It's the Win32 version running on XP SP3. Is it somehow possible to see
the contents of the PATH variable while LyX is running (e.g. by
executing additional commands like 'echo $PATH') in the debug console?
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Ralf Glaser, track IT
ralf.gla...@trackitsystems.de wrote:
It's the Win32 version running on XP SP3. Is it somehow possible to see the
contents of the PATH variable while LyX is running (e.g. by executing
additional commands like 'echo $PATH') in the debug
It's the Win32 version running on XP SP3. Is it somehow possible to see
the contents of the PATH variable while LyX is running (e.g. by
executing additional commands like 'echo $PATH') in the debug console?
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Ralf Glaser, track IT
ralf.gla...@trackitsystems.de wrote:
It's the Win32 version running on XP SP3. Is it somehow possible to see the
contents of the PATH variable while LyX is running (e.g. by executing
additional commands like 'echo $PATH') in the debug
It's the Win32 version running on XP SP3. Is it somehow possible to see
the contents of the PATH variable while LyX is running (e.g. by
executing additional commands like 'echo $PATH') in the debug console?
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Ralf Glaser, track IT
wrote:
> It's the Win32 version running on XP SP3. Is it somehow possible to see the
> contents of the PATH variable while LyX is running (e.g. by executing
> additional commands like 'echo $PATH') in the debug
12/02/2014 10:25, Ralf Glaser, track IT:
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX
works fine now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version being no longer
accessible as LyX's python is being used now.
It's a workaround but i'd really like to make LyX add
12/02/2014 10:25, Ralf Glaser, track IT:
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX
works fine now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version being no longer
accessible as LyX's python is being used now.
It's a workaround but i'd really like to make LyX add
12/02/2014 10:25, Ralf Glaser, track IT:
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX
works fine now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version being no longer
accessible as LyX's python is being used now.
It's a workaround but i'd really like to make LyX add
I did. Had no influence.
Am 12.02.2014 23:57, schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 12.02.2014 um 10:25 schrieb Ralf Glaser, track IT
ralf.gla...@trackitsystems.de:
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works fine
now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version
I did. Had no influence.
Am 12.02.2014 23:57, schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 12.02.2014 um 10:25 schrieb Ralf Glaser, track IT
ralf.gla...@trackitsystems.de:
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works fine
now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version
I did. Had no influence.
Am 12.02.2014 23:57, schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 12.02.2014 um 10:25 schrieb "Ralf Glaser, track IT"
:
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works fine
now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works fine
now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version beeing no longer
accessible as LyX's python is beeing used now.
It's a workaround but i'd really like to make LyX add it's PATH prefix as
intended.
I
Am 12.02.2014 um 10:25 schrieb Ralf Glaser, track IT
ralf.gla...@trackitsystems.de:
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works
fine now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version beeing no longer
accessible as LyX's python is beeing used now.
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works fine
now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version beeing no longer
accessible as LyX's python is beeing used now.
It's a workaround but i'd really like to make LyX add it's PATH prefix as
intended.
I
Am 12.02.2014 um 10:25 schrieb Ralf Glaser, track IT
ralf.gla...@trackitsystems.de:
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works
fine now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version beeing no longer
accessible as LyX's python is beeing used now.
I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works fine
now.
Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version beeing no longer
accessible as LyX's python is beeing used now.
It's a workaround but i'd really like to make LyX add it's PATH prefix as
intended.
I
Am 12.02.2014 um 10:25 schrieb "Ralf Glaser, track IT"
:
> I tested adding the LyX PATH extension to the PATH variable and LyX works
> fine now.
> Unfortunately this results in cygwins's python version beeing no longer
> accessible as LyX's python is beeing used
Starting LyX from a terminal window didn't produce any output.
The View-Messages output is is also kind of boring:
09:52:23.790: (dialog-toggle progress)
09:52:44.725: Öffne Dokument C:\tmp\lyx\newfile1.lyx...Error:
Dokumentformat-Fehler
My bad, didn't notice the option to enable verbose output. Seems like
you are right and it's a python problem or more precise a problem with
LyX calling Cygwin's Python (2.7.3) instead of LyX's own Python (2.7.5).
