Hi,
On Friday 25 May 2007, Charles de Miramon wrote:
The TeX4ht package in Debian (and I guess in Ubuntu) was unmaintained and
quite broken. New versions are better.
OK, thanks for this. I posted something yesterday on the Ubuntu forums. Since
it seems to not just be me, I'll file it as a
Dear Enrico,
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
(see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
but OpenOffice is not able to
Hi,
On Friday 25 May 2007, Charles de Miramon wrote:
The TeX4ht package in Debian (and I guess in Ubuntu) was unmaintained and
quite broken. New versions are better.
OK, thanks for this. I posted something yesterday on the Ubuntu forums. Since
it seems to not just be me, I'll file it as a
Dear Enrico,
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
(see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
but OpenOffice is not able to
Hi,
On Friday 25 May 2007, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> The TeX4ht package in Debian (and I guess in Ubuntu) was unmaintained and
> quite broken. New versions are better.
OK, thanks for this. I posted something yesterday on the Ubuntu forums. Since
it seems to not just be me, I'll file it as a
Dear Enrico,
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Notice that OpenOffice is at fault here and not latex2rtf.
> By default, latex2rtf uses EQ field codes for translating math constructs
> (see http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/word/HP051861481033.aspx)
> but OpenOffice is not able
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable exception: super- and
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission of papers.
Try
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable exception: super- and
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
submission of papers.
Try
Hello,
At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX, and so
it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final submission
of papers. In LyX 1.5.0beta3 (and also in the 1.4 series), exporting to RTF
works well with a notable exception: super- and
Dear Richard,
Thanks very much for your response.
On Thursday 24 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote:
> Tim Holy wrote:
> > At least in the biological sciences, most journals can't accept LaTeX,
> > and so it's important for us to be able to export to RTF format for final
> >
Hello,
I'm relatively new to using LyX. I'd played around with it a year or two ago,
but (perhaps out of inertia more than anything else) returned to directly
writing the latex with a text editor. Now I'm using LyX 1.4.3, and I have to
say that I'm quite impressed. Thanks to the developers for
control (having files named main_ver1.lyx,
main_ver2.lyx, suppl_ver1.lyx, suppl_ver2.lyx, etc) and that might require
some thought about how to migrate all the cross-references over to a file
with a different name.
Best,
--Tim
On Friday 04 May 2007, John Pye wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
Hello
Hello,
I'm relatively new to using LyX. I'd played around with it a year or two ago,
but (perhaps out of inertia more than anything else) returned to directly
writing the latex with a text editor. Now I'm using LyX 1.4.3, and I have to
say that I'm quite impressed. Thanks to the developers for
control (having files named main_ver1.lyx,
main_ver2.lyx, suppl_ver1.lyx, suppl_ver2.lyx, etc) and that might require
some thought about how to migrate all the cross-references over to a file
with a different name.
Best,
--Tim
On Friday 04 May 2007, John Pye wrote:
Tim Holy wrote:
Hello
Hello,
I'm relatively new to using LyX. I'd played around with it a year or two ago,
but (perhaps out of inertia more than anything else) returned to directly
writing the latex with a text editor. Now I'm using LyX 1.4.3, and I have to
say that I'm quite impressed. Thanks to the developers for
e manual version control (having files named main_ver1.lyx,
main_ver2.lyx, suppl_ver1.lyx, suppl_ver2.lyx, etc) and that might require
some thought about how to migrate all the cross-references over to a file
with a different name.
Best,
--Tim
On Friday 04 May 2007, John Pye wrote:
the command line. Am I specifying the strings and/or quoting
incorrectly?
--Tim Holy
the command line. Am I specifying the strings and/or quoting
incorrectly?
--Tim Holy
date '+%B %d, %Y'
works from the command line. Am I specifying the strings and/or quoting
incorrectly?
--Tim Holy
21 matches
Mail list logo
