On Sunday 15 July 2007 01:59:27 Dov Feldstern wrote:
BTW, a simple lyx2lyx question, which will make life much easier: how do
I get to see the debug printouts?
./lyx2lyx ... /dev/null
that is the general output is sent to /dev/null and you only care with the
warnings.
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:02:06 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I think I fixed the problem I was having, this patch now works. Please
try applying it and then converting as many files as you have lying
around from older version with it, just to make sure it doesn't break
anything. Jose --- could you
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 20:44:57 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Attached find a much simplified version of this patch, based on what you
suggested. I'm not sure if this is what you meant, but this time I just
edited the function used in format change 249 in place, so there's now
no need for a new
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 20:44:57 Dov Feldstern wrote:
OK?
Dov
PS: Just like in the other case please add a remark to release notes
explaining what had gone wrong in the convertion of documents pre-249 before
this patch.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 21:26:09 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I see that rsplit is new in 2.4... Are we officially requiring python2.4
for lyx2lyx, or is this just an oversight?
Oversight, we require python 2.3. I will fix this as well as the other cases.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 19 July 2007 01:02:25 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
There are now still 2 lyx2lyx blockers left:
- with the latest lyx2lyx changes lyx2lyx requires admin permissions on
Windows what makes it unusable for normal Windows users. The reason is the
line temp_file = os.tmpfile()
in lyx_1_5.py,
On Thursday 19 July 2007 09:22:47 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
OK to apply?
Georg pointed me towards some cut and paste errors in the patch. Corrected
patch attached.
OK.
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 19 July 2007 06:33:31 Angus Leeming wrote:
Attached is my take on it.
A.
Thanks Angus, I have included it in my changes.
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 19 July 2007 15:38:56 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
This patch from Georg fixes the reversion problems for me. There are still
some issues to resolve (see Georg's comment on bugzilla), but I think this
patch should be applied anyway.
José, shall I do that?
Please do.
I have also
On Thursday 19 July 2007 16:00:02 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José Matos wrote:
José, shall I do that?
Please do.
I have also other changes to get rid of rsplit but that applied after
this since it is not overlapping.
Done.
Jürgen
kmail has some unreported bugs because
On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:28:01 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
With this patch applied, I still get
Warning: An error ocurred in 248, function revert_accent at 0x1b3ab0
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /opt/src/lyx-1.5.0svn/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx, line 101, in ?
Hi all,
I have played a bit with the code in revert_unicode and it seems to
work to
me. I have committed it as the improved a lot the time execution.
Does this produces the right convertion?
Has this code problems with python 2.3? (I am using 2.5 but trying to
be
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 22:35:52 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Attached find a patch which includes:
- a placeholder format change for bug 1820
Either we change the file format now or we don't. I don't want to be in
a
gray area. Since we have decided not to convert old document do I think
On Friday 20 July 2007 07:33:20 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Which turned out to be another critical bug :-(
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4046
Here's the fix. José, this was introduced with your latest cleanup.
Jürgen
OK. I suspected about this fix but I
On Friday 20 July 2007 07:17:30 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
OK?
Jürgen
Sure.
--
José Abílio
On Friday 20 July 2007 09:42:40 Michael Gerz wrote:
Hmpf wasn't the removal of the const-ness the major reason why my
change tracking patch was rejected?
Michael
You are right. It seems that we need some kind of state machine to run across
latex/docbook generation. And the OutputParams
On Friday 20 July 2007 10:34:38 Michael Gerz wrote:
IMHO 14 parameters are enough. Don't you think that a container like
OutputParams is the better solution?
Michael
But not OutputParams. OutputParams are parameters used to control the output,
as I said before you want something like
On Friday 20 July 2007 13:37:36 Dov Feldstern wrote:
I hope to solve this problem eventually, see discussion at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/88939. But for now, I
think that adding this comment the the release notes should be enough.
Dov
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Friday 20 July 2007 12:46:47 Michael Gerz wrote:
Just to make sure: Is OutputState 1.5.X stuff or would you (and Jürgen)
be willing with a temporary fix like the one posted before and find an
elegant solution for 1.6.0?
Yes. This can go in 1.5.0 assuming the code has been tested (coming
On Thursday 19 July 2007 19:10:26 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Yes, that's it. What about the attached patch?
--
Enrico
I am not sure that affects all systems but technically you are correct, this
was fixed just for 2.3.4, right?
