Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: Jose' Matos wrote: FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): FYI, bugzilla'd so I/we can track it: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 -- Rex

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: Jose' Matos wrote: FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): FYI, bugzilla'd so I/we can track it: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 -- Rex

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Jose' Matos wrote: | |FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... | | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): To me this looks like a problem with gcc or boost (I see the same problem) and this issue

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 09:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Jose' Matos wrote: |FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... | | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): To me this looks like a

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Rex Dieter
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Jose' Matos wrote: | |FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... | | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): To me this looks like a problem with gcc or boost (I see the

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wednesday 01 February 2006 09:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Jose' Matos wrote: | |FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... | | | | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Jose' Matos wrote: | | |FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be | 1.4.0pre4... | | | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): | To me this

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jose' Matos wrote: | | > FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... | | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): To me this looks like a problem with gcc or boost (I see the same problem) and this issue

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 09:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Jose' Matos wrote: > | > FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... > | > | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): > > To me this looks

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Rex Dieter
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jose' Matos wrote: | | > FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... | | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): To me this looks like a problem with gcc or boost (I see

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wednesday 01 February 2006 09:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Jose' Matos wrote: | > | > FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... | > | | > | Another failure, now with pre4

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-02-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Jose' Matos wrote: | > | | > FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be | > 1.4.0pre4... | > | | Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): | >

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-01-31 Thread Rex Dieter
Jose' Matos wrote: FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./.. -I../../boost -O2 -g -pipe -Wall

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-01-31 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 13:48, Rex Dieter wrote: Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): I will let Lars get the credits for the fix. ;-) -- José Abílio

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-01-31 Thread Rex Dieter
Jose' Matos wrote: FWIW this is already fixed in latest CVS and soon to be 1.4.0pre4... Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./.. -I../../boost -O2 -g -pipe -Wall

Re: lyx-1.4.0pre4, gcc-4.1.0 failure

2006-01-31 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 13:48, Rex Dieter wrote: > Another failure, now with pre4 (this one seems not so trivial): I will let Lars get the credits for the fix. ;-) -- José Abílio