When i run the command in a terminal window using c:\Programme\Lyx
I ran into a similar problem in the past and cured it by editing the Windows
command path to move Cygwin after LyX.
Paul
Starting LyX from a terminal window didn't produce any output.
The View-Messages output is is also kind of boring:
09:52:23.790: (dialog-toggle progress)
09:52:44.725: Öffne Dokument C:\tmp\lyx\newfile1.lyx...Error:
Dokumentformat-Fehler
My bad, didn't notice the option to enable verbose output. Seems like
you are right and it's a python problem or more precise a problem with
LyX calling Cygwin's Python (2.7.3) instead of LyX's own Python (2.7.5).
When i run the command in a terminal window using c:\Programme\Lyx
I ran into a similar problem in the past and cured it by editing the Windows
command path to move Cygwin after LyX.
Paul
Starting LyX from a terminal window didn't produce any output.
The View->Messages output is is also kind of boring:
09:52:23.790: (dialog-toggle progress)
09:52:44.725: Öffne Dokument C:\tmp\lyx\newfile1.lyx...Error:
Dokumentformat-Fehler
My bad, didn't notice the option to enable verbose output. Seems like
you are right and it's a python problem or more precise a problem with
LyX calling Cygwin's Python (2.7.3) instead of LyX's own Python (2.7.5).
When i run the command in a terminal window using c:\Programme\Lyx
I ran into a similar problem in the past and cured it by editing the Windows
command path to move Cygwin after LyX.
Paul
Ralf Glaser, track IT wrote:
Hello,
please find attached the Lyx 1.6 file which Lyx 2.0 won't open.
Thanks. It opens just fine here. I suppose lyx2lyx (the converter between
different LyX formats) does not work properly on your side. Maybe a Python
problem.
Can you open LyX from a terminal
Ralf Glaser, track IT wrote:
Hello,
please find attached the Lyx 1.6 file which Lyx 2.0 won't open.
Thanks. It opens just fine here. I suppose lyx2lyx (the converter between
different LyX formats) does not work properly on your side. Maybe a Python
problem.
Can you open LyX from a terminal
Ralf Glaser, track IT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please find attached the Lyx 1.6 file which Lyx 2.0 won't open.
Thanks. It opens just fine here. I suppose lyx2lyx (the converter between
different LyX formats) does not work properly on your side. Maybe a Python
problem.
Can you open LyX from a
Ralf Glaser, track IT wrote:
I'm running Lyx on a Windows XP system and tried to upgrade from 1.6.7
to 2.0.
Unfortunately Lyx failes to open 1.6 files with the following message:
“\Buffer_convertLyxFormat.h is not a readable LyX document”
I tried upgrading to 1.6.9 before moving on to
Ralf Glaser, track IT wrote:
I'm running Lyx on a Windows XP system and tried to upgrade from 1.6.7
to 2.0.
Unfortunately Lyx failes to open 1.6 files with the following message:
“\Buffer_convertLyxFormat.h is not a readable LyX document”
I tried upgrading to 1.6.9 before moving on to
Ralf Glaser, track IT wrote:
> I'm running Lyx on a Windows XP system and tried to upgrade from 1.6.7
> to 2.0.
> Unfortunately Lyx failes to open 1.6 files with the following message:
> “\Buffer_convertLyxFormat.h is not a readable LyX document”
>
> I tried upgrading to 1.6.9 before moving
Le 9 janvier 2012 à 12:16 -0800 Guenter Milde écrivait :
For a start, make sure that the netbook has ImageMagick and
Ghostscript. If your images are PDF (or maybe EPS), I think they will
need conversion for DVI output but not for PDF output.
PDF, PNG, and JPG need conversion for DVI, PS
Le 9 janvier 2012 à 12:16 -0800 Guenter Milde écrivait :
For a start, make sure that the netbook has ImageMagick and
Ghostscript. If your images are PDF (or maybe EPS), I think they will
need conversion for DVI output but not for PDF output.