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Friday 20 July 2007 14:27:56 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
- the above and some lyx2lyx issues that might be considered: 4048, 4050
(oneliner from Anders available), 3313 (ordered in decreasing severity,
IMHO). Plus eventually Michael's patch.
Concerning the lyx2lyx issues, I'd say since you
On Saturday 21 July 2007 06:27:44 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
This oneline fixes it. OK to commit?
Jürgen
OK. Both for patch and for documentation.
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 21 July 2007 07:37:13 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I don't have time, sorry.
However, I think we could also postpone this to 1.5.1.
Jürgen
For 1.5.1 it is. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Friday 20 July 2007 20:27:51 Bo Peng wrote:
Lyx 1.5.0 has a new feature that you can open a lyx file with local
.layout and .cls files. That is to say, if someone sends you a zip
file with a lyx file and some foreign .cls and .layout files you can
simply unpack and open the .lyx file.
On Saturday 21 July 2007 13:47:49 Martin Vermeer wrote:
Looking forward to seeing you all!
:-)
(btw what was the sequence number of this meeting?)
Pick a number and no one will doubt it. ;-)
- Martin
--
José Abílio
On Monday 23 July 2007 16:27:24 Bo Peng wrote:
What else is holding 1.5.0 back?
Bo
lyx2lyx convertion to older formats (and you know what I think about it).
--
José Abílio
On Monday 23 July 2007 13:58:45 Bo Peng wrote:
I can not test all, but it works under windows and linux (tetex and
miktex). The only problem I am aware of is that when child documents
resides in a different directory from the main document, the cls and
layout files have to be copied to all the
On Monday 23 July 2007 17:28:56 Bo Peng wrote:
I thought these have been solved... ok. I can wait.
And they had, but we found new corner cases and those are the ones we have
been closing. :-)
Bo
--
José Abílio
On Monday 23 July 2007 18:37:41 Bo Peng wrote:
How about:
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 15:50:50 Bo Peng wrote:
Jose, OK?
OK.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 09:21:39 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4055
The attached patch (4055.diff) fixes one part of this crash. However, LyX
still asserts when rtl support is checked in Preferences-Languages (i.e.
in the default settings). I suspect the
Hi,
what needs to be done to expand the support of other versions of
automake
other than 1.9.
In lyx 1.5 we support automake from 1.5 to 1.10...
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 16:32:51 Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi,
what needs to be done to expand the support of other versions of
automake other than 1.9.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17178
I arrived to the same conclusion. :-) Thank you. :-)
We can not support previous versions because
Hi,
as it has become a tradition with releases I have placed the packages
for
1.4.5 in http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.4
As usual if no problems serious problems show up I will upload this
file to
its final location soon.
FWIW the patch to svn related to the version
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 21:52:38 Joost Verburg wrote:
Is this patch OK to apply?
OK.
Regards,
Joost
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 21:43:38 Pavel Sanda wrote:
OK, I added a FIXME and committed.
I would like to see 1.5.0 out as soon as possible. :-)
sorry to be tiresome :), but i think that also this
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2738#c18
may be good to resolve before 1.5.0 release
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 22:24:10 Pavel Sanda wrote:
Do you have a patch? :-)
already in list :)
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg123126.html
pavel
Could you update it, please?
$ patch --dry-run -p0 /home/jamatos/tmp/revert-locale.patch
patching file
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 23:33:09 Pavel Sanda wrote:
Could you update it, please?
hmm, are we talking about the same patch ?
$ cat /trash/revert.patch |patch -p0 --dry-run
patching file frontend_helpers.cpp
$
pavel
Since the other patch was inline... OK, this applies cleanly and I will
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 06:41:38 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
You have to set
OptionalArgs1
in the style definitions (in the layout file), then you can use
Insert-Short Title.
Jürgen
FWIW I did it in my personal copy and it works. :-)
We should do this for 1.5.1, this is not a file
Hi all,
I have released lyx-1.4.5 and 1.5.0. The packages are available from
ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable
I have not yet succeeded in copying them to ftp.lyx.org, that is why
there is
no public announce.
I will update this status during the day. I would like also
On Sunday 15 July 2007 22:06:10 Paul A. Rubin wrote:
If some kind developer would test these and then commit them if
appropriate, I would be obliged. If you'd prefer diff files, that could
probably be arranged. Sorry for the web links, but I tried posting this
through GMANE with zip
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 16:13:03 Bo Peng wrote:
For 1.5.x, you'll need my OK.
