Do you have in mind Liviu's repo? What else is there that we in any way
control?
On Nov 1, 2017 3:14 PM, "Pavel Sanda" wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We've built and checked the binaries. Everything looks good for rc1. I
> > will upload to the ftp in a
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We've built and checked the binaries. Everything looks good for rc1. I
> will upload to the ftp in a couple of hours, wait for the mirrors to
> pick everything up, and unless we discover a major issue, we should be
> able to announce the release tomorrow
Dear all,
We've built and checked the binaries. Everything looks good for rc1. I
will upload to the ftp in a couple of hours, wait for the mirrors to
pick everything up, and unless we discover a major issue, we should be
able to announce the release tomorrow night (after the mirrors have had
El 01.11.2017 a las 19:20, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
Go ahead to 2.3.x branch. Although we have not officially released RC1,
we have referred to the installers publicly and I have pushed the commit
and tag, so there's no going backward now. If any blocker is found, we
would have to move to RC2.
Le 31 octobre 2017 13:36:47 GMT+01:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
a écrit :
>Yes 2 is good for fixing the symptom, but it is very fragile...
We could also try
4. Note when we have requested a repaint and exit early from paintEvent() when
we did not ask for this repaint. (Or even
Am Mittwoch, den 01.11.2017, 12:04 +0100 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> commit b851a349b6f303824f329a5dc854827f66828764
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Wed Nov 1 12:03:54 2017 +0100
>
> Enable OK/Apply buttons when resetting to class defaults.
> ---
>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 07:13:45PM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We've built and checked the binaries. Everything looks good for rc1. I
> > will upload to the ftp in a couple of hours, wait for the mirrors to
> > pick everything up, and unless we
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 11:34:23PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 01.11.2017 a las 19:20, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
>
> > Go ahead to 2.3.x branch. Although we have not officially released RC1,
> > we have referred to the installers publicly and I have pushed the commit
> > and tag, so there's no
Dear All,
thank you so much for all replies. Do I understand correct that I might be able to continue to work when I remove the koren parts (CJK envionment) form my text? At the moment I can not procuce any output. Lyx crashes.
Best Martin
--
Dr. Martin Rötting
OCCURSO Institut für
Tars for 2.3.0rc1 are up:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/lyx-2.3.0rc1/
Please download the tars and test compilation, installation, and basic
functionality. Let us know how it goes.
If all goes well and there are no major problems, I'll plan to announce
rc1 in a few days.
Thanks,
El 01.11.2017 a las 04:20, Richard Heck escribió:
This is a question you could ask of the people at your distro. They made
a decision to compile the kernel so that iwlwifi was integrated into it
and not a module.
Hi Richard,
many thanks for your detailed reply. I learned a lot.
So I need a
El 29.10.2017 a las 18:23, edu Gpl escribió:
Thank you. I reinstalled lyx 2.3 beta1. All ok.
Hi Hatim,
could you please do me the favor and
1. uninstall LyX 2.3beta1 completely (also the user settings!)
2. install LyX 2.3RC1:
Before the crash I do nothing spexial, just push the button on ly to lyxtopdf or latextopdf. She screenshoot was saken after I pushed "test tex" in the tools menue. My lyx file is attached. All worked fine before yesterday anf it jist added a word or corrected a typo.
Best Martin
--
Diese
On 11/01/2017 07:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.11.2017, 12:04 +0100 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
>> commit b851a349b6f303824f329a5dc854827f66828764
>> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
>> Date: Wed Nov 1 12:03:54 2017 +0100
>>
>> Enable OK/Apply buttons
Am Mittwoch, den 01.11.2017, 11:43 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck:
> +1, as it is simple enough, but I guess we have to wait until 2.3.x
> is
> open again,
> after the release of RC1.
Yes.
> It's fine for 2.2.x, too. Seems totally safe.
Backported to 2.2.x.
Jürgen
>
> Richard
>
signature.asc
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 05:08:33PM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.11.2017, 11:43 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck:
> > +1, as it is simple enough, but I guess we have to wait until 2.3.x
> > is
> > open again,
> > after the release of RC1.
>
> Yes.
Go ahead to 2.3.x branch.
16 matches
Mail list logo