (similar to a greek alpha symbol)
And so it does on Linux (Fedora 7). I think the main point that Darren
points are the missing fonts in his installation.
Michael
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 10:25:44 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Please, find attached your patch complemented with the changes
for cygwin.
This can go with two OKs. I guess that Joost, Uwe, Peter or Abdel are the
obvious candidates.
--
Enrico
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 07:31:39 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
this is really just to make the paragraph dialog look a little bit more
compact, i.e. I reduced the ugly whitespace on the bottom, no other change.
OK to commit?
OK.
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08:30:29 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc Here is the patch I am going to commit.
Hmmph.
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 10:30:47 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Tommaso Plus, what about maths ? Would they be represented as smth.
Tommaso like MathML instead of plain LaTeX that you have now ?
I think there are problems related to that (latex (and lyx) LyX is
more on the presentational
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:32:34 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jose', is the following patch OK?
JMarc
Yes.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:13:49 Philippe Charpentier wrote:
(in fact almost: there is still a problem with old files using the tag
\language frenchb and perhaps others...?)
as they are (i.e. without any conversion).
lyx2lyx converts those documents coming from 1.3.x or before. Isn't that
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:33:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding this subject I think that this course of action is sound so I
don't expect any major surprises. (Famous last words).
If something does happen, your words might well make it into LyX's famous
quotes :-)
AFAIU the right
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 20:44:31 Michael Gerz wrote:
Hi,
it seems that there are still several patches that may go into 1.5.0.
Since José has left us for the rest of the week, I wonder what will
happen to these patches:
- RTL Justification Bug (bug3889.2.patch, 26/06/07) by Dov
- Bug
On Thursday 05 July 2007 08:30:13 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So, to conclude, José, can I apply the patch below? It is quite
straightforward and I think it is needed
for proper pkg-config support (the only problem is that it is not
completely correct with multiple frontends,
but this is
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 14:53:44 Neal Becker wrote:
This looks interesting. Anyone want to make a lyx conversion for this?
http://www.arakhne.org/spip.php?article52
Why don't you do it? :-)
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 06:03:17 John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
This *could* be fixed on the LyX end by outputing the apparently
equivalent tex code:
http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~john/lyx/lyxbug_american2.tex
(so that the selectlanguage macro is only applied to the text within
environments, and
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:00:33 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
IMO this could go in 1.5.0, although 1.5.1 would not be a big problem
(cosmetic issue).
JMarc
Last time that Abdel propose this it had some problem. Has this been fixed?
If yes then OK.
--
José Abílio
On Friday 29 June 2007 04:15:18 Rob wrote:
It wouldn't be too much of a problem to let the export
go along with the already existing eps file, would it?
If so, this option should then be added here
Rob.
Rob could you add this to bugzilla as an enhancement? That way it will not be
On Friday 29 June 2007 03:20:05 Rob wrote:
Rob wrote:
Hi,
The upgrade from Fedora 6 to 7 confronted me with an automagically upgrade
of LyX from 1.4.4 to 1.5.0beta2.
So, after the Fedora upgrade, I started LyX (looks good!) and opened my
1.4.4 document. It looks alright, but the citations
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:20:49 Alexander Streit wrote:
wrong pos 782, max is 710 at level 1. Trying to correct this.
old: inset: 01651D90 idx: 0 par: 118 pos: 782
new: inset: 01651D90 idx: 0 par: 118 pos: 710
wrong pos 782, max is 710 at level 1. Trying to correct this.
old: inset:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:58:29 Philippe Charpentier wrote:
lyx2lyx converts those documents coming from 1.3.x or before. Isn't
that working?
When I open some old files I obtain the following error:
How old are those files? What is the file format number for those files?
--
José
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 14:07:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
This patch is very very safe and fixes a crash.
Abdel.
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:34:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:33:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding this subject I think that this course of action is sound so
I don't expect any major surprises. (Famous last words).
If something does
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 14:31:40 Philippe Charpentier wrote:
José Abilio à écrit:
lyx2lyx converts those documents coming from 1.3.x or before. Isn't
that working?
When I open some old files I obtain the following error:
How old are those files? What is the file format number for
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 14:55:09 José Matos wrote:
In this case it would be enough to study the header section (the part of
the file before the real text comes)...
OK. I found the real culprit, we don't have the definition of frenchb in
lyx2lyx_lang. Adding that and it works again. I have
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 17:16:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The text refers to LyX 1.4.4 in the beginning, should that be 1.4.5
instead?
/C
Yes. Feel free to fix issues like this. :-)
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44
http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 17:03:50 Bo Peng wrote:
Insert - File - Child Document - Include Type - Listing. You will
have to manually enter options like firstline in the option box.
I am not sure what we can do to make this easier to access... any idea?