For 1.6.x, the usual review process applies.
Bo
I would like to see some kind of plan, nothing too formal but at the same time
a general idea where the current development stage is leading us.
I would like
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 22:11:26 Bo Peng wrote:
A zip file allows much more complicated structure and easier
manipulation than the 'inline' embedding. Actually, earlier versions
of word documents used it, but all later versions of word and
ooffice/odf, use a zip/directory/file-filesystem
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 20:01:28 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:08:01PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jamatos
Date: Wed Jul 25 15:07:59 2007
New Revision: 19205
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19205
Log:
LyX 1.5.0 is released
Modified:
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 23:40:49 Joost Verburg wrote:
scons should also be updated.
OK, then please update scons, and only scons. I really want to close 1.4.x
forever. :-)
Joost
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 23:40:49 Joost Verburg wrote:
scons should also be updated.
Joost
OK Joost, second retry. The packages have been updated.They retain the same
name but they have been updated. Please test. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 20:39:46 Joost Verburg wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Hi all,
I have released lyx-1.4.5 and 1.5.0. The packages are available from
ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable
I cannot get lyx2lyx to work in 1.4.5. First of all it complains about a
missing unicodesymbols
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 23:46:30 Joost Verburg wrote:
Please do not commit any more code to 1.4.x branch.
I updated scons in the 1.4 branch to include unicodesymbols. This should
go in 1.4.5.1.
OK.
Joost
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 26 July 2007 09:41:29 Michael Gerz wrote:
Someone with write permissions should announce LyX 1.4.5.1 and 1.5.0 on
the LyX website.
Michael
Don't you have access?
I am sorry, I have to leave now. The packages are already in the stable
section of ftp.devel.lyx.org
The other steps
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 23:25:26 Bo Peng wrote:
What are you going to do? Will there be a 1.4.6 now or shall I release
1.4.5 for Windows with unicodesymbols included?
Tag 1.4.5-1?
Close 1.4.5.1. :-)
Please do not commit any more code to 1.4.x branch.
Bo
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 23:06:55 Bo Peng wrote:
As title.
Yes. The new stable series is 1.5.x.
Bo
--
José Abílio
Hi,
in order to save me from the shame of wearing a second brown paper bag
could
you please test the packages placed in http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.4/
The only change in this file related to the initial 1.4.5 is the
inclusion of
the missing files (and twists in the
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 20:14:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/development/scons/SConstruct
URL:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_4_X/development/sc
ons/SConstruct?rev=19214
Hi all,
I am in the evening before leaving to the Jamboree (where I will be
without
any net access for two weeks) and so I decided to clean all items in my TODO
list. Here it comes another:
I thought about two messages to send to the list after releasing 1.5.0. The
first was to ask to
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 16:21:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From me too!
I hate to say me too but in this case it is impossible to avoid. :-)
/C
PS: I have been absent from discussion because in Bromarv port 25 was blocked
and answering over the webmail interface is tedious and sloppy.
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 16:59:12 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Of course, once one think about that it soon goes to what we need is
a layout manager!, which sounds like a haunting task. However, it
would make sense to rip parts of the tabular or matharray code to
obtain this feature as an
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 19:49:01 Martin Vermeer wrote:
Does anybody else spot a problem with this? I'll wait for
the Bromarv Cowboys to appear on the list again before
committing.
What needs to be done?
- Martin
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 16 August 2007 14:49:57 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The real problem you mentioned may be that insets do not provide as
many display schemes as needed. New schemes would be useful for
other purposes as well, e.g. for charstyles; however that's not a
reason for putting
On Thursday 16 August 2007 21:18:39 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
None of this is horrible to fix, but I think we miss a lot of polish.
OK. :-)
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Friday 17 August 2007 17:49:18 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Some of use are at work you know... ;-)
I know and my real work has suffered from this patch simplification
which I still think was worth nothing.
The purpose of longer delays applies only to large patches, not to small
ones.
On Thursday 09 August 2007 14:00:04 Georg Baum wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: baum
Date: Thu Aug 9 14:47:06 2007
New Revision: 19373
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19373
Log:
parse some more column types and separators
Modified:
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 09:11:33 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
As there's apparently nobody, I took the liberty to commit it.