PDF, PNG, and JPG need conversion for DVI, PS
Le 9 janvier 2012 à 12:16 -0800 Guenter Milde écrivait :
>> For a start, make sure that the netbook has ImageMagick and
>> Ghostscript. If your images are PDF (or maybe EPS), I think they will
>> need conversion for DVI output but not for PDF output.
> PDF, PNG, and JPG need conversion for DVI,
On 2012-01-07, Paul A Rubin wrote:
Raymond Ouellette ray.ouellette at sympatico.ca writes:
I can now preview images in the DVI output as I allways did. Strangely
I do have the same packages installed (well, I guess) on my netbook
(Bodhi Linux 32 bits) and there are no images in the DVI
On 2012-01-07, Paul A Rubin wrote:
Raymond Ouellette ray.ouellette at sympatico.ca writes:
I can now preview images in the DVI output as I allways did. Strangely
I do have the same packages installed (well, I guess) on my netbook
(Bodhi Linux 32 bits) and there are no images in the DVI
On 2012-01-07, Paul A Rubin wrote:
> Raymond Ouellette sympatico.ca> writes:
>> I can now preview images in the DVI output as I allways did. Strangely
>> I do have the same packages installed (well, I guess) on my netbook
>> (Bodhi Linux 32 bits) and there are no images in the DVI output, only
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2011 23:08:49 +
José Matos jama...@lyx.org écrivait :
On 12/21/2011 04:02 AM, Raymond Ouellette wrote:
How can I find what is missing to get back the graphics in DVI
output? I prefer to preview using DVI, it's faster...
I think it the usual behaviour for dvi not
Raymond Ouellette ray.ouellette at sympatico.ca writes:
I can now preview images in the DVI output as I allways did. Strangely
I do have the same packages installed (well, I guess) on my netbook
(Bodhi Linux 32 bits) and there are no images in the DVI output, only
empty rectangles. Images
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2011 23:08:49 +
José Matos jama...@lyx.org écrivait :
On 12/21/2011 04:02 AM, Raymond Ouellette wrote:
How can I find what is missing to get back the graphics in DVI
output? I prefer to preview using DVI, it's faster...
I think it the usual behaviour for dvi not
Raymond Ouellette ray.ouellette at sympatico.ca writes:
I can now preview images in the DVI output as I allways did. Strangely
I do have the same packages installed (well, I guess) on my netbook
(Bodhi Linux 32 bits) and there are no images in the DVI output, only
empty rectangles. Images
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2011 23:08:49 +
José Matos écrivait :
> On 12/21/2011 04:02 AM, Raymond Ouellette wrote:
> > How can I find what is missing to get back the graphics in DVI
> > output? I prefer to preview using DVI, it's faster...
> I think it the usual behaviour for
Raymond Ouellette sympatico.ca> writes:
>
> I can now preview images in the DVI output as I allways did. Strangely
> I do have the same packages installed (well, I guess) on my netbook
> (Bodhi Linux 32 bits) and there are no images in the DVI output, only
> empty rectangles. Images are
On 12/01/2011 06:32 PM, Frederick FN Noronha फ्रेडरिक नोरोन्या *فريدريك
نورونيا wrote:
Could someone pls give me a tip of how I could convert a Lyx 2.0 file
to read in Lyx 1.67?
Lyx2Lyx isn't working for me.
Is it giving an error? If so, that is a bug.
If I send across the file, could you
On 12/01/2011 06:32 PM, Frederick FN Noronha फ्रेडरिक नोरोन्या *فريدريك
نورونيا wrote:
Could someone pls give me a tip of how I could convert a Lyx 2.0 file
to read in Lyx 1.67?
Lyx2Lyx isn't working for me.
Is it giving an error? If so, that is a bug.
