Re: invisible file menu options

2003-01-29 Thread Nirmal Govind
menu (File, Edit, Help) intact. But the sub-options are invisible. E.g., when I click on File, I see a drop-down menu, but I don't see the entries on each line. They're still clickable though -- if I click on what seems to be line 2, I get another menu saying Select template file. I don't

Re: invisible file menu options

2003-01-29 Thread Nirmal Govind
ith toolbars and main > file menu (File, Edit, Help) intact. But the sub-options are > invisible. E.g., when I click on File, I see a drop-down menu, but I > don't see the entries on each line. They're still clickable though -- > if I click on what seems to be line 2, I get another m

invisible file menu options

2003-01-19 Thread Lavanya Vasudevan
Hello, I'm new to LyX, and recently installed 1.2.2 on my Windows XP laptop. When I run LyX (both from the command line, and by clicking on runlyx.bat), I do have a LyX window opening up, with toolbars and main file menu (File, Edit, Help) intact. But the sub-options are invisible. E.g., when

invisible file menu options

2003-01-19 Thread Lavanya Vasudevan
Hello, I'm new to LyX, and recently installed 1.2.2 on my Windows XP laptop. When I run LyX (both from the command line, and by clicking on runlyx.bat), I do have a LyX window opening up, with toolbars and main file menu (File, Edit, Help) intact. But the sub-options are invisible. E.g., when

invisible file menu options

2003-01-19 Thread Lavanya Vasudevan
Hello, I'm new to LyX, and recently installed 1.2.2 on my Windows XP laptop. When I run LyX (both from the command line, and by clicking on runlyx.bat), I do have a LyX window opening up, with toolbars and main file menu (File, Edit, Help) intact. But the sub-options are invisible. E.g., when

re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-30 Thread Matthieu Amiguet
Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I wrote quite a lot of little reports or

re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-30 Thread Matthieu Amiguet
Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I wrote quite a lot of little reports or

re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-30 Thread Matthieu Amiguet
> Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either > > 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable > between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently > from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I wrote quite a lot of little reports

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Christian Ridderström
I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm working with big documents consisting of several files. (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like in many other programs, to avoid the File menu becoming too large). I wouldn't like having it in a submenu, since I find

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Renaud MICHEL
Le Jeudi 29 Août 2002 11:36, Christian Ridderström a écrit : I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm working with big documents consisting of several files. Same here, I even would like to have more than 9 entries. (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like in

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm working with big documents consisting of several files. OK (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like in many other programs, to avoid the File

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Christian Ridderström
Now that I've heard about the UI-tip (thanks!), I think it sounds just fine having it in a submenu as the default setting. /Christian

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Peter
Hi, Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I like to have a long lastfiles list

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Les Denham
No problem with the default number of files shown being 9. (Sorry I can't quote John's question, I accidentally hit the delete key after reading it ..) -- L. R. Denham -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Christian Ridderström
I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm working with big documents consisting of several files. (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like in many other programs, to avoid the File menu becoming too large). I wouldn't like having it in a submenu, since I find

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Renaud MICHEL
Le Jeudi 29 Août 2002 11:36, Christian Ridderström a écrit : I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm working with big documents consisting of several files. Same here, I even would like to have more than 9 entries. (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like in

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm working with big documents consisting of several files. OK (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like in many other programs, to avoid the File

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Christian Ridderström
Now that I've heard about the UI-tip (thanks!), I think it sounds just fine having it in a submenu as the default setting. /Christian

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Peter
Hi, Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I like to have a long lastfiles list

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Les Denham
No problem with the default number of files shown being 9. (Sorry I can't quote John's question, I accidentally hit the delete key after reading it ..) -- L. R. Denham -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Christian Ridderström
I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm working with big documents consisting of several files. > (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like in many other programs, to > avoid the File menu becoming too large). I wouldn't like having it in a submenu, since I find

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Renaud MICHEL
Le Jeudi 29 Août 2002 11:36, Christian Ridderström a écrit : > I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm > working with big documents consisting of several files. Same here, I even would like to have more than 9 entries. > > (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > I prefer 9 files, and use it rather extensively. Especially when I'm > working with big documents consisting of several files. OK > > (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like in many other programs, to > > avoid the

