I have some general questions about using LyX for a somewhat different
type of publication than it is currently built for.
(As an aside, kudos to whoever coded the nested equation editing stuff. WOW.)
I'm curious if anyone else is trying to do this with LyX: I work at
the Wisconsin Legislature,
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a cross reference to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say As defined in s. 10.91 without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not at present, though this
Richard Heck schreef:
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a cross reference to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say As defined in s. 10.91 without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not at
Richard Heck wrote:
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a cross reference to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say As defined in s. 10.91 without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not
Thanks to the list denizens for being incredibly helpful on this
thread, already, within the space of a single day. You folks rock, and
you obviously have a fierce love of your project!
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Charles de Miramon
cmira...@kde-france.org wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Dan
That has been some interesting insight at the workings of modern
legislature:)
I have some general questions about using LyX for a somewhat different
type of publication than it is currently built for.
(As an aside, kudos to whoever coded the nested equation editing stuff. WOW.)
I'm curious if anyone else is trying to do this with LyX: I work at
the Wisconsin Legislature,
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a cross reference to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say As defined in s. 10.91 without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not at present, though this
Richard Heck schreef:
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a cross reference to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say As defined in s. 10.91 without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not at
Richard Heck wrote:
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a cross reference to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say As defined in s. 10.91 without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not
Thanks to the list denizens for being incredibly helpful on this
thread, already, within the space of a single day. You folks rock, and
you obviously have a fierce love of your project!
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Charles de Miramon
cmira...@kde-france.org wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Dan
That has been some interesting insight at the workings of modern
legislature:)
I have some general questions about using LyX for a somewhat different
type of publication than it is currently built for.
(As an aside, kudos to whoever coded the nested equation editing stuff. WOW.)
I'm curious if anyone else is trying to do this with LyX: I work at
the Wisconsin Legislature,
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a "cross reference" to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say "As defined in s. 10.91" without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not at present, though
Richard Heck schreef:
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a "cross reference" to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say "As defined in s. 10.91" without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Richard Heck wrote:
> Dan Fitch wrote:
>> 1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
>> make a "cross reference" to a section or subsection, without adding a
>> label? So the user might say "As defined in s. 10.91" without having
>> to go to section 10.91 and adding a
Thanks to the list denizens for being incredibly helpful on this
thread, already, within the space of a single day. You folks rock, and
you obviously have a fierce love of your project!
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Charles de Miramon
wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>
>>
That has been some interesting insight at the workings of modern
legislature:)
18 matches
Mail list logo