If I send across the file, could you
On 12/01/2011 06:32 PM, Frederick FN Noronha फ्रेडरिक नोरोन्या *فريدريك
نورونيا wrote:
> Could someone pls give me a tip of how I could convert a Lyx 2.0 file
> to read in Lyx 1.67?
>
> Lyx2Lyx isn't working for me.
>
Is it giving an error? If so, that is a bug.
> If I send across the file,
Guenter Milde wrote:
If not, please remove the
[babelshorthands=true] option from the LyX generated output.
Alas, this is a file format change.
Jürgen
Guenter Milde wrote:
If not, please remove the
[babelshorthands=true] option from the LyX generated output.
Alas, this is a file format change.
Jürgen
Guenter Milde wrote:
> If not, please remove the
> [babelshorthands=true] option from the LyX generated output.
Alas, this is a file format change.
Jürgen
On 2011-10-03, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Tao Cumplido wrote:
when I select 'use non-Tex fonts' and select German to be my document
language I get an error message.
It's a bug in polyglossia.
Indeed. However a different one, so that
Entering
\usepackage{xkeyval}
does not help. (
In
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
In Debian/Ubuntu, polyglossia is at version 2009/01/25 v1.0.2
and has a bug described e.g. in
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/tMRBZCv1fz60QnWYVKfO
fortunately this particular problem is easy to fix: you have just to
put braces
On 2011-10-03, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Tao Cumplido wrote:
when I select 'use non-Tex fonts' and select German to be my document
language I get an error message.
It's a bug in polyglossia.
Indeed. However a different one, so that
Entering
\usepackage{xkeyval}
does not help. (
In
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
In Debian/Ubuntu, polyglossia is at version 2009/01/25 v1.0.2
and has a bug described e.g. in
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/tMRBZCv1fz60QnWYVKfO
fortunately this particular problem is easy to fix: you have just to
put braces
On 2011-10-03, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Tao Cumplido wrote:
>> when I select 'use non-Tex fonts' and select German to be my document
>> language I get an error message.
> It's a bug in polyglossia.
Indeed. However a different one, so that
> Entering
> \usepackage{xkeyval}
does not help. (
Guenter Milde users.berlios.de> writes:
>
> In Debian/Ubuntu, polyglossia is at version 2009/01/25 v1.0.2
> and has a bug described e.g. in
> http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/tMRBZCv1fz60QnWYVKfO
>
> fortunately this particular problem is easy to fix: you have just to
> put braces
Tao Cumplido wrote:
when I select 'use non-Tex fonts' and select German to be my document
language I get an error message.
It's a bug in polyglossia.
Entering
\usepackage{xkeyval}
In Document Settings Preamble should fix the problem.
HTH,
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes:
\usepackage{xkeyval}
In Document Settings Preamble should fix the problem.
Thanks, I tried this but unfortunately I still get the same error.
Regards,
Tao
Tao Cumplido wrote:
Thanks, I tried this but unfortunately I still get the same error.
Have you tried with different fonts?
Jürgen
Tao Cumplido wrote:
when I select 'use non-Tex fonts' and select German to be my document
language I get an error message.
It's a bug in polyglossia.
Entering
\usepackage{xkeyval}
In Document Settings Preamble should fix the problem.
HTH,
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes:
\usepackage{xkeyval}
In Document Settings Preamble should fix the problem.
Thanks, I tried this but unfortunately I still get the same error.
Regards,
Tao
Tao Cumplido wrote:
Thanks, I tried this but unfortunately I still get the same error.
Have you tried with different fonts?
Jürgen
Tao Cumplido wrote:
> when I select 'use non-Tex fonts' and select German to be my document
> language I get an error message.
It's a bug in polyglossia.
Entering
\usepackage{xkeyval}
In Document > Settings > Preamble should fix the problem.
HTH,
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller lyx.org> writes:
>
> \usepackage{xkeyval}
>
> In Document > Settings > Preamble should fix the problem.
>
Thanks, I tried this but unfortunately I still get the same error.
Regards,
Tao
Tao Cumplido wrote:
> Thanks, I tried this but unfortunately I still get the same error.