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Christian Ridderström
Now that I've heard about the UI-tip (thanks!), I think it sounds just fine having it in a submenu as the default setting. /Christian

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Peter
Hi, > Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either > > 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable > between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently > from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I like to have a long lastfiles

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-29 Thread Les Denham
No problem with the default number of files shown being 9. (Sorry I can't quote John's question, I accidentally hit the delete key after reading it ..) -- L. R. Denham -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See

Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. 2. Auto region delete. Does anybody *disable*

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread Les Denham
1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. Have occasionally increased the number when switching between more than four files in different

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:44:42PM -0400, Les Denham wrote: Have occasionally increased the number when switching between more than four files in different directories. Not an important option. OK, so you would be OK with a default of, say, 9 ? (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:31:33PM +0100, John Levon wrote: 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I am not using that, Konni has it at 9 I

Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. 2. Auto region delete. Does anybody *disable*

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread Les Denham
1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. Have occasionally increased the number when switching between more than four files in different

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:44:42PM -0400, Les Denham wrote: Have occasionally increased the number when switching between more than four files in different directories. Not an important option. OK, so you would be OK with a default of, say, 9 ? (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:31:33PM +0100, John Levon wrote: 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I am not using that, Konni has it at 9 I

Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
Speak now, or forever hold your peace, if you use either 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently from the default, and if so, please tell me why. 2. "Auto region delete". Does anybody *disable*

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread Les Denham
> 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable > between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently > from the default, and if so, please tell me why. Have occasionally increased the number when switching between more than four files in different

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:44:42PM -0400, Les Denham wrote: > Have occasionally increased the number when switching between more than four > files in different directories. Not an important option. OK, so you would be OK with a default of, say, 9 ? (btw, I plan to move this to a submenu like

Re: Removing some prefs options (poll)

2002-08-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:31:33PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > 1. Lastfiles number of files shown. This is currently configurable > between 4 and 9. Does anybody actually have this configured differently > from the default, and if so, please tell me why. I am not using that, Konni has it at 9 I

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
I can import a ps file into the Gimp but...this is a genetics paper. There are conventions, plus there are my local lab conventions. Besides nice, neat columns containing data, I need horizontal lines to separate column titles and certain segments of data. I also need horizontal arrows

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: I have tried to create a table (will contain lines separating the title from the column headings and the headings from the data - 4 columns) using various erstwhile monospaced fonts (ugly courier, Lucida console, quicktype mono) in xfig,

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: Xfig is all wrong. First, the choice of monospaced fonts is tremendously limited (to courier or courier new, it seems). Next, you don't get a text field, you merely get individual lines of text units so if you wish to enter multiple lines of

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:59:03AM -0600, Praedor Tempus wrote: I had hoped that someone would be able to suggest an app that, perhaps, I am unaware of that does the graphics and text work properly and consistently...or that someone would know a trick other than Well, in this Try TGIF -

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Praedor
Part of my limitations have to do with the need to supply my tables and figures separately as eps files and partly due to my PI having some nit-picky requirements of his own. I will take a look at tgif. I have also been trying out a number of others. Thank you. On Friday 21 September 2001

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Larry Kollar
Praedor Tempus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that linux apps don't really understand what monospaced font means. What I don't understand is why you

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Christopher M. Jones
I take it your problem is the following: though you didn't see how to make your tables using the LyX facilities before, you perhaps now see that it is indeed possible. However, you still have the problem that you need the tables and figures in files separate from the main document. Perhaps

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
I can import a ps file into the Gimp but...this is a genetics paper. There are conventions, plus there are my local lab conventions. Besides nice, neat columns containing data, I need horizontal lines to separate column titles and certain segments of data. I also need horizontal arrows

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: I have tried to create a table (will contain lines separating the title from the column headings and the headings from the data - 4 columns) using various erstwhile monospaced fonts (ugly courier, Lucida console, quicktype mono) in xfig,