Jürgen delegated the task in me and Jean-Marc. :-)
I agree with you that the patch should be committed and in that case please
do not forget to update status.15x
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 20:18:49 Bo Peng wrote:
If no one can fix autotools in a day, autotools can be dumped because
too few people can or are willing to maintain it.
The same can be said about any other buildsystem. We are on holidays time
(at least in the Northern hemisphere) so a day
On Monday 20 August 2007 17:09:33 Martin Vermeer wrote:
Yes... this requires the patch to layout2layout in order to work.
Haven't committed yet, waiting for José's comments.
José?
Go on. :-)
- Martin
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 20:54:17 Martin Vermeer wrote:
Attached.
- Martin
If this work happily then congratulations for you work Martin. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Monday 20 August 2007 16:49:20 Bo Peng wrote:
Dear list,
Because I get no objection to the design of the embedding feature of
lyx, I plan to add it to the trunk in the next few weeks. There is,
however, a big question on how to zip and unzip files.
There is a unzipFile function in
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 21:35:46 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The Qt3 frontend is still available from svn. If there had been a real
interest in further development it would have happened.
At the time there was interest, but it was nevertheless removed.
Enrico, in the interest of
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 23:22:49 Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Good work :-)
+1 :-)
A/
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 10:31:47 Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Hello,
While creating a lyx template for ifac conferences, I had this behaviour:
- build the layout and template for 1.4.5
- upgrade the layout for 1.5, read the template and save with 1.5.1
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 16:02:45 Bo Peng wrote:
[What I write in this message is exclusively related with scons, I am trying
to be the devil's advocate over this case. I don't forget as well that I am
one of the earliest to propose the use of python into lyx.]
scons can build the official
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 16:04:08 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I guess I am talking about this bug:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3171
This bug is irrelevant now that we have one BufferView per Buffer ;-)
If that is the case then please mark the bug as fixedintrunk. :-)
Abdel.
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 15:13:27 Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
But Stable/DocIterators are not edit-persistent (you need some kind of
registering with the buffer to adjust on user edition). Do you have some
ideas?
We have used before the idea of using libuuid (universally unique
identifier)
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 13:40:09 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jose, do you want me to proceed?
Yes. Please coordinate with Bo since this is his code.
Abdel.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 18:38:01 Martin Vermeer wrote:
We're getting closer and closer to really useful customizable insets ;-)
Goes in if nobody sees a problem.
OK.
- Martin
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 18:03:14 Edwin Leuven wrote:
i thought you knew by now that andré is a humorist too, so you shouldn't
take everything he says so seriously...
You are right in a sense. The problem is always how to decide when to taken
him seriously, and believe me that in that case
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 19:00:20 Bo Peng wrote:
OTHO the development of scons was stalled for a long time. I had not
used it for more than one year after the introduction in lyx because it
required the use of an unreleased version.
As I have said, scons' development is much better
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 18:52:25 Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Care to explain?
Actually I don't remember much and google is not friend. :-)
If every paragraph (and insets fwiw) had an universal unique ID the
bookmarks would be a lot more stable, no?
A/
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 19:39:40 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
- i = i + 1
+ i += 1
Please don't use such constructs. This makes life hard for newbies and
those who just want to have a look how a function works.
You are joking, right? :-)
The only reason the previous code was there was to
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 19:19:45 Bo Peng wrote:
I do not think autotools provide more than scons if we weight
everything. An obvious example is windows support. We have other build
system exactly because autotools' problems.
We don't want to change from an incomplete method (but known)
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 20:38:24 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
When you think this is not clear enough, I would like to use simply:
inc(i)
With all the due respect for you Uwe it seems to me that you are doing a
tempest in a teapot. :-)
If the language we are using is python we should use the
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 21:38:05 Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 07:12:15PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
And you know that I would drop m4 for python in an eye blink. ;-)
You are too predictable.
With respect to m4? Surely. ;-)
Andre'
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 22:39:50 Martin Vermeer wrote:
Are you sure? Less than half of them so far.
(But I'll try to work on it)
Uwe is right. We have defined half as the threshold for the language to be
shown, and Finish is not different from other languages in that regard. :-)
-
On Saturday 18 August 2007 23:52:00 Andre Poenitz wrote:
Typical use would be to have such --enable-monolithic-* for
{core,mathed,insets,controllers,frontends,qt4,tex2lyx,client,boost}
implemented and 'switched on' for all the areas one is not currently
working on (or invert that logic at some
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 21:07:41 Bo Peng wrote:
Could you add, please, your ideas to a wiki page under development?