Have you tried with different fonts?
Jürgen
You mean filename.doc.lyx? It opens in the converter mode, but no
encoding will fit (not even the Unicode ones).
However, Lyx 2.0 will open it without problems, so it means the
encoding should be correct.
When I tell the program to export the file as Lyx 1.6.x, it will be as
unreadable as the
Guest_NP bernd.kappenberg at gmx.de writes:
You mean filename.doc.lyx?
No, I'm pretty sure Eberhard meant that 'doc' would be the document (file) name
and 'lyx' the extension. Do your files actually have names with those two
extensions (such as myfile.doc.lyx)? If so, how are they created?
You mean filename.doc.lyx? It opens in the converter mode, but no
encoding will fit (not even the Unicode ones).
However, Lyx 2.0 will open it without problems, so it means the
encoding should be correct.
When I tell the program to export the file as Lyx 1.6.x, it will be as
unreadable as the
Guest_NP bernd.kappenberg at gmx.de writes:
You mean filename.doc.lyx?
No, I'm pretty sure Eberhard meant that 'doc' would be the document (file) name
and 'lyx' the extension. Do your files actually have names with those two
extensions (such as myfile.doc.lyx)? If so, how are they created?
You mean filename.doc.lyx? It opens in the converter mode, but no
encoding will fit (not even the Unicode ones).
However, Lyx 2.0 will open it without problems, so it means the
encoding should be correct.
When I tell the program to export the file as Lyx 1.6.x, it will be as
unreadable as the
Guest_NP gmx.de> writes:
>
> You mean filename.doc.lyx?
No, I'm pretty sure Eberhard meant that 'doc' would be the document (file) name
and 'lyx' the extension. Do your files actually have names with those two
extensions (such as myfile.doc.lyx)? If so, how are they created?
Paul
Yes, checkbox is off.
So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
Bernd
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Are you sure you unchecked Document - Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM, Guest_NP wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
Lyx 1.6
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Guest_NP bernd.kappenb...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, checkbox is off.
So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
Yes.
Bernd
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Are you sure you unchecked Document - Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM, Guest_NP
Yes,
what does the command
file doc.lyx
say?
el
On 8/28/11 10:45 AM, Guest_NP wrote:
Yes, checkbox is off.
So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
Bernd
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Are you sure you unchecked Document - Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM,
Yes, checkbox is off.
So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
Bernd
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Are you sure you unchecked Document - Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM, Guest_NP wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
Lyx 1.6
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Guest_NP bernd.kappenb...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, checkbox is off.
So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
Yes.
Bernd
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Are you sure you unchecked Document - Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM, Guest_NP
Yes,
what does the command
file doc.lyx
say?
el
On 8/28/11 10:45 AM, Guest_NP wrote:
Yes, checkbox is off.
So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
Bernd
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Are you sure you unchecked Document - Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM,
Yes, checkbox is off.
So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
Bernd
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Are you sure you unchecked Document -> Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM, Guest_NP wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
Lyx 1.6
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Guest_NP wrote:
> Yes, checkbox is off.
>
> So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
>
Yes.
> Bernd
>
>
> On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
>> Are you sure you unchecked Document -> Compressed ?
>>
>> el
>>
>> On 8/27/11
Yes,
what does the command
file doc.lyx
say?
el
On 8/28/11 10:45 AM, Guest_NP wrote:
> Yes, checkbox is off.
>
> So Lyx 2.0 files open for you?
>
> Bernd
>
>
> On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
>> Are you sure you unchecked Document -> Compressed ?
>>
>> el
>>
>>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Guest_NP bernd.kappenb...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
Lyx 1.6 files do open.
Shouldn't be: there were no obvious changes to the way LyX saves its
files. They're still plain text files that can be
Are you sure you unchecked Document - Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM, Guest_NP wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
Lyx 1.6 files do open.
What has happened?
Bernd
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Guest_NP bernd.kappenb...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
Lyx 1.6 files do open.
