Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-17 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:48:41AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the > output of en- and em-dashes. In 2.2 en- and em-dashes are output as > the \textendash and \textemdash macros, causing changed output in > old documents and

Re: [PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

2017-03-17 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-03-07, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the > output of en- and em-dashes. In 2.2 en- and em-dashes are output as > the \textendash and \textemdash macros, causing changed output in > old

Is this a valid .lyx file (created by 2.0.8.1)?

2017-03-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Attached is a minimal example from here: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/358326/my-font-shows-up-in-the-font-list-but-the-document-wont-compile It was created with 2.0.8.1. When I open it in 2.1.0 or 2.2.x I get: Warning: Malformed LyX document: Can't find \use_mathdots. Warning:

Fwd: adding costum spellchecker to lyx

2017-03-17 Thread kobi kolodner
Hi I am writing a spellchecker based on google suggestions in python. how can I add it to lyx so it will appear as an option in Tools/Preferences/Language Settings/Spellchecker/Spellchecker engine I am very much a novice in writing code so any help\suggestion even if it seems obvious will be

Re: Is this a valid .lyx file (created by 2.0.8.1)?

2017-03-17 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:06:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Attached is a minimal example from here: > > http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/358326/my-font-shows-up-in-the-font-list-but-the-document-wont-compile > > It was created with 2.0.8.1. > > When I open it in 2.1.0 or 2.2.x I

Re: simple frame + verbatim fails

2017-03-17 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 22.02.2017 um 18:14 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: every box option except "simple frame" works. Is this expected? I did find a LaTeX-workaround here: http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-verbwithin.html Attached is a file using \cprotect that does work. Are there consequences to this workaround? I'm

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

2017-03-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:53:30PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Saturday, 11 March 2017 20.48.02 WET Richard Heck wrote: > > And I'll second that. You did an excellent job last time, which is why > > we all want you to do it again. > > +1 Thanks for all of your encouragement. I will

Re: Crash in File-Open

2017-03-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 22:29:58, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 14:47:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:09:16PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:19:48PM +0100, Kornel Benko

Re: Crash in File-Open

2017-03-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:47:31PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 22:29:58, schrieb Kornel Benko > > Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 14:47:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:09:16PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak

Re: Fwd: adding costum spellchecker to lyx

2017-03-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:31:45PM +0200, kobi kolodner wrote: > Hi > > I am writing a spellchecker based on google suggestions in python. > how can I add it to lyx so it will appear as an option in > Tools/Preferences/Language Settings/Spellchecker/Spellchecker engine > > I am very much a

Re: Is this a valid .lyx file (created by 2.0.8.1)?

2017-03-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:46:43PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:06:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Attached is a minimal example from here: > > > >

Re: simple frame + verbatim fails

2017-03-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:43:27PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 22.02.2017 um 18:14 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > > every box option except "simple frame" works. Is this expected? > > > > > > > > I did find a LaTeX-workaround here: > > > > http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-verbwithin.html > > > > > >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #107

2017-03-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 15/03/2017 à 12:12, Kornel Benko a écrit : Probably some automake failure. Using old ./src/support/tests/dummy_functions.o in the build dir. Removing that file, it will be rebuild with make check-recursive and './src/check_layout' is linked. Don't understand, why in this case