Will do that later.
Even a compilation of previous messages to this list is OK. :-)
Here is a comment from my src/EmbeddedFiles.h:
This has now become:
On Thursday 23 August 2007 15:07:47 Bo Peng wrote:
Thanks. Maybe we should have a 'New in 1.6.0' or 'PEP for 1.6.0' page.
For the moment I have created a category called LyX_1_6 that has two pages:
embedding and xml.
See http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Devel
As soon as new pages are created
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 23:53:54 Andre Poenitz wrote:
I jsut tried to create a wiki page to collect all the stuff that's
written here.
It's currently
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Pages
and I have no clue how I can rename this 'Pages' into somethoing like
'Build Systems'. Christian?
On Thursday 26 July 2007 15:36:32 Lyx user wrote:
Now that Unicode is supported and everyone is looking towards version 1.6,
I would like to suggest full support for XeTeX. It is currently the most
comprehensive way to put Unicode characters in a TeX document. Another
great feature is direct
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 11:05:11 Darren Freeman wrote:
If nobody else puts their hand up, I might work on this some day, but
currently I have other obligations :) I have a background in image
processing and I would certainly offer advice to whoever works on it.
It seems Darren that you
On Thursday 23 August 2007 20:13:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umm... shouldn't it go into bugzilla?
Yes. :-)
If we want to show them on a wiki
page, we could tag them in someway (or a special search), and have that
embedded in a wiki page?
And so I did. Have you seen
On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:49:07 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Hmm, on second
thought, it is better requiring Qt 4.3.1 which has already been released.
--
Enrico
Why, is that a problem? ;-)
$ rpm -qi qt4
Name: qt4 Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version :
On Thursday 23 August 2007 19:30:19 Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:11:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
That alternative would of course not have guaranteed that 1.5.0 would be
released with qt3. Maybe it would indeed have been too much work to keep
it up to date, and it would
On Thursday 23 August 2007 20:54:57 Bo Peng wrote:
Note that in a few weeks, scons should be able to do 'scons rpm',
'scons sdist' etc, using a snapshot version of scons (Jose will hate
this. :-).
Let us pretend that I did not hear this. ;-)
Bo
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 23 August 2007 21:31:25 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On third thought, maybe we should only allow Qt snaspshots,
just to be sure. Don't we already use boost snapshots?
Now that you mention it the solution is to carry our own copy of qt, then qt
and boost will be on the same level...
On Friday 24 August 2007 08:22:38 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Fixed. We could also offer the user a choice to revert to existing
display or to create a new display for the same document.
Opinions?
When in doubt do what emacs does: create a new display for the same
document.
Abdel.
--
José
On Friday 24 August 2007 12:57:23 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jose, do you want it for 1.5?
With Jürgen coming soon I will let this decision to him. :-)
So apart from style issues (that are easily fixed) this patch can go in
devel. :-)
Abdel.
--
José Abílio
On Friday 24 August 2007 18:02:59 Richard Heck wrote:
I can do the other two if they are wanted.
Go on. :-)
Richard
--
José Abílio
On Friday 24 August 2007 18:22:39 Richard Heck wrote:
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules
development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
I have added this to http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LayoutModularity
--
José Abílio
On Friday 24 August 2007 13:14:33 Alexandre Santos wrote:
However I have a problem importing the .tex files produced by txt2tags
into LyX. The title and author field are missing in the .lyx file,
replaced by a clear page mention. The final .dvi lacks those fields
entirely.
Without looking
On Friday 24 August 2007 20:12:07 Bo Peng wrote:
I guess you know what I meant. :-)
And here is another one with some minor adjustments.
I will only look into this next Monday. :-(
This should not dissuade other people from commenting the patch.
Expect other bombastic revelations as I
On Monday 27 August 2007 08:43:45 Alexandre Santos wrote:
Yep, if I launch latex xp1.tex (or xp2.tex), I get properly formatted
dvi files (using MikeTex and Yap). So the problem seems to be with
LyX).
AFAIKS an easy solution is to move the the title and author after the
\begin{document} in
601 - 700 of 5283 matches
Mail list logo
