Re: alpha beta lyx-formats and devel versions of the docs

2017-08-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 07:55:55PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > My personal policy is to stop working on the stable branch docs with the > release of the first beta of a new version. This is just to save manpower. > We have not released a beta yet, but I already started the doc updating for > 2.3.

Re: alpha beta lyx-formats and devel versions of the docs

2017-07-30 Thread Uwe Stöhr
El 26.07.2017 a las 21:41, Richard Heck escribió: Mike makes a good point. He wants to help with testing and improving the documentation but cannot because of the file format. What is our policy on updating the file format? I believe we only do that when we have to update the format because we

Re: alpha beta lyx-formats and devel versions of the docs

2017-07-26 Thread Richard Heck
On 07/26/2017 02:18 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 08:29:50PM +0200, mn wrote: >> The latest publicly available binaries are for alpha1-1. >> The latest changes to the docs are format 544, and none of the versions >> I have installed can read or convert them. >> >> Now, say I

Re: alpha beta lyx-formats and devel versions of the docs

2017-07-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 08:29:50PM +0200, mn wrote: > The latest publicly available binaries are for alpha1-1. > The latest changes to the docs are format 544, and none of the versions > I have installed can read or convert them. > > Now, say I have spotted errors or improvements in or for them,

alpha beta lyx-formats and devel versions of the docs

2017-07-25 Thread mn
The latest publicly available binaries are for alpha1-1. The latest changes to the docs are format 544, and none of the versions I have installed can read or convert them. Now, say I have spotted errors or improvements in or for them, like latest UserGuide.de.lyx: 26812selbst) Formate für