Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-07 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? Under Windows, lines in the scripts files are delimited by CR/LF combinations. If I recall correctly, sed 3.02 chokes on the CR characters,

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-07 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? Under Windows, lines in the scripts files are delimited by CR/LF combinations. If I recall correctly, sed 3.02 chokes on the CR characters,

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-07 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? Under Windows, lines in the scripts files are delimited by CR/LF combinations. If I recall correctly, sed 3.02 chokes on the CR characters,

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruurd, Although there are still some minor issues with the math mode (offset of subscripts, accents etc. is to large and brackets are too tall), it is at least now rendered correctly and quite useable, so I'm able to

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? In what way worse? I had some problems with the new sed if I just drop it in \lyx\bin, see my previous post:

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruurd Reitsma wrote: At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? In what way worse? I had some problems with the new sed if I just

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruurd Reitsma wrote: I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, but the new one definately looks better. Many thanks for the new version. Math insets look better but the blue boxes are

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Anyway, I think it´s a nicer solution to include a newer ´MSYS´ sed. But I still don´t know why this is needed. Because with the current one (3.02) the creation of the file \lyx\share\lyx\docs\LaTeXConfig.lyx fails (0 length), so you can't view the LaTeX configuration from

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-06 Thread Uwe Sthr
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Again there?s a fix; I just uploaded a new package. Could you test it? Thanks for the new version. The math insets looks much better. But in comparison with LyXWin 1.3.3 the blue boxes are a bit smaller. I don't know what's the correct size but the fractions looks better in

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruurd, Although there are still some minor issues with the math mode (offset of subscripts, accents etc. is to large and brackets are too tall), it is at least now rendered correctly and quite useable, so I'm able to

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? In what way worse? I had some problems with the new sed if I just drop it in \lyx\bin, see my previous post:

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruurd Reitsma wrote: At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? In what way worse? I had some problems with the new sed if I just

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruurd Reitsma wrote: I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, but the new one definately looks better. Many thanks for the new version. Math insets look better but the blue boxes are

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Anyway, I think it´s a nicer solution to include a newer ´MSYS´ sed. But I still don´t know why this is needed. Because with the current one (3.02) the creation of the file \lyx\share\lyx\docs\LaTeXConfig.lyx fails (0 length), so you can't view the LaTeX configuration from

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-06 Thread Uwe Sthr
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Again there?s a fix; I just uploaded a new package. Could you test it? Thanks for the new version. The math insets looks much better. But in comparison with LyXWin 1.3.3 the blue boxes are a bit smaller. I don't know what's the correct size but the fractions looks better in

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
"Milos Komarcevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ruurd, > Although there are still some minor issues with the math mode (offset of > subscripts, accents etc. is to large and brackets are too tall), it is > at least now rendered correctly and quite useable, so I'm

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? In what way worse? I had some problems with the new sed if I just drop it in \lyx\bin, see my previous post:

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
"Milos Komarcevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ruurd Reitsma wrote: > > At this very moment, not yet. Actually, the new sed makes things worse for > > me. What exactly is the new version supposed to do? > > In what way worse? I had some problems with the new sed

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-06 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
"Uwe Stöhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ruurd Reitsma wrote: > > > I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, > > but the new one definately looks better. > > Many thanks for the new version. Math insets look better but the blue

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-06 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Anyway, I think it´s a nicer solution to include a newer ´MSYS´ sed. But I still don´t know why this is needed. Because with the current one (3.02) the creation of the file \lyx\share\lyx\docs\LaTeXConfig.lyx fails (0 length), so you can't view the LaTeX configuration from

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-06 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Again there?s a fix; I just uploaded a new package. Could you test it? Thanks for the new version. The math insets looks much better. But in comparison with LyXWin 1.3.3 the blue boxes are a bit smaller. I don't know what's the correct size but the fractions looks better in

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Uwe Stöhr wrote: many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. except of the mentioned bug: - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too big, see the two attached screenshots. Due to the too small and too high boxes, all math insets looks ugly -

