Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013, 14:39:07 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Hi,
still not done with Vancouver style
I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
which more than 2 authors are referenced as
author1 et al
Wolfgang
I found out how to solve it:
in
On 18/01/2013 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013, 14:39:07 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Hi,
still not done with Vancouver style
I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
which more than 2 authors are referenced as
author1 et al
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013, 14:39:07 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Hi,
still not done with Vancouver style
I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
which more than 2 authors are referenced as
author1 et al
Wolfgang
I found out how to solve it:
in
On 18/01/2013 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013, 14:39:07 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Hi,
still not done with Vancouver style
I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
which more than 2 authors are referenced as
author1 et al
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013, 14:39:07 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> Hi,
>
> still not done with Vancouver style
>
> I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
> which more than 2 authors are referenced as
> author1 et al
>
> Wolfgang
I found out how to solve it:
On 18/01/2013 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013, 14:39:07 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Hi,
still not done with Vancouver style
I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
which more than 2 authors are referenced as
author1 et al
Hi,
still not done with Vancouver style
I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
which more than 2 authors are referenced as
author1 et al
Wolfgang
Hi,
still not done with Vancouver style
I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
which more than 2 authors are referenced as
author1 et al
Wolfgang
Hi,
still not done with Vancouver style
I tried for quite some time but can't find the option for references, in
which more than 2 authors are referenced as
author1 et al
Wolfgang
De: Jacob Bishop bishop.ja...@gmail.com
May I ask why you are using \text ? To my knowledge, the \unit and \unitfrac
commands automatically ensure that the text is typeset upright. I seem to get
the correct output by using \unitfrac without using \text.
Then
De: Jacob Bishop bishop.ja...@gmail.com
May I ask why you are using \text ? To my knowledge, the \unit and \unitfrac
commands automatically ensure that the text is typeset upright. I seem to get
the correct output by using \unitfrac without using \text.
Then
De: Jacob Bishop
May I ask why you are using \text ? To my knowledge, the \unit and \unitfrac
commands automatically ensure that the text is typeset upright. I seem to get
the correct output by using \unitfrac without using \text.
Then
Hi,
Want to disable default in book class
\usepackage{units}
so I can use
\usepackage[ugly]{units}
because I'm getting
The package units has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[ugly]
Adding
El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 09:27 -0700, Jacob Bishop escribió:
Want to use
\usepackage[ugly]{units}
just for this document, you can just put
Providesunits 1
in the local layout under document-settings-local layout. Then it
works.
regularly
would turn
El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 13:41 -0300, martin escribió:
El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 09:27 -0700, Jacob Bishop escribió:
Want to use
\usepackage[ugly]{units}
just for this document, you can just put
Providesunits 1
in the local layout under
Martin,
May I ask why you are using \text ? To my knowledge, the \unit and
\unitfrac commands automatically ensure that the text is typeset upright. I
seem to get the correct output by using \unitfrac without using \text.
Then again, it isn't exactly clear to me what output you are looking for.
Hi,
Want to disable default in book class
\usepackage{units}
so I can use
\usepackage[ugly]{units}
because I'm getting
The package units has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[ugly]
Adding
El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 09:27 -0700, Jacob Bishop escribió:
Want to use
\usepackage[ugly]{units}
just for this document, you can just put
Providesunits 1
in the local layout under document-settings-local layout. Then it
works.
regularly
would turn
El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 13:41 -0300, martin escribió:
El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 09:27 -0700, Jacob Bishop escribió:
Want to use
\usepackage[ugly]{units}
just for this document, you can just put
Providesunits 1
in the local layout under
Martin,
May I ask why you are using \text ? To my knowledge, the \unit and
\unitfrac commands automatically ensure that the text is typeset upright. I
seem to get the correct output by using \unitfrac without using \text.
Then again, it isn't exactly clear to me what output you are looking for.
