Excellent!
Cheers, Sam
rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, there's no known bug for that. What platform, etc, are you on?
See 5464 for more:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5464
Cheers, Sam
Hi,
Is there a mini-buffer command for setting Section, Subsection, or
Subsubsection?
The layout menu for these three commands seems not to work in 1.6.0-RC4. I
presume this bug has been filed. If not let me know and I file it.
Cheers, Sam
rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The layout menu for these three commands seems not to work in 1.6.0-RC4. I
presume this bug has been filed. If not let me know and I file it.
No, there's no known bug for that. What platform, etc, are you on?
GNU/Linux, Debian. I'll go ahead and make
rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what happens when you try to use the layout combo? Just nothing? If
you run from a terminal, do you get any messages? Try lyx -dbg all,
and see if you get any messages when you try the layout thingy.
Setting debug level to all
Hi,
It's great to to have the 1.6.0~beta4-1 package in experimental, with matching
dependencies of testing. Thank you kindly, maintainer Sven Hoexter, for your
effort!
Does anyone know whether, RC5 is a candidate for experimental? Or how close is
1.6.0 to make it into any Debian stream?
This
Excellent!
Cheers, Sam
rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, there's no known bug for that. What platform, etc, are you on?
See 5464 for more:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5464
Cheers, Sam
Hi,
Is there a mini-buffer command for setting Section, Subsection, or
Subsubsection?
The layout menu for these three commands seems not to work in 1.6.0-RC4. I
presume this bug has been filed. If not let me know and I file it.
Cheers, Sam
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The layout menu for these three commands seems not to work in 1.6.0-RC4. I
> > presume this bug has been filed. If not let me know and I file it.
> >
> >
> No, there's no known bug for that. What platform, etc, are you on?
GNU/Linux, Debian. I'll go
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So what happens when you try to use the layout combo? Just nothing? If
> you run from a terminal, do you get any messages? Try "lyx -dbg all",
> and see if you get any messages when you try the layout thingy.
Setting debug level to all
Hi,
It's great to to have the 1.6.0~beta4-1 package in "experimental", with matching
dependencies of "testing". Thank you kindly, maintainer Sven Hoexter, for your
effort!
Does anyone know whether, RC5 is a candidate for "experimental"? Or how close is
1.6.0 to make it into any Debian stream?
Excellent!
Cheers, Sam
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, there's no known bug for that. What platform, etc, are you on?
>
See 5464 for more:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5464
Cheers, Sam
Hi,
Is there a mini-buffer command for setting "Section", "Subsection", or
"Subsubsection"?
The layout menu for these three commands seems not to work in 1.6.0-RC4. I
presume this bug has been filed. If not let me know and I file it.
Cheers, Sam
Hi,
You may have come across this. Ulteo is a Linux distribution that appears to
draws on concepts of cloud computing.
There is an online (KDE) desktop available that has a set of standard Linux
applications such as as openoffice and the likes. With 1GB storage space per
account at their
Hi,
You may have come across this. Ulteo is a Linux distribution that appears to
draws on concepts of cloud computing.
There is an online (KDE) desktop available that has a set of standard Linux
applications such as as openoffice and the likes. With 1GB storage space per
account at their
Hi,
You may have come across this. Ulteo is a Linux distribution that appears to
draws on concepts of cloud computing.
There is an online (KDE) desktop available that has a set of standard Linux
applications such as as openoffice and the likes. With 1GB storage space per
account at their
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Sven,
I'll keep it on list because some of the topics might
help people eventually creating Ubuntu backports to do it right.
Fine!
[...]
Again, what kind of LyX users are there? Why link LyX to a specific
latex? Would there be anyone who does
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:26:48PM +, Sam Lewis wrote:
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moin moin,
a) The social/trust problem
[...]
What solution could you think of? Does the development team use key?
Well the Debian project has
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Building real Debian packages is called backporting in this case.
You don't have to recreate the whole package because you can base
it on the work already done.
