Re: [patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-03-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: I've discovered problems with bibtex parsing at LyX startup if the abstract field contains unicode characters: the failure is soft (I see a message on stderr) and the document is loaded but most of the entries in the bibtex database associated with the document are

Re: [patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-03-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: > I've discovered problems with bibtex parsing at LyX startup if the > abstract field contains unicode characters: the failure is soft (I see a > message on stderr) and the document is loaded but most of the entries in > the bibtex database associated with the document

Re: [patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-03-01 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
I've discovered problems with bibtex parsing at LyX startup if the abstract field contains unicode characters: the failure is soft (I see a message on stderr) and the document is loaded but most of the entries in the bibtex database associated with the document are not available during

Re: [patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-03-01 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
I've discovered problems with bibtex parsing at LyX startup if the abstract field contains unicode characters: the failure is soft (I see a message on stderr) and the document is loaded but most of the entries in the bibtex database associated with the document are not available during

Re: [patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-02-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Guenter Milde wrote: should be adressed in a generic way as well (not only iconv but any helper application) (as this can happen also with unknown glyphs). You get a warning now with unknown glyphs in bibitems (as you get in most other contexts) Jürgen

Re: [patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-02-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Guenter Milde wrote: > should be adressed in a generic way as well (not only iconv but any helper > application) (as this can happen also with unknown glyphs). You get a warning now with unknown glyphs in bibitems (as you get in most other contexts) Jürgen

[patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-02-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6534 This post on lyx-docs http://marc.info/?l=lyx-docsm=126595372224033w=2 pointed me towards various unicode problems in the bibitem inset. Two issues: 1. if the label of a bibitem has a unicode glyph that is unknown to the output encoding, this has to be

Re: [patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-02-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-02-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Currently, a unicode glyph (outside the output file's encoding) either in the label or in the key yields a silent iconv error ... The attached patch against branch solves both issues. Objections, comments? Thanks. However, the silence of the iconv

[patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-02-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6534 This post on lyx-docs http://marc.info/?l=lyx-docs=126595372224033=2 pointed me towards various unicode problems in the bibitem inset. Two issues: 1. if the label of a bibitem has a unicode glyph that is unknown to the output encoding, this has to be

Re: [patch] 6534: fix unicode issues in bibitem

2010-02-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-02-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Currently, a unicode glyph (outside the output file's encoding) either > in the label or in the key yields a silent iconv error ... > The attached patch against branch solves both issues. > Objections, comments? Thanks. However, the "silence" of the