Hi,
Want to disable default in book class
\usepackage{units}
so I can use
\usepackage[ugly]{units}
because I'm getting
The package units has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[ugly]
Adding
El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 09:27 -0700, Jacob Bishop escribió:
> Want to use
> \usepackage[ugly]{units}
>
>
> just for this document, you can just put
> Providesunits 1
> in the local layout under document->settings->local layout. Then it
> works.
>
> regularly
>
El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 13:41 -0300, martin escribió:
> El lun, 17-12-2012 a las 09:27 -0700, Jacob Bishop escribió:
>
> > Want to use
> > \usepackage[ugly]{units}
> >
> >
> > just for this document, you can just put
> > Providesunits 1
> > in the local layout
Martin,
May I ask why you are using \text ? To my knowledge, the \unit and
\unitfrac commands automatically ensure that the text is typeset upright. I
seem to get the correct output by using \unitfrac without using \text.
Then again, it isn't exactly clear to me what output you are looking for.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/08/12 19:33, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine
in landscape by
using the lscape package and this works
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/08/12 19:33, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/08/12 19:33, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine
in landscape by
using the lscape package and this works
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/08/12 19:33, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/08/12 19:33, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine
>> in landscape by
>> using the lscape package and
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17/08/12 19:33, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>> I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine in
landscape by using
the lscape package and this works fine.
in LaTex, this looks as follow:
...
\begin{landscape}
\section{List of attendants}
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine in
landscape by using
the lscape package and this works fine.
in LaTex, this looks as follow:
...
\begin{landscape}
\section{List of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine in
landscape by using
the lscape package and this works fine.
in LaTex, this looks as follow:
...
\begin{landscape}
\section{List of attendants}
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine in
landscape by using
the lscape package and this works fine.
in LaTex, this looks as follow:
...
\begin{landscape}
\section{List of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine in
landscape by using
the lscape package and this works fine.
in LaTex, this looks as follow:
...
\begin{landscape}
\section{List of attendants}
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> I am inserting A gnumeric spreadsheet as extenal material which works fine in
> landscape by using
> the lscape package and this works fine.
>
> in LaTex, this looks as follow:
>
> ...
> \begin{landscape}
>
I would like to reduce the staff-size of the lilypond output and using #(set-
global-staff-size 16) in the lilypond code doesn't work so I guess I need to
change the lilypond-book options [staffsize=16] but I can't seem to do it from
within Lyx.
On 04/04/2012 5:58 AM, Tao Cumplido wrote:
I would like to reduce the staff-size of the lilypond output and using #(set-
global-staff-size 16) in the lilypond code doesn't work so I guess I need to
change the lilypond-book options [staffsize=16] but I can't seem to do it from
within Lyx.
You
Julien Rioux jrioux at physics.utoronto.ca writes:
You could make your own customized version of the lilypond.module file.
See Help Customization, especially read about LatexParam under Section
5.3.9 Flex insets and InsetLayout. So basically copying lilypond.module
to your user
I would like to reduce the staff-size of the lilypond output and using #(set-
global-staff-size 16) in the lilypond code doesn't work so I guess I need to
change the lilypond-book options [staffsize=16] but I can't seem to do it from
within Lyx.
On 04/04/2012 5:58 AM, Tao Cumplido wrote:
I would like to reduce the staff-size of the lilypond output and using #(set-
global-staff-size 16) in the lilypond code doesn't work so I guess I need to
change the lilypond-book options [staffsize=16] but I can't seem to do it from
within Lyx.
You
Julien Rioux jrioux at physics.utoronto.ca writes:
You could make your own customized version of the lilypond.module file.
See Help Customization, especially read about LatexParam under Section
5.3.9 Flex insets and InsetLayout. So basically copying lilypond.module
to your user
I would like to reduce the staff-size of the lilypond output and using #(set-
global-staff-size 16) in the lilypond code doesn't work so I guess I need to
change the lilypond-book options [staffsize=16] but I can't seem to do it from
within Lyx.