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Rob S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Over the next few days I'll amend the Wiki page to reflect the update. It already looks as if much of the wiki page can be thinned out. FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and fixed the path thing in configure.bat. Ruurd

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Rob S
Hi Ruurd; I see Uwe has already updated the wiki page to reflect your 1.3.5 version including the configure.bat update. Also, 1.3.5 incorporates an updated configure which now picks up Windoze versions of Acrobat and Ghostview (AcroRd32.exe and Gsview32.exe) if installed. Your mention of the

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! I do have some problems with it though, maybe someone on the list could confirm them and provide some help. Your mention of the inclusion of a newer version of Sed.exe has also addressed another of my questions. FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file is still

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Eugenio Guevara
- Original Message - From: Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:38 AM Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! I do have some problems with it though, maybe someone

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Rob S
Milos Komarcevic wrote: - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file is still 0 bytes. Is there a newer package? Can someone confirm this? Yep, that's my conclusion (still

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Rob S wrote: - The convertDefault.sh script doesn't work again, it always fails when testing for converted file existance. I had to comment those lines out in order to get the figures to display in LyX I notice that .pdf images fail to convert/display in LyX - perhaps this is also the problem.

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Michael Schmitt
Dear Uwe, - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too big, see the two attached screenshots. It is all more or less related to the same problem. Once we have fixed the font metrics, math formula should look much better. I hope this is easy to fix, because it is very

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Milos Komarcevic wrote: - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file is still 0 bytes. Is there a newer package? Can someone confirm this? Yes I can confirm this. It is the old

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! I do have some problems with it though, maybe someone on the list could confirm them and provide some help. Your mention of the inclusion of a newer version of Sed.exe has also addressed another

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd, - The display of fonts in math mode with Qt 3.2.1 non-commerical is much worse than with 2.3.0, but I guess someone already mentioned this. I hope it can be fixed somehow because it's very annoying. I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, but the new

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Uwe Sthr
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, but the new one definately looks better. Many thanks for the new version. Math insets look better but the blue boxes are too high now, which affects sub/suberscripts, braces etc. Attached a new

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and fixed the path thing in configure.bat. Ruurd Ruurd, First, thanks much for continuing to port LyX to Windows. I downloaded the port from your web site yesterday (4 January). The copy I got has the old sed (3.02) in it. When did you

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Eugenio Guevara wrote: I had the same problem with Sed.exe. Downloading the newest version and making the substitution doesn't solve the problem. Besides not having a LatexConfig.lyx file complete, Lyx functions properly and finds everything installed. Strange, getting rid of the old sed and

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Eugenio Guevara
I'm using sed.exe version 4.1.2. - Original Message - From: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 2:38 PM Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released Eugenio Guevara wrote: I had the same problem with Sed.exe. Downloading

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Uwe Stöhr wrote: many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. except of the mentioned bug: - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too big, see the two attached screenshots. Due to the too small and too high boxes, all math insets looks ugly -

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Rob S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Over the next few days I'll amend the Wiki page to reflect the update. It already looks as if much of the wiki page can be thinned out. FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and fixed the path thing in configure.bat. Ruurd

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Rob S
Hi Ruurd; I see Uwe has already updated the wiki page to reflect your 1.3.5 version including the configure.bat update. Also, 1.3.5 incorporates an updated configure which now picks up Windoze versions of Acrobat and Ghostview (AcroRd32.exe and Gsview32.exe) if installed. Your mention of the

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! I do have some problems with it though, maybe someone on the list could confirm them and provide some help. Your mention of the inclusion of a newer version of Sed.exe has also addressed another of my questions. FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file is still

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Eugenio Guevara
- Original Message - From: Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:38 AM Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! I do have some problems with it though, maybe someone

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Rob S
Milos Komarcevic wrote: - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file is still 0 bytes. Is there a newer package? Can someone confirm this? Yep, that's my conclusion (still

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Rob S wrote: - The convertDefault.sh script doesn't work again, it always fails when testing for converted file existance. I had to comment those lines out in order to get the figures to display in LyX I notice that .pdf images fail to convert/display in LyX - perhaps this is also the problem.