Add a deb-src line for unstable to your sources.list and
apt-get update apt-get
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Sven,
I'll keep it on list because some of the topics might
help people eventually creating Ubuntu backports to do it right.
Fine!
[...]
Again, what kind of LyX users are there? Why link LyX to a specific
latex? Would there be anyone who does
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:26:48PM +, Sam Lewis wrote:
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moin moin,
a) The social/trust problem
[...]
What solution could you think of? Does the development team use key?
Well the Debian project has
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Building real Debian packages is called backporting in this case.
You don't have to recreate the whole package because you can base
it on the work already done.
Add a deb-src line for unstable to your sources.list and
apt-get update apt-get
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sven,
> I'll keep it on list because some of the topics might
> help people eventually creating Ubuntu backports to do it right.
Fine!
[...]
> > Again, what kind of LyX users are there? Why link LyX to a specific
> > latex? Would there be anyone who
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:26:48PM +0000, Sam Lewis wrote:
> > Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Moin moin,
> > > a) The social/trust problem
> [...]
> > What solution could you think of? Do
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Building real Debian packages is called backporting in this case.
> You don't have to recreate the whole package because you can base
> it on the work already done.
>
> Add a deb-src line for unstable to your sources.list and
> apt-get update &&
Hi,
Available LyX 1.5.3 checkinstall packages for *etch* and *dapper* on
ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming/
lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_dapper.deb
lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_etch.deb
lyx_1.5.3_i386_dapper.README
lyx_1.5.3_i386_etch.README
Could someone please move them to the appropriate place. Many thanks!
Cheers,
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sam please don't take it as an offense but I'd highly recommend to not
use those checkinstall packages for Debian/etch. The same reasoning
apply for Ubuntu so you might want to read on as an Ubuntu user
aswell.
Hi Sven,
Thank you for your concern!
To
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just uploaded them to ftp.lyx.org.
Thanks!
Cheers, Sam
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To be clear there are two sides of the story to consider:
Thank you for your comprehensive account, trying to shed light on the
situation!
a) The social/trust problem
There's someone providing binarys build on an unknown system with under
unknown
Hi,
Available LyX 1.5.3 checkinstall packages for *etch* and *dapper* on
ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming/
lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_dapper.deb
lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_etch.deb
lyx_1.5.3_i386_dapper.README
lyx_1.5.3_i386_etch.README
Could someone please move them to the appropriate place. Many thanks!
Cheers,
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sam please don't take it as an offense but I'd highly recommend to not
use those checkinstall packages for Debian/etch. The same reasoning
apply for Ubuntu so you might want to read on as an Ubuntu user
aswell.
Hi Sven,
Thank you for your concern!
To
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just uploaded them to ftp.lyx.org.
Thanks!
Cheers, Sam
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To be clear there are two sides of the story to consider:
Thank you for your comprehensive account, trying to shed light on the
situation!
a) The social/trust problem
There's someone providing binarys build on an unknown system with under
unknown
Hi,
Available LyX 1.5.3 checkinstall packages for *etch* and *dapper* on
ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming/
lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_dapper.deb
lyx_1.5.3-1_i386_etch.deb
lyx_1.5.3_i386_dapper.README
lyx_1.5.3_i386_etch.README
Could someone please move them to the appropriate place. Many thanks!
Cheers,
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sam please don't take it as an offense but I'd highly recommend to not
> use those checkinstall packages for Debian/etch. The same reasoning
> apply for Ubuntu so you might want to read on as an Ubuntu user
> aswell.
Hi Sven,
Thank you for your
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just uploaded them to ftp.lyx.org.
Thanks!
Cheers, Sam
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To be clear there are two sides of the story to consider:
Thank you for your comprehensive account, trying to shed light on the
situation!
> a) The social/trust problem
> There's someone providing binarys build on an unknown system with under
>
Hi,
I've worked on a document that includes cross-references, on one
computer; now on another, fig n on the next page appears in a
different language, despite that the document settings for language
is set to British. Why is this the case and how could I change this?
