On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:48:41AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the
> output of en- and em-dashes. In 2.2 en- and em-dashes are output as
> the \textendash and \textemdash macros, causing changed output in
> old documents and
On 2017-03-07, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --]
> The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the
> output of en- and em-dashes. In 2.2 en- and em-dashes are output as
> the \textendash and \textemdash macros, causing changed output in
> old
Attached is a minimal example from here:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/358326/my-font-shows-up-in-the-font-list-but-the-document-wont-compile
It was created with 2.0.8.1.
When I open it in 2.1.0 or 2.2.x I get:
Warning: Malformed LyX document: Can't find \use_mathdots.
Warning:
Hi
I am writing a spellchecker based on google suggestions in python.
how can I add it to lyx so it will appear as an option in
Tools/Preferences/Language Settings/Spellchecker/Spellchecker engine
I am very much a novice in writing code so any help\suggestion even if it
seems obvious will be
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:06:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Attached is a minimal example from here:
>
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/358326/my-font-shows-up-in-the-font-list-but-the-document-wont-compile
>
> It was created with 2.0.8.1.
>
> When I open it in 2.1.0 or 2.2.x I
Am 22.02.2017 um 18:14 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
every box option except "simple frame" works. Is this expected?
I did find a LaTeX-workaround here:
http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-verbwithin.html
Attached is a file using \cprotect that does work. Are there
consequences to this workaround?
I'm
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:53:30PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 March 2017 20.48.02 WET Richard Heck wrote:
> > And I'll second that. You did an excellent job last time, which is why
> > we all want you to do it again.
>
> +1
Thanks for all of your encouragement. I will
Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 22:29:58, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 14:47:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:09:16PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:19:48PM +0100, Kornel Benko
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:47:31PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 22:29:58, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > Am Samstag, 11. März 2017 um 14:47:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:09:16PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:31:45PM +0200, kobi kolodner wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am writing a spellchecker based on google suggestions in python.
> how can I add it to lyx so it will appear as an option in
> Tools/Preferences/Language Settings/Spellchecker/Spellchecker engine
>
> I am very much a
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:46:43PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:06:07PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Attached is a minimal example from here:
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:43:27PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 22.02.2017 um 18:14 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > > > every box option except "simple frame" works. Is this expected?
> > > >
> > > > I did find a LaTeX-workaround here:
> > > > http://www.tex.ac.uk/FAQ-verbwithin.html
> > > >
> >
Le 15/03/2017 à 12:12, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Probably some automake failure. Using old ./src/support/tests/dummy_functions.o
in the build dir.
Removing that file, it will be rebuild with
make check-recursive
and './src/check_layout' is linked.
Don't understand, why in this case
13 matches
Mail list logo