I don't know why, but it seems that my message send on 07-17-02 has not
reached the list. So here it's again:
==
=
Due to the new usage of images inside LyX 1.2.0 compared to prior releases
it took a longer time to build
I don't know why, but it seems that my message send on 07-17-02 has not
reached the list. So here it's again:
==
=
Due to the new usage of images inside LyX 1.2.0 compared to prior releases
it took a longer time to build
I don't know why, but it seems that my message send on 07-17-02 has not
reached the list. So here it's again:
==
=
Due to the new usage of images inside LyX 1.2.0 compared to prior releases
it took a longer time to build
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 19:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
You should have no problems upgrading from LyX versions 1.1.5 and 1.1.6. It is
nevertheless recommended that you keep backups of important documents. Most
documents will load in 1.2.0 without problems. Older versions of LyX cannot
On 1 Jun, Robin wrote:
sometimes (found this out after I had to downgrade!).
Why did you do so?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
138 Highland Ave. #10
Somerville, Ma 02143
(617) 623-1488
Ask not for whom the telephone bell tolls ... if thou art in the
bathtub, it tolls for thee.
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 02:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 1 Jun, Robin wrote:
sometimes (found this out after I had to downgrade!).
Why did you do so?
On my current system, LyX 1.2 won't produce Latin5 (iso-8859-9)
characters. It's logged as bug 413, IIRC.
Robin
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 19:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
You should have no problems upgrading from LyX versions 1.1.5 and 1.1.6. It is
nevertheless recommended that you keep backups of important documents. Most
documents will load in 1.2.0 without problems. Older versions of LyX cannot
On 1 Jun, Robin wrote:
sometimes (found this out after I had to downgrade!).
Why did you do so?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
138 Highland Ave. #10
Somerville, Ma 02143
(617) 623-1488
Ask not for whom the telephone bell tolls ... if thou art in the
bathtub, it tolls for thee.
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 02:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 1 Jun, Robin wrote:
sometimes (found this out after I had to downgrade!).
Why did you do so?
On my current system, LyX 1.2 won't produce Latin5 (iso-8859-9)
characters. It's logged as bug 413, IIRC.
Robin
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 19:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>
> You should have no problems upgrading from LyX versions 1.1.5 and 1.1.6. It is
> nevertheless recommended that you keep backups of important documents. Most
> documents will load in 1.2.0 without problems. Older versions of LyX
On 1 Jun, Robin wrote:
> sometimes (found this out after I had to downgrade!).
Why did you do so?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
138 Highland Ave. #10
Somerville, Ma 02143
(617) 623-1488
Ask not for whom the telephone bell tolls ... if thou art in the
bathtub, it tolls for thee.
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 02:37, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 1 Jun, Robin wrote:
> > sometimes (found this out after I had to downgrade!).
>
> Why did you do so?
On my current system, LyX 1.2 won't produce Latin5 (iso-8859-9)
characters. It's logged as bug 413, IIRC.
Robin
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi All,
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Regards
Fred
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:17:30AM +1000, fb wrote:
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Hm. Could you try an official compiler (2.95, 3.0 or 3.1)?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html, especially:
If you encounter a bug in a compiler labeled 2.96, we suggest you
contact whoever
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Andre,
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say?
--
Lgb
fb == fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
fb Hi Andre, g++ --version says: 2.96
Look on the redhat site if there is an update for your gcc packages.
gcc in original rh7.0 is known to be very buggy, so you should
_really_ update to the latest they propose (of course getting gcc 3.1
is better, but
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm
Just get those packages and do rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm on them.
It's a good idea since earlier RPM versions have an optimiser bug that
make LyX crash and burn too :)
regards
john
--
Do you mean to tell me
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi All,
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Regards
Fred
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:17:30AM +1000, fb wrote:
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Hm. Could you try an official compiler (2.95, 3.0 or 3.1)?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html, especially:
If you encounter a bug in a compiler labeled 2.96, we suggest you
contact whoever
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Andre,
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say?
--
Lgb
fb == fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
fb Hi Andre, g++ --version says: 2.96
Look on the redhat site if there is an update for your gcc packages.
gcc in original rh7.0 is known to be very buggy, so you should
_really_ update to the latest they propose (of course getting gcc 3.1
is better, but
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm
Just get those packages and do rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm on them.
It's a good idea since earlier RPM versions have an optimiser bug that
make LyX crash and burn too :)
regards
john
--
Do you mean to tell me
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi All,
>
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
>
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
> % g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
What says 'g++ --version'?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Hi Andre,
g++ --version says: 2.96
Regards
Fred
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:28:40AM +1000, fb wrote:
>
>>% g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
>>
>
>What says 'g++ --version'?
>
>Andre'
>
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:17:30AM +1000, fb wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> g++ --version says: 2.96
Hm. Could you try an "official" compiler (2.95, 3.0 or 3.1)?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html, especially:
If you encounter a bug in a compiler labeled 2.96, we suggest you
contact whoever
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Andre,
>
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does "rpm -qa | grep gcc" say?
--
Lgb
> "fb" == fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
fb> Hi Andre, g++ --version says: 2.96
Look on the redhat site if there is an update for your gcc packages.
gcc in original rh7.0 is known to be very buggy, so you should
_really_ update to the latest they propose (of course getting gcc 3.1
is
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
>
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
>
>
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> gcc-2.96-85.i386.rpm
>
> Just get those packages and do "rpm -Uvh gcc*.rpm" on them.
It's a good idea since earlier RPM versions have an optimiser bug that
make LyX crash and burn too :)
regards
john
--
"Do you mean to
After too long a wait, the LyX team are pleased to announce the new stable
release, 1.2.0.
This release has far too many bugfixes and new features to list
comprehensively, but some are listed below.
You can download LyX 1.2.0 here :
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.2.0.tar.gz
I've just seen in on linuxtoday.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
After too long a wait, the LyX team are pleased to announce the new stable
release, 1.2.0.
This release has far too many bugfixes and new features to list
comprehensively, but some are listed below.
You can download LyX 1.2.0 here :
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.2.0.tar.gz
I've just seen in on linuxtoday.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
After too long a wait, the LyX team are pleased to announce the new stable
release, 1.2.0.
This release has far too many bugfixes and new features to list
comprehensively, but some are listed below.
You can download LyX 1.2.0 here :
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.2.0.tar.gz
I've just seen in on linuxtoday.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
42 matches
Mail list logo