Cheers, Sam
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:15:47 +0200 Helge Hafting wrote:
If the file now is wrong on both computers, then the error
likely is in the file itself. Move the cursor to the cross reference,
check if it gets an underline there, indicating a language change.
In this case, select the region with
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:27:29 -0300 Waldir Leôncio wrote:
Olá, pessoal! Estou com problemas para mostrar imagens quando exporto
meu documento LyX para DVI. Já tentei diversos formatos (BMP, JPG,
GIF, TIF, EPS e até PDF), mas nada. Tudo o que aparece é um retângulo
com as bordas pretas ao redor
Hi,
I've worked on a document that includes cross-references, on one
computer; now on another, fig n on the next page appears in a
different language, despite that the document settings for language
is set to British. Why is this the case and how could I change this?
Cheers, Sam
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:15:47 +0200 Helge Hafting wrote:
If the file now is wrong on both computers, then the error
likely is in the file itself. Move the cursor to the cross reference,
check if it gets an underline there, indicating a language change.
In this case, select the region with
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:27:29 -0300 Waldir Leôncio wrote:
Olá, pessoal! Estou com problemas para mostrar imagens quando exporto
meu documento LyX para DVI. Já tentei diversos formatos (BMP, JPG,
GIF, TIF, EPS e até PDF), mas nada. Tudo o que aparece é um retângulo
com as bordas pretas ao redor
Hi,
I've worked on a document that includes cross-references, on one
computer; now on another, "fig n on the next page" appears in a
different language, despite that the document settings for language
is set to "British". Why is this the case and how could I change this?
Cheers, Sam
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:15:47 +0200 Helge Hafting wrote:
> If the file now is wrong on both computers, then the error
> likely is in the file itself. Move the cursor to the cross reference,
> check if it gets an underline there, indicating a language change.
> In this case, select the region with
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:27:29 -0300 Waldir Leôncio wrote:
> Olá, pessoal! Estou com problemas para mostrar imagens quando exporto
> meu documento LyX para DVI. Já tentei diversos formatos (BMP, JPG,
> GIF, TIF, EPS e até PDF), mas nada. Tudo o que aparece é um retângulo
> com as bordas pretas ao
Appreciated!
Cheers, Sam
Appreciated!
Cheers, Sam
Appreciated!
Cheers, Sam
Richard, lets agree to differ for the time being and see how resources can be
best used for continuing the project in a meaningful way.
Cheers, Sam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicely phrased! I think it should be added somewhere to the wiki, although
I don't know where. Perhaps a page discussing the focus/purpose/idea of
LyX and WYSIWYM? Any ideas of where?
I'm thinking that such a page would be a good reference when explaining
what
Richard, lets agree to differ for the time being and see how resources can be
best used for continuing the project in a meaningful way.
Cheers, Sam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicely phrased! I think it should be added somewhere to the wiki, although
I don't know where. Perhaps a page discussing the focus/purpose/idea of
LyX and WYSIWYM? Any ideas of where?
I'm thinking that such a page would be a good reference when explaining
what
Richard, lets agree to differ for the time being and see how resources can be
best used for continuing the project in a meaningful way.
Cheers, Sam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nicely phrased! I think it should be added somewhere to the wiki, although
> I don't know where. Perhaps a page discussing the focus/purpose/idea of
> LyX and WYSIWYM? Any ideas of where?
>
> I'm thinking that such a page would be a good reference when explaining
Of course. And anyone who wants to code this can do so. This was in
response to the suggestion that LyX lacked this incredibly wonderful and
painfully obvious feature. My point was that it isn't obviously
wonderful. Indeed, I'd go so far as to say that, if you think you want
it, you're
Of course. And anyone who wants to code this can do so. This was in
response to the suggestion that LyX lacked this incredibly wonderful and
painfully obvious feature. My point was that it isn't obviously
wonderful. Indeed, I'd go so far as to say that, if you think you want
it, you're
> Of course. And anyone who wants to code this can do so. This was in
> response to the suggestion that LyX lacked this incredibly wonderful and
> painfully obvious feature. My point was that it isn't obviously
> wonderful. Indeed, I'd go so far as to say that, if you think you want
> it,
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although the implementation
Hi Mike (and others),
My spelling is so bad, that it's usually better to just get one with what
I want to write and then correct at the end.