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Michael Schmitt
Dear Uwe, - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too big, see the two attached screenshots. It is all more or less related to the same problem. Once we have fixed the font metrics, math formula should look much better. I hope this is easy to fix, because it is very

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Milos Komarcevic wrote: - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file is still 0 bytes. Is there a newer package? Can someone confirm this? Yes I can confirm this. It is the old

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Milos Komarcevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! I do have some problems with it though, maybe someone on the list could confirm them and provide some help. Your mention of the inclusion of a newer version of Sed.exe has also addressed another

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd, - The display of fonts in math mode with Qt 3.2.1 non-commerical is much worse than with 2.3.0, but I guess someone already mentioned this. I hope it can be fixed somehow because it's very annoying. I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, but the new

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Uwe Sthr
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, but the new one definately looks better. Many thanks for the new version. Math insets look better but the blue boxes are too high now, which affects sub/suberscripts, braces etc. Attached a new

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and fixed the path thing in configure.bat. Ruurd Ruurd, First, thanks much for continuing to port LyX to Windows. I downloaded the port from your web site yesterday (4 January). The copy I got has the old sed (3.02) in it. When did you

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Eugenio Guevara wrote: I had the same problem with Sed.exe. Downloading the newest version and making the substitution doesn't solve the problem. Besides not having a LatexConfig.lyx file complete, Lyx functions properly and finds everything installed. Strange, getting rid of the old sed and

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Eugenio Guevara
I'm using sed.exe version 4.1.2. - Original Message - From: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 2:38 PM Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released Eugenio Guevara wrote: I had the same problem with Sed.exe. Downloading

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. > > except of the mentioned bug: > > > - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too > > big, see the two attached screenshots. > > Due to the too small and too high boxes, all math insets

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
"Rob S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Over the next few days I'll amend the Wiki page to reflect the update. > It already looks as if much of the wiki page can be thinned out. > FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and fixed the path thing in configure.bat. Ruurd

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Rob S
Hi Ruurd; I see Uwe has already updated the wiki page to reflect your 1.3.5 version including the configure.bat update. Also, 1.3.5 incorporates an updated "configure" which now picks up Windoze versions of Acrobat and Ghostview (AcroRd32.exe and Gsview32.exe) if installed. Your mention of

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! I do have some problems with it though, maybe someone on the list could confirm them and provide some help. Your mention of the inclusion of a newer version of Sed.exe has also addressed another of my questions. > FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
"Milos Komarcevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! > - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe > It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with > 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Eugenio Guevara
- Original Message - From: "Milos Komarcevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:38 AM Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released > Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! > > I do have some problem

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Rob S
Milos Komarcevic wrote: - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file is still 0 bytes. Is there a newer package? Can someone confirm this? Yep, that's my conclusion (still

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Rob S wrote: - The convertDefault.sh script doesn't work again, it always fails when testing for converted file existance. I had to comment those lines out in order to get the figures to display in LyX I notice that .pdf images fail to convert/display in LyX - perhaps this is also the problem.

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Michael Schmitt
Dear Uwe, > - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too > big, see the two attached screenshots. It is all more or less related to the same problem. Once we have fixed the font metrics, math formula should look much better. I hope this is easy to fix, because it is very

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Milos Komarcevic wrote: - I couldn't see this new sed version in lyx-1.3.5-win32-nc.exe It seems to be the old one, identical to the one packaged with 1.3.3, so my LaTeX configuration file is still 0 bytes. Is there a newer package? Can someone confirm this? Yes I can confirm this. It is the old

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Enrico Forestieri
Milos Komarcevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ruurd, thanks a lot for the updated version! > > I do have some problems with it though, maybe someone on the > list could confirm them and provide some help. > > > Your mention of the inclusion of a newer version of Sed.exe has also > >

