Or use Gnu Stow to keep the new installation tucked safely away from the
normal Debian tree structure. The Gnu documentation is good, and there are
a number of good tutorials. Best of both worlds since you don't destroy the
basic Debian structure with the risky PPA and you can still have the new
Thanks to all. As I have 5 employees who also use lyx (we run a Gates-free
office) and we edit each other's documents, I think it best to await the next
release of Debian - even if I miss a few goodies in the interim.
John
On Saturday, December 12, 2020 2:47:28 PM PST Dr Eberhard W Lisse
I would try the PPA on a testsystem before changing in production, in your
situation. That would then update with the usual “apt update”.
I like bleeding edge, tip of the spear, crack of my ass, to quote... but use
homebrew on the mac so as to not have to do anything manually which is
On 12/12/20 4:18 PM, John White wrote:
This sounds like an excellent way to keep lyx up to date, but I am clueless
about alternative repositories. If they require github, I'm not interested.
Lyx 2.3.2 ships with Debian Buster and it works fine for my purposes. I have
learned that adding
This sounds like an excellent way to keep lyx up to date, but I am clueless
about alternative repositories. If they require github, I'm not interested.
Lyx 2.3.2 ships with Debian Buster and it works fine for my purposes. I have
learned that adding software versions not in the Buster
On Friday, December 11, 2020 5:32:44 PM WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> I'm a little puzzled why you would need that. LyX uses Qt, yes, but
> packages like that typically involve some kind of communication between
> Qt and Gtk. I don't know why LyX would need that.
I would expect for those
On 12/12/20 5:47 AM, Hartmut Haase wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>> I'm a little puzzled why you would need that. LyX uses Qt, yes, but
> if I install LyX from the distribution it is about 9 month older than
> the last release. Because this one does not have binaries for all
> distributions, I use to
Hartmut,
would a better approach not be an alternative repository from which the
package manager then can install the latest DEB?
el
On 2020-12-12 12:47 , Hartmut Haase wrote:
Hi Richard,
I'm a little puzzled why you would need that. LyX uses Qt, yes, but
if I install LyX from the
Am Sat, 12 Dec 2020 11:38:08 +0100
schrieb Hartmut Haase :
> Hi Kornel,
Hi Hartmut, its long time since your last mails ...
> > Do you compile with automake or cmake?
>
> the compile steps are
> autogen.sh
> configure
> make
>
> configure cannot find theQt Library
> --
> Viele Grüße,
>
Hi Richard,
I'm a little puzzled why you would need that. LyX uses Qt, yes, but
if I install LyX from the distribution it is about 9 month older than
the last release. Because this one does not have binaries for all
distributions, I use to compile myself. Therefore I need the Qt library
files.
Hi Kornel,
Do you compile with automake or cmake?
the compile steps are
autogen.sh
configure
make
configure cannot find theQt Library
--
Viele Grüße,
Hartmut
Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com
Das heutige Motto:
Die Welt, die wir geschaffen haben, ist das Resultat einer
überholten
11 matches
Mail list logo