On a side note, my spelling is not very good either, but I found that it has
improved through the use of an immediate indication. This also gives me
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although the implementation
Hi Mike (and others),
My spelling is so bad, that it's usually better to just get one with what
I want to write and then correct at the end.
On a side note, my spelling is not very good either, but I found that it has
improved through the use of an immediate indication. This also gives me
I also would like to express my support for a on-the-fly-spellchecker. It would
bring LyX in line with other similar editors, where such a feature has been
standard for many year. A feature poll in our wiki has indicated an overwhelming
support for it by many LyX users. Although the implementation
Hi Mike (and others),
> My spelling is so bad, that it's usually better to just get one with what
> I want to write and then correct at the end.
On a side note, my spelling is not very good either, but I found that it has
improved through the use of an "immediate indication". This also gives me
LyX is great! And the recent developments are indeed very impressive. Thanks to
the whole development team and supporters.
I'm particularly taken by the new outliner being implemented as dock widget.
Thanks Able! By gone the labourous days of shifting windows back and forth,
the drudgery of
LyX is great! And the recent developments are indeed very impressive. Thanks to
the whole development team and supporters.
I'm particularly taken by the new outliner being implemented as dock widget.
Thanks Able! By gone the labourous days of shifting windows back and forth,
the drudgery of
LyX is great! And the recent developments are indeed very impressive. Thanks to
the whole development team and supporters.
I'm particularly taken by the new outliner being implemented as dock widget.
Thanks Able! By gone the "labourous" days of shifting windows back and forth,
the drudgery of
Charles wrote:
URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38743
Normally, in English typography, acronyms are set in upper case. But
rules are made to be bent and the invention of computer typography
gave new possibilities and wordprocessor gave bad habits to writers
and
Charles wrote:
URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38743
Normally, in English typography, acronyms are set in upper case. But
rules are made to be bent and the invention of computer typography
gave new possibilities and wordprocessor gave bad habits to writers
and
Charles wrote:
URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38743
>
> Normally, in English typography, acronyms are set in upper case. But
> rules are made to be bent and the invention of computer typography
> gave new possibilities and wordprocessor gave bad habits to writers
> and
On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:13:16 GMT
Steve Litt wrote:
URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38713
I'm pretty sure you can do this: Create an environment that makes its
paragraph italic. Then create a character style that puts its
characters in smallcaps. Apply the environemnt
On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:24:35 GMT
Charles de Miramon wrote:
URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38724
In traditional European typography (before the computer), there are
no italic (or bold) small capitals. If you are a purist typographer,
you should not used italic small
On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:13:16 GMT
Steve Litt wrote:
URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38713
I'm pretty sure you can do this: Create an environment that makes its
paragraph italic. Then create a character style that puts its
characters in smallcaps. Apply the environemnt
On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:24:35 GMT
Charles de Miramon wrote:
URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38724
In traditional European typography (before the computer), there are
no italic (or bold) small capitals. If you are a purist typographer,
you should not used italic small
On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:13:16 GMT
Steve Litt wrote:
> URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38713
> I'm pretty sure you can do this: Create an environment that makes its
> paragraph italic. Then create a character style that puts its
> characters in smallcaps. Apply the
On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:24:35 GMT
Charles de Miramon wrote:
> URL: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/38724
> In traditional European typography (before the computer), there are
> no italic (or bold) small capitals. If you are a purist typographer,
> you should not used italic
Urtzi Jauregi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
switch to Texlive LyX, will I find any surprises the evening before I
submit my thesis to press? What are your experiences?
TexLive2007 work well for me!