Merge graphics, external, include and
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 17:26:47 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Anyway, Richard's patch could be committed as is, and the message thing can
still be changed if it turns out to be as annoying as Helge states.
Opinions?
If you think it is OK go ahead. :-)
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 09:16:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done. I hope you didn't mean that I should have sent a patch to this
lis first (I just did it). Here's the difference:
Small changes to documentation are OK. It does not hurt to give an warning in
advance but there is no need to wait
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 20:36:25 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Yes, this is r18988 striking again :(
I don't think that this is related to the platform but rather to the
compiler version. I think that gcc 3.x is missing some locale facets.
Jean-Pierre, does the attached patch solve the bug for
On Thursday 12 July 2007 09:03:41 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Does the following patch help?
If it works put it in as it is the right fix.
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 10:41:25 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
This one would also catch MSVC, which AFAIK has no problem with
the locale sorting.
OK. You can commit the change.
--
Enrico
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 10:52:11 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jose', can I apply?
Yes.
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 18:13:26 Michael Gerz wrote:
Hi,
once again, I would like to draw your attention to the attached patch.
It fixes a serious problem with change-tracked output (text inside
deleted insets appears as unchanged text).
Could someone please have a look at the code and do
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 17:51:44 Michael Gerz wrote:
IIRC only Alfredo's patch #3600
This fix was delayed for 1.5.1
and the Windows font patch are not committed.
Any news on this from Joost or Uwe?
Michael
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 11:30:29 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 17:51:44 Michael Gerz wrote:
and the Windows font patch are not committed.
Any news on this from Joost or Uwe?
Author: forenr
Date: Wed Jul 11 13:57:58 2007
New Revision: 19038
On Thursday 12 July 2007 11:54:39 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Sight. So which one should we take? I think either one is ok. Yours is
probably simpler. I'll let you and José decide.
If you agree on one of the versions you have my OK.
As you see I am learning. Now instead of throwing a coin I
On Thursday 12 July 2007 12:00:14 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
On a second thought, I think you should just commit yours. José?
Jürgen
As I said before if you agree on one version, as it seems to be case, you have
my OK.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 13:59:08 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Java?
JMarc
Python is more likely. ;-)
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 16:51:55 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
For 1.5.0, I propose the attached.
Jürgen
OK then. Enrico earlier agreed with this and then we will have more time to
fix this properly.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 13:54:17 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José, OK to go in?
Jürgen
Yes.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:24:13 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I guess there are a few things to tweak (so that lyx2lyx produces the
right format by default, for example?),
That is not needed anymore, lyx always tell tells lyx2lyx the version where
it wants to receive the files.
and I have
On Thursday 12 July 2007 17:26:54 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I have another option.
Tell us more. :-)
--
Enrico
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 12 July 2007 18:06:42 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The exception is thrown by the locale constructor, not when the
ordering is performed. So, we catch it there and then either
use the locale facilities or the normal ordering. See patch
in the other post.
I saw the patch and I agree
On Thursday 12 July 2007 18:30:16 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Finally, there's the issue of bug 3613. It is due to some format change
from long ago which never had an accompanying lyx2lyx made for it (I
have nothing to do with that... ;) ). If possible, we should fix this
(i.e., create a lyx2lyx fix)
On Friday 13 July 2007 13:41:20 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
The attached patch seems to fix that bug finally, as Koji Yokota confirmed.
Actually, I'm not sure defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) is really needed -- this
basically identifies GNU/kFreeBSD (that doesn't have __FreeBSD__ defined).
It
On Saturday 14 July 2007 07:07:43 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José, OK?
Jürgen
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 14 July 2007 12:57:24 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
+1.
Abdel.
+1
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 15 July 2007 10:47:46 Martin Vermeer wrote:
If the LaTeX output is different, I would say it is a format
change... the problem is then to produce a lyx2lyx entry
that would modify an old .lyx file upon conversion to the
new format so, that it nevertheless produces the old LaTeX
On Monday 16 July 2007 01:01:34 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyXers,
I think we should release LyX 1.5.0 this week, so if somebody can help with
the lyx2lyx stuff please do so. (José, perhaps you can find an hour.)
I have more time now. I have used more than one hour to look into the
lyx2lyx
On Monday 16 July 2007 18:46:55 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
OK, Jose shall I commit?
OK.
Please note that I have two other patches pending...
I know, I am a slow thinker. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Monday 16 July 2007 22:30:09 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
This is technically a format change, though I would again argue that we
should *not* create a lyx2lyx for it.
I agree that this is not necessary as there is currently no user base that
needs this.