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Milos Komarcevic
Ruurd, - The display of fonts in math mode with Qt 3.2.1 non-commerical is much worse than with 2.3.0, but I guess someone already mentioned this. I hope it can be fixed somehow because it's very annoying. I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, but the new

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: I have uploaded a fixed package to sourceforge. There might still be issues, but the new one definately looks better. Many thanks for the new version. Math insets look better but the blue boxes are too high now, which affects sub/suberscripts, braces etc. Attached a new

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ruurd Reitsma wrote: FYI, I did include the new sed.exe and fixed the path thing in configure.bat. Ruurd Ruurd, First, thanks much for continuing to port LyX to Windows. I downloaded the port from your web site yesterday (4 January). The copy I got has the old sed (3.02) in it. When did you

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Eugenio Guevara wrote: I had the same problem with Sed.exe. Downloading the newest version and making the substitution doesn't solve the problem. Besides not having a LatexConfig.lyx file complete, Lyx functions properly and finds everything installed. Strange, getting rid of the old sed and

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-05 Thread Eugenio Guevara
I'm using sed.exe version 4.1.2. - Original Message - From: "Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 2:38 PM Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released > Eugenio Guevara wrote: > > > >

LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX for Win32. It can be found at the usual spot: http://www.home.zonnet.nl/rareitsma/lyx/ The Qt version is now 3.2.1 Non-Commercial. Please note that: * The spell checking stuff has changed. * There are some visual improvements due to the new Qt

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Rob S
Ruurd; Many, many thanks - just downloaded it and now about to have a play! Over the next few days I'll amend the Wiki page to reflect the update. It already looks as if much of the wiki page can be thinned out. Regards Rob S Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Uwe Sthr
Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX for Win32. Ruurd, many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. After testing the version, I updated the wiki site about LyXWin's setup http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/WindowsSetup and have the following annotations: - It is still not

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-04 Thread Uwe Sthr
many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. except of the mentioned bug: - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too big, see the two attached screenshots. Due to the too small and too high boxes, all math insets looks ugly - underlines and fraction lines

LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX for Win32. It can be found at the usual spot: http://www.home.zonnet.nl/rareitsma/lyx/ The Qt version is now 3.2.1 Non-Commercial. Please note that: * The spell checking stuff has changed. * There are some visual improvements due to the new Qt

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Rob S
Ruurd; Many, many thanks - just downloaded it and now about to have a play! Over the next few days I'll amend the Wiki page to reflect the update. It already looks as if much of the wiki page can be thinned out. Regards Rob S Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Uwe Sthr
Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX for Win32. Ruurd, many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. After testing the version, I updated the wiki site about LyXWin's setup http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/WindowsSetup and have the following annotations: - It is still not

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-04 Thread Uwe Sthr
many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. except of the mentioned bug: - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too big, see the two attached screenshots. Due to the too small and too high boxes, all math insets looks ugly - underlines and fraction lines

LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Ruurd Reitsma
Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX for Win32. It can be found at the usual spot: http://www.home.zonnet.nl/rareitsma/lyx/ The Qt version is now 3.2.1 Non-Commercial. Please note that: * The spell checking stuff has changed. * There are some visual improvements due to the new Qt

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Rob S
Ruurd; Many, many thanks - just downloaded it and now about to have a "play"! Over the next few days I'll amend the Wiki page to reflect the update. It already looks as if much of the wiki page can be thinned out. Regards Rob S Ruurd Reitsma wrote: Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released

2005-01-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Finally, I came around to compiling a fresh LyX for Win32. Ruurd, many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. After testing the version, I updated the wiki site about LyXWin's setup http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/WindowsSetup and have the following annotations: - It is still not

Re: LyX 1.3.5 for Win32 released - a nasty bug

2005-01-04 Thread Uwe Stöhr
many many thanks for this new version. It works very well. except of the mentioned bug: > - The blue boxes in the math insets are too small and the cursor too > big, see the two attached screenshots. Due to the too small and too high boxes, all math insets looks ugly - underlines and fraction