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: Xfig is all wrong. First, the choice of monospaced fonts is tremendously limited (to courier or courier new, it seems). Next, you don't get a text field, you merely get individual lines of text units so if you wish to enter multiple lines of

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:59:03AM -0600, Praedor Tempus wrote: I had hoped that someone would be able to suggest an app that, perhaps, I am unaware of that does the graphics and text work properly and consistently...or that someone would know a trick other than Well, in this Try TGIF -

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Praedor
Part of my limitations have to do with the need to supply my tables and figures separately as eps files and partly due to my PI having some nit-picky requirements of his own. I will take a look at tgif. I have also been trying out a number of others. Thank you. On Friday 21 September 2001

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Larry Kollar
Praedor Tempus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that linux apps don't really understand what monospaced font means. What I don't understand is why you

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Christopher M. Jones
I take it your problem is the following: though you didn't see how to make your tables using the LyX facilities before, you perhaps now see that it is indeed possible. However, you still have the problem that you need the tables and figures in files separate from the main document. Perhaps

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
> I can import a ps file into the Gimp but...this is a genetics paper. There > are conventions, plus there are my local lab conventions. Besides nice, neat > columns containing data, I need horizontal lines to separate column titles > and certain segments of data. I also need horizontal

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: > I have tried to create a table (will contain lines separating the title from > the column headings and the headings from the data - 4 columns) using various > erstwhile monospaced fonts (ugly courier, Lucida console, quicktype mono) in > xfig,

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: > Xfig is all wrong. First, the choice of monospaced fonts is tremendously > limited (to courier or courier new, it seems). Next, you don't get a text > field, you merely get individual lines of text units so if you wish to enter > multiple lines of

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:59:03AM -0600, Praedor Tempus wrote: > I had hoped that someone would be able to suggest an app that, perhaps, I am > unaware of that does the graphics and text work properly and > consistently...or that someone would know a trick other than "Well, in this Try TGIF

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Praedor
Part of my limitations have to do with the need to supply my tables and figures separately as eps files and partly due to my PI having some nit-picky requirements of his own. I will take a look at tgif. I have also been trying out a number of others. Thank you. On Friday 21 September 2001

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Larry Kollar
"Praedor Tempus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be > used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that > linux apps don't really understand what "monospaced font" means. What I don't understand is

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-21 Thread Christopher M. Jones
I take it your problem is the following: though you didn't see how to make your tables using the LyX facilities before, you perhaps now see that it is indeed possible. However, you still have the problem that you need the tables and figures in files separate from the main document. Perhaps

fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread francesco cattaneo
i've made a square 10cm x 10cm with jfig and then i've converted it into a eps file. but the conversion created 10cm x 10cm in a A4 page! so there is extra space that disturb me! i would like to save my square in a 10cm x 10cm EPS file and not in a A4 picture! there are options in fig2dev

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:08:27PM +0200, francesco cattaneo wrote: i've made a square 10cm x 10cm with jfig and then i've converted it into a eps file. but the conversion created 10cm x 10cm in a A4 page! so there is extra space that disturb me! Are you sure it's actually that size ? If

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread Herbert Voss
! there are options in fig2dev converter program that i and jfig don't know? I don't know what's going with fig2div, but I don't understand why you use jfig for only a square. it's much more easier with pure latex: \setlength\unitlength{1cm} \begin{center}\begin{picture}(10,10) \put(0,0){\framebox

Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that linux apps don't really understand what monospaced font means. I have tried to create a table (will contain lines separating the title from

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Herbert Voss
Praedor Tempus wrote: H17* R, C - T + H17 R U5 duplication + H168partial U5 duplication + H40 tRNA cellular sequence insertion + H72 U3, GAG - ACC

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Mike Ressler
Please remove lyx-users from your To: line as this complaint has little to do with LyX. On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that linux apps

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
Does anyone know of some obscure graphics/vector-drawing app that actually truly understands what monospaced fonts are and how they are dealt with? I do not really understand your complaint. Almost every texteditor uses monospaced fonts, and if you want it as .ps there is always a2ps (or your

