I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a couple
of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water quality
workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
distinctly different from those of the former, and I'm considering how
Rich Shepard wrote:
I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a
couple
of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water
quality
workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
distinctly different from those of the former,
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
My first reaction comes from a database theory perspective: avoid
redundant entries (same entry in two or more files). If you edit one and
not the others, things will get out of synch.
Paul,
I'm quite familiar with that after building database
Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a couple
of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water quality
workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
distinctly different
Look Tellico.
--
http://www.kde-france.org
I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a couple
of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water quality
workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
distinctly different from those of the former, and I'm considering how
Rich Shepard wrote:
I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a
couple
of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water
quality
workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
distinctly different from those of the former,
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
My first reaction comes from a database theory perspective: avoid
redundant entries (same entry in two or more files). If you edit one and
not the others, things will get out of synch.
Paul,
I'm quite familiar with that after building database
Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a couple
of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water quality
workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
distinctly different
Look Tellico.
--
http://www.kde-france.org
I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a couple
of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water quality
workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
distinctly different from those of the former, and I'm considering how
Rich Shepard wrote:
I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a
couple
of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water
quality
workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
distinctly different from those of the former,
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
My first reaction comes from a "database theory" perspective: avoid
redundant entries (same entry in two or more files). If you edit one and
not the others, things will get out of synch.
Paul,
I'm quite familiar with that after building database
Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>I used natbib to manage the citations for my book. I'm now writing a couple
> of monographs that will be part of the take-home package from a water quality
> workshop in which I'll be lecturing. The references for the latter are
> distinctly
Look Tellico.
--
http://www.kde-france.org
15 matches
Mail list logo