On 04/04/2012 5:58 AM, Tao Cumplido wrote:
I would like to reduce the staff-size of the lilypond output and using #(set-
global-staff-size 16) in the lilypond code doesn't work so I guess I need to
change the lilypond-book options [staffsize=16] but I can't seem to do it from
within Lyx.
You
Julien Rioux physics.utoronto.ca> writes:
>
> You could make your own customized version of the lilypond.module file.
> See Help > Customization, especially read about LatexParam under Section
> 5.3.9 Flex insets and InsetLayout. So basically copying lilypond.module
> to your user directory
to
show up as options under document settings fonts?
This depends:
* With use non tex fonts (i.e. XeTeX or LuaTeX with the fontspec
package), make sure that the fonts are known to the system.
* With 8-bit TeX engines (latex, pdflatex), vote for the bug to include
support for more font
to
show up as options under document settings fonts?
This depends:
* With use non tex fonts (i.e. XeTeX or LuaTeX with the fontspec
package), make sure that the fonts are known to the system.
Thanks, Guenter. A guy on the tex on mac osx listserv gave me a simple way to
install the fonts
to
show up as options under document settings fonts?
This depends:
* With use non tex fonts (i.e. XeTeX or LuaTeX with the fontspec
package), make sure that the fonts are known to the system.
* With 8-bit TeX engines (latex, pdflatex), vote for the bug to include
support for more font
to
show up as options under document settings fonts?
This depends:
* With use non tex fonts (i.e. XeTeX or LuaTeX with the fontspec
package), make sure that the fonts are known to the system.
Thanks, Guenter. A guy on the tex on mac osx listserv gave me a simple way to
install the fonts
how do I get them to
> show up as options under document > settings > fonts?
This depends:
* With "use non tex fonts" (i.e. XeTeX or LuaTeX with the fontspec
package), make sure that the fonts are known to the system.
* With 8-bit TeX engines (latex, pdflatex), vote for the bu
ations. So, how do I get them to
>> show up as options under document > settings > fonts?
>
> This depends:
>
> * With "use non tex fonts" (i.e. XeTeX or LuaTeX with the fontspec
> package), make sure that the fonts are known to the system.
Thanks, Guent
Planning to install the tex gyre fonts on my Mac, I inquired at tex on mac os
x, I was informed that they are already installed, i.e., that they come with
the tex live installations. So, how do I get them to show up as options under
document settings fonts?
Thanks
Planning to install the tex gyre fonts on my Mac, I inquired at tex on mac os
x, I was informed that they are already installed, i.e., that they come with
the tex live installations. So, how do I get them to show up as options under
document settings fonts?
Thanks
Planning to install the tex gyre fonts on my Mac, I inquired at tex on mac os
x, I was informed that they are already installed, i.e., that they come with
the tex live installations. So, how do I get them to show up as options under
document > settings > fonts?
Csikos Bela bcsikos...@freemail.hu írta:
Hello:
The biblatex users guide (Version 1.7, November 13, 2011)
on page 44, section 3.1.2.1 says:
The following options may be used in the optional argument to \usepackage as
well as in the configuration file and the document preamble.
How can I set
Hello:
The biblatex users guide (Version 1.7, November 13, 2011)
on page 44, section 3.1.2.1 says:
The following options may be used in the optional argument to \usepackage as
well as in the configuration file and the document preamble.
How can I set an option in the preamble? What would
Csikos Bela bcsikos...@freemail.hu írta:
Hello:
The biblatex users guide (Version 1.7, November 13, 2011)
on page 44, section 3.1.2.1 says:
The following options may be used in the optional argument to \usepackage as
well as in the configuration file and the document preamble.
How can I set
Hello:
The biblatex users guide (Version 1.7, November 13, 2011)
on page 44, section 3.1.2.1 says:
The following options may be used in the optional argument to \usepackage as
well as in the configuration file and the document preamble.