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
The reason I posted this to the lyx list was that I know there are many who use lyx as the tool for producing publishable works. I am using lyx to write my journal articles as well as my thesis. I had thought/hoped someone in the list might provide suggestions on an app (not xfig - xfig

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
, using kspread to create the text portion worked acceptably BUT it didn't matter, I couldn't use it because the only output options other than straight printing to paper is to print to a ps file or a pdf file. I cannot, thus far, properly edit either filetype. I can import a ps file

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: I don't know what's going with fig2div, but I don't understand why you use jfig for only a square. it's much more easier with pure latex: \setlength\unitlength{1cm} \begin{center}\begin{picture}(10,10)

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Thomas Templin
On Tuesday, 18. September 2001 10:44, Praedor Tempus wrote: Four columns with entries like: H17* R, C - T+ H17 R U5 duplication + H168partial U5 duplication + H40 tRNA

fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread francesco cattaneo
i've made a square 10cm x 10cm with jfig and then i've converted it into a eps file. but the conversion created 10cm x 10cm in a A4 page! so there is extra space that disturb me! i would like to save my square in a 10cm x 10cm EPS file and not in a A4 picture! there are options in fig2dev

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:08:27PM +0200, francesco cattaneo wrote: i've made a square 10cm x 10cm with jfig and then i've converted it into a eps file. but the conversion created 10cm x 10cm in a A4 page! so there is extra space that disturb me! Are you sure it's actually that size ? If

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread Herbert Voss
! there are options in fig2dev converter program that i and jfig don't know? I don't know what's going with fig2div, but I don't understand why you use jfig for only a square. it's much more easier with pure latex: \setlength\unitlength{1cm} \begin{center}\begin{picture}(10,10) \put(0,0){\framebox

Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that linux apps don't really understand what monospaced font means. I have tried to create a table (will contain lines separating the title from

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Herbert Voss
Praedor Tempus wrote: H17* R, C - T + H17 R U5 duplication + H168partial U5 duplication + H40 tRNA cellular sequence insertion + H72 U3, GAG - ACC

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Mike Ressler
Please remove lyx-users from your To: line as this complaint has little to do with LyX. On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that linux apps

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
Does anyone know of some obscure graphics/vector-drawing app that actually truly understands what monospaced fonts are and how they are dealt with? I do not really understand your complaint. Almost every texteditor uses monospaced fonts, and if you want it as .ps there is always a2ps (or your

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
The reason I posted this to the lyx list was that I know there are many who use lyx as the tool for producing publishable works. I am using lyx to write my journal articles as well as my thesis. I had thought/hoped someone in the list might provide suggestions on an app (not xfig - xfig

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
, using kspread to create the text portion worked acceptably BUT it didn't matter, I couldn't use it because the only output options other than straight printing to paper is to print to a ps file or a pdf file. I cannot, thus far, properly edit either filetype. I can import a ps file

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: I don't know what's going with fig2div, but I don't understand why you use jfig for only a square. it's much more easier with pure latex: \setlength\unitlength{1cm} \begin{center}\begin{picture}(10,10)

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Thomas Templin
On Tuesday, 18. September 2001 10:44, Praedor Tempus wrote: Four columns with entries like: H17* R, C - T+ H17 R U5 duplication + H168partial U5 duplication + H40 tRNA

fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread francesco cattaneo
i've made a square 10cm x 10cm with jfig and then i've converted it into a eps file. but the conversion created 10cm x 10cm in a A4 page! so there is extra space that disturb me! i would like to save my square in a 10cm x 10cm EPS file and not in a A4 picture! there are options in fig2dev

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:08:27PM +0200, francesco cattaneo wrote: > i've made a square 10cm x 10cm with jfig and then i've converted it into a > eps file. but the conversion created 10cm x 10cm in a A4 page! so there is > extra space that disturb me! Are you sure it's actually that size ?