That is not a valid argument, we only use
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 09:43:12 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
There's nothing much to think about IMO. The two patches are fixing
_real_ crashes:
Close to the final release any patch that is not a one line makes me
nervous, no matter if they fix crashes or not. :-)
* delete_hideSignal.patch:
On Monday 16 July 2007 20:17:44 Dov Feldstern wrote:
This is technically a format change, though I would again argue that we
should *not* create a lyx2lyx for it. However, if this is not
acceptable, a lyx2lyx patch should be relatively simple; and that only
underlines the need for applying
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 10:52:13 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
arabi was not supported up until recently (1.5 only) so there was no
users of it, only Mostafa recently for Farsi.
I know that. But we have already released pre-releases with the support on
it and we want our users to take the
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 11:28:26 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Quite frankly, I don't think there's anybody but Mostafa. Even though
there is other users the only difference with the patch is, AFAIU, that
the number in the output will be in the correct order. This was clearly
a bug in LyX latex
On Friday 13 July 2007 13:16:46 Anders Ekberg wrote:
I have tried to address Georg's and Juergen's comments.
To avoid data-loss, the function is only run if the encoding is auto
or default and there are no language changes (overly conservative,
but possible to work around, as commented in the
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 14:25:23 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
This oneliner fixes some ugly drawing artefacts with insets in the appendix
(probably introduced with revision 19039).
Attached also a testcase where you can see the artefacts.
OK to apply?
OK.
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 15 July 2007 18:02:46 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Files from pre-249 are wrong, but post-249 don't have the problem. So my
new stage (277) should only run on files which originated at pre-249...
Currently, since I'm running on everything, I'm trying to fix things
which aren't broken...
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 15:02:42 Mostafa Vahedi wrote:
The patch sent by Dov is OK. I am really sorry for being late in replying
to the emails. These days I have too many things TODO.
OK then.
Mostafa
--
José Abílio
This bug was reported in the users list.
The problem was with the translation of the following piece:
\begin_inset LatexCommand
\url{http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpc/mkt/guidelines.s
html}
\end_inset
lyx2lyx was expecting the whole command to be in the same line so it left that
html} alone in
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 06:43:17 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José?
OK.
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 10:13:58 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I got a much better solution attached.
This seems to work AFAICS.
Jose?
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 19:00:37 Bo Peng wrote:
Jose:
The test case of bug 3404 has multiple consecutive
\begin_deeper
\begin_deeper
\end_deeper
\end_deeper
and an \end_layout is inserted before each \begin_deeper. This leads
to excessive \end_layout.
I am *not* familiar with lyx
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 00:25:18 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Can this go in José?
Yes.
regards Uwe
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 07:22:17 Richard Heck wrote:
Presumably, if you load one of these, it'll load fine, but if you opened
one of the URL insets and did something to it, it'd be changed from
htmlurl to url behind your back. Again, maybe not a huge problem, since
that's what the lyx2lyx
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 01:21:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Also, this has only convinced me even more that it's wrong to apply a
lyx2lyx fix for this patch: this is a bug fix, there were previously
.lyx files which were ok, but which lyx was generating incorrect latex
for, and patch 1820 fixes
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 11:07:33 José Matos wrote:
I propose to ignore this for the moment. It is low hanging fruit so we
can take care of it at any time.
In case it matters this really means to move this fix to 1.6 since it
(possibly) involves a file format change.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 07:26:09 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I'm not opposed to that, but it's up to José.
Well, as the baby is supposed to land in your hand very soon now (how
many time I said this? ;-)) I think your opinion matters.
Jose?
I think that we should branch after releasing
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 11:28:19 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
What's the status of the lyx2lyx issues?
I think that are quite near to get to a good solution.
Since the code deals with retroversion I will place the code in svn and then
ask people to test it. This code had a lot of testing so
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 19:00:37 Bo Peng wrote:
I am *not* familiar with lyx 1.3.x format and I do not know if there
are valid cases where multiple \begin_deeper should yield multiple
\end_layout. If you know the answer, the attached patch fixes bug
3404.
Cheers,
Bo
Committed thanks. :-)
Hello,
I propose to warn users of 1.5.0 regarding the downgrade to 1.4 and 1.3
documents.
I intend to commit the following patch and I would appreciate
suggestion to
change the spelling, grammar and content of the note.
Regards,
--
José Abílio
Index: po/POTFILES.in
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 12:38:05 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
OK, but what about the docs? Should I remove the description of linuxdoc or
not?
Remove it.
regards Uwe
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 13:45:27 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The diff above doesn't show anything different AFAICT.
The text has ^M at the end of lines.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 17:42:40 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4026
Another oneliner (AltGr was not listed as modifier key).
Jürgen
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:02:06 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I think I fixed the problem I was having, this patch now works. Please
try applying it and then converting as many files as you have lying
around from older version with it, just to make sure it doesn't break
anything. Jose --- could you
501 - 600 of 5277 matches
Mail list logo