Cheers, Sam
Urtzi Jauregi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
switch to Texlive LyX, will I find any surprises the evening before I
submit my thesis to press? What are your experiences?
TexLive2007 work well for me!
Cheers, Sam
Urtzi Jauregi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> switch to Texlive & LyX, will I find any surprises the evening before I
> submit my thesis to press? What are your experiences?
TexLive2007 work well for me!
Cheers, Sam
Bob Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My system is Windows XP Pro with all updates, Lyx 1.4.4
I managed to get Lyx on my machine, but it doesn't work. When I try to
open a template it says Document has a missing Tex class article or
what ever template I am trying to open. No output is
Bob Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My system is Windows XP Pro with all updates, Lyx 1.4.4
I managed to get Lyx on my machine, but it doesn't work. When I try to
open a template it says Document has a missing Tex class article or
what ever template I am trying to open. No output is
Bob Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> My system is Windows XP Pro with all updates, Lyx 1.4.4
>
> I managed to get Lyx on my machine, but it doesn't work. When I try to
> open a template it says "Document has a missing Tex class article" or
> what ever template I am trying to open. No
Hi,
What is the best way to emphasise (italicise) a whole paragraph while retaining
abbreviations in small caps?
Cheers, Sam
Tricky, as latex doesn't seem to support italicised small caps fonts.
I guess you can acheive this if you have such a font, and insert
all the latex commands necessary to switch it on and off as necessary.
Thanks Helge for your neat ERT tip!
Support for italicised small caps fonts is what I'm
Hi,
What is the best way to emphasise (italicise) a whole paragraph while retaining
abbreviations in small caps?
Cheers, Sam
Tricky, as latex doesn't seem to support italicised small caps fonts.
I guess you can acheive this if you have such a font, and insert
all the latex commands necessary to switch it on and off as necessary.
Thanks Helge for your neat ERT tip!
Support for italicised small caps fonts is what I'm
Hi,
What is the best way to emphasise (italicise) a whole paragraph while retaining
abbreviations in small caps?
Cheers, Sam
> Tricky, as latex doesn't seem to support italicised small caps fonts.
> I guess you can acheive this if you have such a font, and insert
> all the latex commands necessary to switch it on and off as necessary.
Thanks Helge for your neat ERT tip!
Support for italicised small caps fonts is what
Take a serious look at the biblatex package. It is an amazing new tool
without the mistakes that were made in the early years of jurabib.
Thanks for the info. The biblatex development does indeed sound very
interesting.
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/exptl/biblatex/
Cheers,
Take a serious look at the biblatex package. It is an amazing new tool
without the mistakes that were made in the early years of jurabib.
Thanks for the info. The biblatex development does indeed sound very
interesting.
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/exptl/biblatex/
Cheers,
> Take a serious look at the biblatex package. It is an amazing new tool
> without the mistakes that were made in the early years of jurabib.
Thanks for the info. The biblatex development does indeed sound very
interesting.
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/exptl/biblatex/
Cheers,
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[]
The only difference between figure floats and table floats is the
captions they get - and the former may be listed in the list of figures
while the latter may be listed in the list of tables. They don't
Thanks! I somehow received lost of latex
Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Insert-Short Title
Excellent - thanks!
Cheers, Sam
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[]
The only difference between figure floats and table floats is the
captions they get - and the former may be listed in the list of figures
while the latter may be listed in the list of tables. They don't
Thanks! I somehow received lost of latex
Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Insert-Short Title
Excellent - thanks!
Cheers, Sam
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[]
> The only difference between "figure" floats and "table" floats is the
> captions they get - and the former may be listed in the "list of figures"
> while the latter may be listed in the "list of tables". They don't
Thanks! I somehow received lost
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Insert->Short Title
Excellent - thanks!
Cheers, Sam
Yes it is possible!
I can report it's possible to float (with figure float or text wrap float) a
Box (Shadowbox) that contains another Box (minipage) containing a table. To
avoid latex errors attention to usage of special formatting features (such as
protect spaces, etc.) might has to be paid
101 - 200 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