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread Herbert Voss
and not in a A4 > picture! there are options in fig2dev converter program that i and jfig > don't know? I don't know what's going with fig2div, but I don't understand why you use jfig for only a square. it's much more easier with pure latex: \setlength\unitlength{1cm} \begin{center}\begin{pic

Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that linux apps don't really understand what "monospaced font" means. I have tried to create a table (will contain lines separating the title from

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Herbert Voss
Praedor Tempus wrote: > > H17* R, C -> T + > H17 R & U5 duplication + > H168partial U5 duplication + > H40 tRNA & cellular sequence insertion + > H72 U3, GAG -> ACC

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Mike Ressler
Please remove lyx-users from your To: line as this complaint has little to do with LyX. On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Praedor Tempus wrote: > This is terribly disheartening. I haven't found a single app that can be > used to make a table for publication - the problem is that it appears that > linux

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Does anyone know of some obscure graphics/vector-drawing app that > actually truly understands what monospaced fonts are and how they > are dealt with? I do not really understand your complaint. Almost every texteditor uses monospaced fonts, and if you want it as .ps there is always a2ps (or

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
The reason I posted this to the lyx list was that I know there are many who use lyx as the tool for producing publishable works. I am using lyx to write my journal articles as well as my thesis. I had thought/hoped someone in the list might provide suggestions on an app (not xfig - xfig

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Praedor Tempus
, using kspread to create the text portion worked acceptably BUT it didn't matter, I couldn't use it because the only output options other than straight printing to paper is to print to a ps file or a pdf file. I cannot, thus far, properly edit either filetype. I can import a ps file

Re: fig2dev options...

2001-09-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > I don't know what's going with fig2div, but I don't understand > why you use jfig for only a square. it's much more easier with > pure latex: > > \setlength\unitlength{1cm} > \begin{center}\begin{picture}(10,10) >

Re: Are there NO options?

2001-09-20 Thread Thomas Templin
On Tuesday, 18. September 2001 10:44, Praedor Tempus wrote: > Four columns with entries like: > H17* R, C -> T+ > H17 R & U5 duplication + > H168partial U5 duplication + > H40

Re: Url Package Options

2001-06-28 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 11:30:19AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Good morning! How can I change the package options of url.sty? I tried to insert \usepackage[T1,hyphens]{url} in the preamble, but I get an error message [Options clash] because LyX automatically loads url.sty without

Re: Url Package Options

2001-06-28 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 11:30:19AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Good morning! > > How can I change the package options of url.sty? > I tried to insert \usepackage[T1,hyphens]{url} in the preamble, but I > get an error message ["Options clash"] because LyX autom

Url Package Options

2001-06-27 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Good morning! How can I change the package options of url.sty? I tried to insert \usepackage[T1,hyphens]{url} in the preamble, but I get an error message [Options clash] because LyX automatically loads url.sty without these options (if I insert an url-inset). Thanks, Jürgen P.S.: Please CC

Re: Url Package Options

2001-06-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: How can I change the package options of url.sty? I tried to insert \usepackage[T1,hyphens]{url} in the preamble, but I get an error message [Options clash] because LyX automatically loads url.sty without these options (if I insert an url-inset). try in preamble

Url Package Options

2001-06-27 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Good morning! How can I change the package options of url.sty? I tried to insert \usepackage[T1,hyphens]{url} in the preamble, but I get an error message [Options clash] because LyX automatically loads url.sty without these options (if I insert an url-inset). Thanks, Jürgen P.S.: Please CC

Re: Url Package Options

2001-06-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: How can I change the package options of url.sty? I tried to insert \usepackage[T1,hyphens]{url} in the preamble, but I get an error message [Options clash] because LyX automatically loads url.sty without these options (if I insert an url-inset). try in preamble

Url Package Options

2001-06-27 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Good morning! How can I change the package options of url.sty? I tried to insert \usepackage[T1,hyphens]{url} in the preamble, but I get an error message ["Options clash"] because LyX automatically loads url.sty without these options (if I insert an url-inset). Thanks, Jürgen P.S.:

Re: Url Package Options

2001-06-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > How can I change the package options of url.sty? > I tried to insert \usepackage[T1,hyphens]{url} in the preamble, but I > get an error message ["Options clash"] because LyX automatically loads > url.sty without these options (if I i

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >