Re: Editing equations in 1.4.0 much clumsier than in 1.3.5!

version 1.3.5 was doing pretty well. I am using lyx on a Linux machine that is remotely maintained, therefore I do not have control over which packages have been installed. However, 'lyx --version' reports that the front-end is qt 3.3.3. Davide Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Davide == Davide

Re: Editing equations in 1.4.0 much clumsier than in 1.3.5!

version 1.3.5 was doing pretty well. I am using lyx on a Linux machine that is remotely maintained, therefore I do not have control over which packages have been installed. However, 'lyx --version' reports that the front-end is qt 3.3.3. Davide Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Davide == Davide

Re: Editing equations in 1.4.0 much clumsier than in 1.3.5!

version 1.3.5 was doing pretty well. I am using lyx on a Linux machine that is remotely maintained, therefore I do not have control over which packages have been installed. However, 'lyx --version' reports that the front-end is qt 3.3.3. Davide Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Davide"

Editing equations in 1.4.0 much clumsier than in 1.3.5!

Hello, I am using LyX on a Debian-powered x86 machine. I switched back to version 1.3.5 since editing in math mode (i.e., inside the magenta-coloured boxes created with Ctrl+M or Ctrl+Shift+M) is way better there than in version 1.4.0! Here are a few frustrating bad behaviours that I found

Editing equations in 1.4.0 much clumsier than in 1.3.5!

Hello, I am using LyX on a Debian-powered x86 machine. I switched back to version 1.3.5 since editing in math mode (i.e., inside the magenta-coloured boxes created with Ctrl+M or Ctrl+Shift+M) is way better there than in version 1.4.0! Here are a few frustrating bad behaviours that I found

Editing equations in 1.4.0 much clumsier than in 1.3.5!

Hello, I am using LyX on a Debian-powered x86 machine. I switched back to version 1.3.5 since editing in math mode (i.e., inside the magenta-coloured boxes created with Ctrl+M or Ctrl+Shift+M) is way better there than in version 1.4.0! Here are a few frustrating "bad behaviours" that I

Re: Getting LyX to replace custom-defined symbols as if they were standard LaTeX symbols

Hello, Thanks for your reply and your example with \nicefraction. I did as you wrote but not get the instant preview to work, but the solution with math-macro works as wished and rocks! Thank you very much! D. Johan Ingvast wrote: On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Davide Cescato wrote: Hello, I am writing

Re: Getting LyX to replace custom-defined symbols as if they were standard LaTeX symbols

Hello, Thanks for your reply and your example with \nicefraction. I did as you wrote but not get the instant preview to work, but the solution with math-macro works as wished and rocks! Thank you very much! D. Johan Ingvast wrote: On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Davide Cescato wrote: Hello, I am writing

Re: Getting LyX to replace custom-defined symbols as if they were standard LaTeX symbols

Hello, Thanks for your reply and your example with \nicefraction. I did as you wrote but not get the instant preview to work, but the solution with math-macro works as wished and rocks! Thank you very much! D. Johan Ingvast wrote: On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Davide Cescato wrote: Hello, I am writing

Getting LyX to replace custom-defined symbols as if they were standard LaTeX symbols

Hello, I am writing a draft for an article and I am still unsure about the names of some variables I am going to use in my final version. In order to handle this situation, in LaTeX I would define \newcommand{\ntx}{N_T} \newcommand{\nrx}{N_R} and then use \ntx and \nrx in my formulas whenever

Getting LyX to replace custom-defined symbols as if they were standard LaTeX symbols

Hello, I am writing a draft for an article and I am still unsure about the names of some variables I am going to use in my final version. In order to handle this situation, in LaTeX I would define \newcommand{\ntx}{N_T} \newcommand{\nrx}{N_R} and then use \ntx and \nrx in my formulas whenever

Getting LyX to replace custom-defined symbols as if they were standard LaTeX symbols

Hello, I am writing a draft for an article and I am still unsure about the names of some variables I am going to use in my final version. In order to handle this situation, in LaTeX I would define \newcommand{\ntx}{N_T} \newcommand{\nrx}{N_R} and then use \ntx and \nrx in my formulas whenever