Shouldn't be: there were no obvious changes to the way LyX saves its
files. They're still plain text files that can be
Are you sure you unchecked Document - Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM, Guest_NP wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
Lyx 1.6 files do open.
What has happened?
Bernd
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Guest_NP wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
> Lyx 1.6 files do open.
>
Shouldn't be: there were no obvious changes to the way LyX saves its
files. They're still plain text files that can
Are you sure you unchecked Document -> Compressed ?
el
On 8/27/11 6:49 PM, Guest_NP wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I am unable to open the Lyx 2.0 files with Wordpad or Editor.
> Lyx 1.6 files do open.
> What has happened?
>
> Bernd
>
>
Joern writes:
Hello,
after reading a couple of pages considering forward search in LyX 2.0
on Windows I have not been able to set it up for either SumatraPDF or Yap.
Thanks for the report. This will be fixed in the next release (2.0.1).
--
Enrico
Joern writes:
Hello,
after reading a couple of pages considering forward search in LyX 2.0
on Windows I have not been able to set it up for either SumatraPDF or Yap.
Thanks for the report. This will be fixed in the next release (2.0.1).
--
Enrico
Joern writes:
>
> Hello,
>
> after reading a couple of pages considering forward search in LyX 2.0
> on Windows I have not been able to set it up for either SumatraPDF or Yap.
Thanks for the report. This will be fixed in the next release (2.0.1).
--
Enrico
Hi guys,
Thank you Liviu, you were right I found out the MiKTeX that was
installed had been corrupted. After reinstalling MiKTeX LyX works very
well.
Thank you for all the support.
Sivakumar
On 7/18/2011 1:34 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:20 AM,
Hi guys,
Thank you Liviu, you were right I found out the MiKTeX that was
installed had been corrupted. After reinstalling MiKTeX LyX works very
well.
Thank you for all the support.
Sivakumar
On 7/18/2011 1:34 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:20 AM,
Hi guys,
Thank you Liviu, you were right I found out the MiKTeX that was
installed had been corrupted. After reinstalling MiKTeX LyX works very
well.
Thank you for all the support.
Sivakumar
On 7/18/2011 1:34 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:20 AM,
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Sivakumar u4331...@anu.edu.au wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Lyx 2.0. I was trying to view Intro.lyx which I access
through the help header in pdf format .
An error the directory path to the document cannot contain spaces pops
out.
What should I do ?
I assume
(please reply to the list, too)
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Sivakumar u4331...@anu.edu.au wrote:
Hi Liviu,
I am running Lyx 2.0 on Windows. I did as you suggested, saving the file in
C:\ Temp , when I try to view it in pdf, an error saying file doesnot exist
comes out.
I had print
On 7/17/2011 7:14 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
(please reply to the list, too)
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Sivakumaru4331...@anu.edu.au wrote:
Hi Liviu,
I am running Lyx 2.0 on Windows. I did as you suggested, saving the file in
C:\ Temp , when I try to view it in pdf, an error saying
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Sivakumar u4331...@anu.edu.au wrote:
When I load letter.lyx There was a pop up with the following message:
Lyx: Document class not available
The selected document class letter requires external files that are not
available. The document class can still be
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Sivakumar u4331...@anu.edu.au wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Lyx 2.0. I was trying to view Intro.lyx which I access
through the help header in pdf format .
An error the directory path to the document cannot contain spaces pops
out.
What should I do ?
I assume
(please reply to the list, too)
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Sivakumar u4331...@anu.edu.au wrote:
Hi Liviu,
I am running Lyx 2.0 on Windows. I did as you suggested, saving the file in
C:\ Temp , when I try to view it in pdf, an error saying file doesnot exist
comes out.
I had print
On 7/17/2011 7:14 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
(please reply to the list, too)
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Sivakumaru4331...@anu.edu.au wrote:
Hi Liviu,
I am running Lyx 2.0 on Windows. I did as you suggested, saving the file in
C:\ Temp , when I try to view it in pdf, an error saying
1 - 100 of 480 matches
Mail list logo