Am 13.06.23 um 01:30 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
On 6/12/23 16:08, Herbert Voss wrote:
Am 12.06.23 um 21:49 schrieb Udicoudco:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss
wrote:
No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines
\mathbb
\mathbb isn't defined in amsmath,
On 6/12/23 16:08, Herbert Voss wrote:
Am 12.06.23 um 21:49 schrieb Udicoudco:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss
wrote:
No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines \mathbb
\mathbb isn't defined in amsmath, but in amsfonts, which should not
be used
with
Am 12.06.23 um 21:49 schrieb Udicoudco:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss wrote:
No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines \mathbb
\mathbb isn't defined in amsmath, but in amsfonts, which should not be used
with unicode-math (and as a consequence, neither
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:32 PM Herbert Voss wrote:
> No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which defines \mathbb
\mathbb isn't defined in amsmath, but in amsfonts, which should not be used
with unicode-math (and as a consequence, neither amssymb should be used
with unicode-math).
>
Am 12.06.23 um 18:46 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
On 6/12/23 07:59, Herbert Voss wrote:
With unicode-math, "$\mathbb{0}$" should be rendered as "ퟘ" (U+1D7D8),
with unicode-math it should be $\Bbbzero$
Sounds like a bug, then.
No, because unicode-math loads amsmath by default which
On 6/12/23 07:59, Herbert Voss wrote:
Am 12.06.23 um 13:47 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:28:50PM +0300, Udicoudco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak
wrote:
On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
It's because the 'blackboard' font is
Am 12.06.23 um 13:47 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:28:50PM +0300, Udicoudco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I
think).
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:28:50PM +0300, Udicoudco wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I
> > > > think). If you type
El lun, 12 jun 2023 a las 13:29, Udicoudco () escribió:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I
> > > > think). If you type
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > >
> > > It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I
> > > think). If you type characters not present in that font, you get weird
> > > results.
> > >
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:28:18AM +0200, Daniel wrote:
>
> On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > On 6/10/23 02:17, Daniel wrote:
> > > On 2023-06-10 05:54, Tom Goldring wrote:
> > > > If I put in the [\mathbb] "R" followed by _\aleph_0, the R and
> > > > the aleph show up
On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 6/10/23 02:17, Daniel wrote:
On 2023-06-10 05:54, Tom Goldring wrote:
If I put in the [\mathbb] "R" followed by _\aleph_0, the R and the
aleph show up correctly, but the zero (the subscript of the aleph)
shows up as a different character (I
On 6/10/23 02:17, Daniel wrote:
On 2023-06-10 05:54, Tom Goldring wrote:
If I put in the [\mathbb] "R" followed by _\aleph_0, the R and the
aleph show up correctly, but the zero (the subscript of the aleph)
shows up as a different character (I think it's the character that's
used in formal
Thanks Daniel, this was very helpful. I suppose that if I took the time
to slog through the LaTeX manual, the explanation would be in it somewhere.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: I don't understand this
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 07:01:29 +0200
From: Daniel
To: Tom
menu. In other
words, it's "R" with subscript "aleph null".
Here's the part I don't understand. If I put in the "R" followed by
_\aleph_0, the R and the aleph show up correctly, but the zero (the
subscript of the aleph) shows up as a different character (I t
t; with subscript "aleph null".
Here's the part I don't understand. If I put in the "R" followed by
_\aleph_0, the R and the aleph show up correctly, but the zero (the
subscript of the aleph) shows up as a different character (I think it's
the character that's used in formal
Thomas La Bone wrote:
Errors:
LaTeX Error: Command \texteuro unavailable in encoding T1.
The error message suggests that you have a Euro sign somewhere in your text
and that LaTeX does not know how to deal with it. However,
Description
\newblock Birkhä
user, 2002.
Your command was
Thomas La Bone wrote:
Errors:
LaTeX Error: Command \texteuro unavailable in encoding T1.
The error message suggests that you have a Euro sign somewhere in your text
and that LaTeX does not know how to deal with it. However,
Description
\newblock Birkhä
user, 2002.
Your command was
Thomas La Bone wrote:
> Errors:
>
> LaTeX Error: Command \texteuro unavailable in encoding T1.
The error message suggests that you have a Euro sign somewhere in your text
and that LaTeX does not know how to deal with it. However,
> Description
>
> \newblock Birkhä
> user, 2002.
> Your
I am using Lyx 1.6.4 on Windows XP to write my master's thesis. I have
been progressing nicely but today I went to generate a pdf of the
document and I got the following error and description:
Errors:
LaTeX Error: Command \texteuro unavailable in encoding T1.
Description
\newblock Birkhä
I am using Lyx 1.6.4 on Windows XP to write my master's thesis. I have
been progressing nicely but today I went to generate a pdf of the
document and I got the following error and description:
Errors:
LaTeX Error: Command \texteuro unavailable in encoding T1.
Description
\newblock Birkhä
I am using Lyx 1.6.4 on Windows XP to write my master's thesis. I have
been progressing nicely but today I went to generate a pdf of the
document and I got the following error and description:
Errors:
LaTeX Error: Command \texteuro unavailable in encoding T1.
Description
\newblock Birkhä
Steve,
I share your cynicism about Math education (and I am a Math professor!).
Personally I think it is a very understudied area as it is hard enough
getting competent High School Math teachers let alone taking a more
creative and productive approach. Good luck with your book.
I use a matrix
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to write an introductory algebra book to make algebra easy for
people with mental blocks. This will NOT be a traditional textbook. In my
personal opinion, the purpose of traditional textbooks is to make the subject
seem so complex as to require an
Steve,
I share your cynicism about Math education (and I am a Math professor!).
Personally I think it is a very understudied area as it is hard enough
getting competent High School Math teachers let alone taking a more
creative and productive approach. Good luck with your book.
I use a matrix
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to write an introductory algebra book to make algebra easy for
people with mental blocks. This will NOT be a traditional textbook. In my
personal opinion, the purpose of traditional textbooks is to make the subject
seem so complex as to require an
Steve,
I share your cynicism about Math education (and I am a Math professor!).
Personally I think it is a very understudied area as it is hard enough
getting competent High School Math teachers let alone taking a more
creative and productive approach. Good luck with your book.
I use a matrix
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to write an introductory algebra book to make algebra easy for
people with mental blocks. This will NOT be a traditional textbook. In my
personal opinion, the purpose of traditional textbooks is to make the subject
seem so complex as to require an
.
Christian pointed me in the right direction. There is one part I don't
understand about it. If I could use just a bit more of your patience:
Here is my problem. kbk.cls is a big, long confusing file and I don't
understand all the stuff in there! I'm looking at the Kluwer sample
document
.
Christian pointed me in the right direction. There is one part I don't
understand about it. If I could use just a bit more of your patience:
Here is my problem. kbk.cls is a big, long confusing file and I don't
understand all the stuff in there! I'm looking at the Kluwer sample
document
Kluwer company's kbk.cls with lyx.
Christian pointed me in the right direction. There is one part I don't
understand about it. If I could use just a bit more of your patience:
Here is my problem. kbk.cls is a big, long confusing file and I don't
understand all the stuff in there! I'm look
31 matches
Mail list logo