How can I set an option in the preamble? What would
Csikos Bela <bcsikos...@freemail.hu> írta:
>Hello:>
>
The biblatex users guide (Version 1.7, November 13, 2011)>
on page 44, section 3.1.2.1 says:>
>
"The following options may be used in the optional argument to \usepackage as
well as in the configuration file and t
Hello:
The biblatex users guide (Version 1.7, November 13, 2011)
on page 44, section 3.1.2.1 says:
"The following options may be used in the optional argument to \usepackage as
well as in the configuration file and the document preamble."
How can I set an option in the preamble?
not tell to Lyx to get options from the short name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
Style sageplot
LatexType Command
LatexName sageplot
Category Sage
OptionalArgs 1
Align Left
FreeSpacing 1
PassThru 1
. My declaration must
have a problem and does not tell to Lyx to get options from the short
name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
I think this is a known issue, actually. The problem is that PassThru
insets/styles/etc do not allow for optional arguments.
If you file a bug about
have a problem and
does not tell to Lyx to get options from the short name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
I think this is a known issue, actually. The problem is that PassThru
insets/styles/etc do not allow for optional arguments.
If you file a bug about this, I'll try to fix
arguments of the
\sageplot environment... I continue not to get the Short name option when I
right-click in this environment. My declaration must have a problem and
does not tell to Lyx to get options from the short name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
I think this is a known
not tell to Lyx to get options from the short name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
Style sageplot
LatexType Command
LatexName sageplot
Category Sage
OptionalArgs 1
Align Left
FreeSpacing 1
PassThru 1
. My declaration must
have a problem and does not tell to Lyx to get options from the short
name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
I think this is a known issue, actually. The problem is that PassThru
insets/styles/etc do not allow for optional arguments.
If you file a bug about
have a problem and
does not tell to Lyx to get options from the short name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
I think this is a known issue, actually. The problem is that PassThru
insets/styles/etc do not allow for optional arguments.
If you file a bug about this, I'll try to fix
arguments of the
\sageplot environment... I continue not to get the Short name option when I
right-click in this environment. My declaration must have a problem and
does not tell to Lyx to get options from the short name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
I think this is a known
not tell to Lyx to get options from the short name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
Style sageplot
LatexType Command
LatexName sageplot
Category Sage
OptionalArgs 1
Align Left
FreeSpacing 1
PassThru 1
. My declaration must
have a problem and does not tell to Lyx to get options from the short
name.
Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
I think this is a known issue, actually. The problem is that PassThru
insets/styles/etc do not allow for optional arguments.
If you file a bug about
plot environment... I continue not to get the Short name option when I
> right-click in this environment. My declaration must have a problem and
> does not tell to Lyx to get options from the short name.
>
> Can commands get a short name from Lyx?
>
> I think this is a known issue, actually.
alse
> OptionalArgs 0
> End
>
> Now, if I could also solve the problem for the optional arguments of the
> \sageplot environment... I continue not to get the Short name option when I
> right-click in this environment. My declaration must have a problem and
> does not t
When using the sectioned bibliography option, LyX automatically adds:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package, e.g.
\usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
James
On 06/22/2011 05:40 PM, James C. Sutherland wrote:
When using the sectioned bibliography option, LyX automatically adds:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package, e.g.
\usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
You can add
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
**
On 06/22/2011 05:40 PM, James C. Sutherland wrote:
When using the sectioned bibliography option, LyX automatically adds:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options
:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package,
e.g.
\usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
You can add sectcntreset to the class options, under
DocumentSettings. It will be passed on.
rh
Great
When using the sectioned bibliography option, LyX automatically adds:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package, e.g.
\usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
James
On 06/22/2011 05:40 PM, James C. Sutherland wrote:
When using the sectioned bibliography option, LyX automatically adds:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package, e.g.
\usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
You can add
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
**
On 06/22/2011 05:40 PM, James C. Sutherland wrote:
When using the sectioned bibliography option, LyX automatically adds:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options
:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package,
e.g.
\usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
You can add sectcntreset to the class options, under
DocumentSettings. It will be passed on.
rh
Great
When using the "sectioned bibliography" option, LyX automatically adds:
\usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
to the preamble.
Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package, e.g.
\usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
James
On 06/22/2011 05:40 PM, James C. Sutherland wrote:
> When using the "sectioned bibliography" option, LyX automatically adds:
> \usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
> to the preamble.
>
> Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package, e.g.
> \usepackag
;
> Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package, e.g.
> \usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
>
> You can add "sectcntreset" to the class options, under Document>Settings.
> It will be passed on.
>
> rh
>
> Great! I thought those wer
d bibliography" option, LyX automatically
>> adds:
>> \usepackage[dot]{bibtopic}
>> to the preamble.
>>
>> Is there a way to add additional options to the bibtopic package,
>> e.g.
>> \usepackage[dot,sectcntreset]{bibtopic}
It seems if I use elyxer for the purpose of export to 'word', only --html seems
to produce something word (2007) will recognize.
With defaults, word seems to show the xhtml structure instead of a formatted
document.
I also tried lyxHTML export to xhtml. This produced a file.xhtml, which
Hi Neal,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems if I use elyxer for the purpose of export to 'word', only --html
seems
to produce something word (2007) will recognize.
With defaults, word seems to show the xhtml structure instead of a formatted
It seems if I use elyxer for the purpose of export to 'word', only --html seems
to produce something word (2007) will recognize.
With defaults, word seems to show the xhtml structure instead of a formatted
document.
I also tried lyxHTML export to xhtml. This produced a file.xhtml, which
Hi Neal,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems if I use elyxer for the purpose of export to 'word', only --html
seems
to produce something word (2007) will recognize.
With defaults, word seems to show the xhtml structure instead of a formatted
It seems if I use elyxer for the purpose of export to 'word', only --html seems
to produce something word (2007) will recognize.
With defaults, word seems to show the xhtml structure instead of a formatted
document.
I also tried lyxHTML export to xhtml. This produced a file.xhtml, which
Hi Neal,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> It seems if I use elyxer for the purpose of export to 'word', only --html
> seems
> to produce something word (2007) will recognize.
>
> With defaults, word seems to show the xhtml structure instead of a
On 2011-03-23, Brian P Rabbit wrote:
Hi.
When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
LyX did not find your TeX installation when configuring.
Try ExtraReconfigure.
If this does not help, tell us more about
On 23/03/2011 1:48 PM, Brian P. Rabbit wrote:
Hi.
When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
Sincerely,
Some export options get hidden now. You can check if they are hidden or
simply missing entirely
On 2011-03-23, Brian P Rabbit wrote:
Hi.
When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
LyX did not find your TeX installation when configuring.
Try ExtraReconfigure.
If this does not help, tell us more about
On 23/03/2011 1:48 PM, Brian P. Rabbit wrote:
Hi.
When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
Sincerely,
Some export options get hidden now. You can check if they are hidden or
simply missing entirely
On 2011-03-23, Brian P Rabbit wrote:
> Hi.
> When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
> I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
> What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
LyX did not find your TeX installation when configuring.
Try Extra>Reconfigure.
If this does not hel
On 23/03/2011 1:48 PM, Brian P. Rabbit wrote:
Hi.
When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
Sincerely,
Some export options get hidden now. You can check if they are hidden or
simply missing entirely
Hi.
When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
Sincerely,
Hi.
When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
Sincerely,
Hi.
When I open LyX 2.00 rc1 (on a Mac 10.5),
I only see two options for output RTF and LyXHTML.
What happened to PDF, PS, and DVI?
Sincerely,
Hi all-
Both lyx v.1.6.4 and v.1.6.5 have the same problem: the table cell options
don't work correctly with graphics contents.
I put together a beamer presentation with several graphics per slide, so I used
the old HTML trick of ordering the images within a table. However, I found
101 - 200 of 660 matches
Mail list logo