Re: [LyX/master] ctests: update inversion patterns.

Am Dienstag, den 21.02.2017, 10:35 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > If you think your patch is a step forward, and these tests were just > passing by chance before, then in my opinion the correct way to > proceed > is to apply your patch and invert these two tests. OK. Note that the two tests

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: update inversion patterns.

Am Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2017 um 09:37:54, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Am Dienstag, den 21.02.2017, 10:35 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > If you think your patch is a step forward, and these tests were just > > passing by chance before, then in my opinion the correct way to >

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: update inversion patterns.

Am Mittwoch, den 22.02.2017, 10:18 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Now I am confused. What is your proposal? > a.) Add these tests to the chain of "missing glyph" This. > or > b.) Add code to the preamble of the two files > ? This was just an explanation of the problem (as far as I

Re: lyx errors with lualatex and non-tex fonts

Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2017, 15:05 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > I think the reason is that LaTeX actually switched to TU font > encoding Tonight's update of latex-base brings back \textquotebdl and \textquotesingle to TU encodings. I will handle that in a few days (when the update has

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: update inversion patterns.

Am Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2017 um 10:56:53, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Am Mittwoch, den 22.02.2017, 10:18 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Now I am confused. What is your proposal? > > a.) Add these tests to the chain of "missing glyph" > > This. Good. Will do it. Please

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: update inversion patterns.

Am Mittwoch, den 22.02.2017, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Good. Will do it. Please don't forget to apply your patch for > src/BufferParams.cpp. Done now. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [LyX/master] Generalise the deletion protection mechanism from math to text (#9540)

Le 18/02/2017 à 23:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : commit 71623b88b2c613dd4ab826a9783a53e840bcd6e1 Author: Guillaume Munch Date: Sat Feb 18 19:12:55 2017 +0100 Generalise the deletion protection mechanism from math to text (#9540) Now backspace and delete in text will

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: update inversion patterns.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:22:11AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2017 um 10:56:53, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > > > Am Mittwoch, den 22.02.2017, 10:18 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Now I am confused. What is your proposal? > > > a.) Add these tests to

Re: Ticket #10062: Restore default UI colors

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:46:16AM +0200, racoon wrote: > Just wanted to bring your attention to a patch I posted some time ago in > case it was overlooked. > > https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10062 Thanks for bumping. I tested and I have some comments I'll put on the ticket. Scott

Re: [LyX/master] Theorem style: set NextNoIndent to 0

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:03:36PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 02/22/2017 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > commit f9ee47dfa2706bed34431177723dfdc5c2d2a7db > > Author: Scott Kostyshak > > Date: Fri Nov 11 11:55:31 2016 -0500 > > > > Theorem style: set NextNoIndent

Re: [LyX/master] Theorem style: set NextNoIndent to 0

On 02/22/2017 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > commit f9ee47dfa2706bed34431177723dfdc5c2d2a7db > Author: Scott Kostyshak > Date: Fri Nov 11 11:55:31 2016 -0500 > > Theorem style: set NextNoIndent to 0 > > After a Theorem environment, LaTeX does by default indent

Re: simple frame + verbatim fails

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:43:07AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 03:07:37AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > In the example file attached, I get the following error: > > > > ! Argument of \@xverbatim has an extra }. > > > > every box option except "simple frame"

Re: lyx errors with lualatex and non-tex fonts

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:16:52AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:34:38PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > > > 2196 - export/doc/es/UserGuide_dvi3_systemF (Failed) > > > 2203 - export/doc/es/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF (Failed) > > > > These two have the known problem

Re: Memory leak in master?

Le 21/02/2017 à 20:13, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Thanks for doing this. I thought there was some bigger adaptation to the code to do but indeed it only looks like a matter of C++98 conversion. You mean it was a trap? It did not work %-p I think it's all good except: class Cache : private

Re: [patch] Theorem environment: set NextNoIndent to 0

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 06:40:32PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Attached are two patches. Pushed at 2b1a99e5 and f9ee47df. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature