On May 4, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Jim Rockford wrote:
Hello : this is probably more of a latex issue than Lyx, but I would
like to
do this quickly in Lyx, so...
What I want is a neatly formatted set of relations like
a < S < b
c < T < d
and so forth. I just need the analog of the usual "3
Jim Rockford wrote:
Hello : this is probably more of a latex issue than Lyx, but I would like to
do this quickly in Lyx, so...
What I want is a neatly formatted set of relations like
a S b
c T d
and so forth. I just need the analog of the usual 3 column equation array
environment so that
Jim Rockford wrote:
Hello : this is probably more of a latex issue than Lyx, but I would like to
do this quickly in Lyx, so...
What I want is a neatly formatted set of relations like
a S b
c T d
and so forth. I just need the analog of the usual 3 column equation array
environment so that
Jim Rockford wrote:
Hello : this is probably more of a latex issue than Lyx, but I would like to
do this quickly in Lyx, so...
What I want is a neatly formatted set of relations like
a < S < b
c < T < d
and so forth. I just need the analog of the usual "3 column" equation array
environment
On 2009-04-27, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
In a document (Lyx1.6.1) I get an error message
TeX capacity exceeded
cite{a reference}{319}{13.5.3}{section*.37}
If you really absolutely need more capacity ...
I tried to remove the citation from the text for a later inspection what was
going
Am Tuesday 28 April 2009 10:26:30 schrieb Guenter Milde:
Still, the aux-file is generated (from the document and the
bibtex-extracted citations).
It is annoying to have to restart the session for each removal. Is there
a better way?
Does closing and reopening the doc help? Or just try a
On 2009-04-27, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
In a document (Lyx1.6.1) I get an error message
TeX capacity exceeded
cite{a reference}{319}{13.5.3}{section*.37}
If you really absolutely need more capacity ...
I tried to remove the citation from the text for a later inspection what was
going
Am Tuesday 28 April 2009 10:26:30 schrieb Guenter Milde:
Still, the aux-file is generated (from the document and the
bibtex-extracted citations).
It is annoying to have to restart the session for each removal. Is there
a better way?
Does closing and reopening the doc help? Or just try a
On 2009-04-27, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> In a document (Lyx1.6.1) I get an error message
> TeX capacity exceeded
> cite{a reference}{319}{13.5.3}{section*.37}
> If you really absolutely need more capacity ...
> I tried to remove the citation from the text for a later inspection what was
>
Am Tuesday 28 April 2009 10:26:30 schrieb Guenter Milde:
>
> Still, the aux-file is generated (from the document and the
> bibtex-extracted citations).
>
> > It is annoying to have to restart the session for each removal. Is there
> > a better way?
>
> Does closing and reopening the doc help? Or
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.comwrote:
From the KOMA-script doc I see that I can use the
\setkomafont{element}{command} directive to change the typeface for
specific
document elements.
Rather than the san-serif font for the title and section heads, I
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Don't have access to LyX at the moment. Does
\setkomafont{sectioning}{}
work for unnumbered sections? Probably not, but I thought I'd ask.
Bob,
Wow! It certainly does! It did not occur to me to try that, but it sure
does the job.
Many thanks,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
From the KOMA-script doc I see that I can use the
\setkomafont{element}{command} directive to change the typeface for
specific
document elements.
Rather than the san-serif font for the title and section heads, I prefer
to use the default body text typeface of
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, cmira...@kde-france.org wrote:
Try
\renewcommand\sectfont{\rmfamily}
Not very logical
Charles,
That's the old KOMA-script way. And, Bob's suggestion of using the
sectioning alias to dispositioning (Table 3.3 in the manual) works like a
charm.
Thank you,
Rich
--
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.comwrote:
From the KOMA-script doc I see that I can use the
\setkomafont{element}{command} directive to change the typeface for
specific
document elements.
Rather than the san-serif font for the title and section heads, I
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Don't have access to LyX at the moment. Does
\setkomafont{sectioning}{}
work for unnumbered sections? Probably not, but I thought I'd ask.
Bob,
Wow! It certainly does! It did not occur to me to try that, but it sure
does the job.
Many thanks,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
From the KOMA-script doc I see that I can use the
\setkomafont{element}{command} directive to change the typeface for
specific
document elements.
Rather than the san-serif font for the title and section heads, I prefer
to use the default body text typeface of
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, cmira...@kde-france.org wrote:
Try
\renewcommand\sectfont{\rmfamily}
Not very logical
Charles,
That's the old KOMA-script way. And, Bob's suggestion of using the
sectioning alias to dispositioning (Table 3.3 in the manual) works like a
charm.
Thank you,
Rich
--
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> From the KOMA-script doc I see that I can use the
> \setkomafont{element}{command} directive to change the typeface for
> specific
> document elements.
>
> Rather than the san-serif font for the title and section
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
Don't have access to LyX at the moment. Does
\setkomafont{sectioning}{}
work for unnumbered sections? Probably not, but I thought I'd ask.
Bob,
Wow! It certainly does! It did not occur to me to try that, but it sure
does the job.
Many thanks,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>> From the KOMA-script doc I see that I can use the
>> \setkomafont{element}{command} directive to change the typeface for
>> specific
>> document elements.
>>
>> Rather than the san-serif font for the title and section heads, I prefer
>> to use the default body text
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, cmira...@kde-france.org wrote:
Try
\renewcommand\sectfont{\rmfamily}
Not very logical
Charles,
That's the old KOMA-script way. And, Bob's suggestion of using the
sectioning alias to dispositioning (Table 3.3 in the manual) works like a
charm.
Thank you,
Rich
--
Vassil Lunchev wrote:
When Full screen is active and there is more than one screen of text, the
last line is always at the bottom of the screen. I prefer it being
somewhere in the middle of my screen. Is there a way to configure the
view so that it displays the last line somewhere in the
Vassil Lunchev wrote:
When Full screen is active and there is more than one screen of text, the
last line is always at the bottom of the screen. I prefer it being
somewhere in the middle of my screen. Is there a way to configure the
view so that it displays the last line somewhere in the
Vassil Lunchev wrote:
> When Full screen is active and there is more than one screen of text, the
> last line is always at the bottom of the screen. I prefer it being
> somewhere in the middle of my screen. Is there a way to configure the
> "view" so that it displays the last line somewhere in
Jay Austad wrote:
Can LyX provide the functionality that I need? I installed it, but the
version control menu is empty. How do I go about setting up LyX to
work with SVN? I couldn't find documentation on that.
The file you're editing has already be registered with version control.
So you
Jay Austad wrote:
Can LyX provide the functionality that I need? I installed it, but the
version control menu is empty. How do I go about setting up LyX to
work with SVN? I couldn't find documentation on that.
The file you're editing has already be registered with version control.
So you
Jay Austad wrote:
Can LyX provide the functionality that I need? I installed it, but the
version control menu is empty. How do I go about setting up LyX to
work with SVN? I couldn't find documentation on that.
The file you're editing has already be registered with version control.
So you
R. Josh III schrieb:
Is it possible to write vietnamese (with viqr code for instance) with
LyX-1.6.1 ?
I don't know about viqr, but I created a Wiki page describing the basic steps:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Vietnamese
To use your french keyboard for vietnamese, you can create your own
R. Josh III schrieb:
Is it possible to write vietnamese (with viqr code for instance) with
LyX-1.6.1 ?
I don't know about viqr, but I created a Wiki page describing the basic steps:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Vietnamese
To use your french keyboard for vietnamese, you can create your own
R. Josh III schrieb:
Is it possible to write vietnamese (with viqr code for instance) with
LyX-1.6.1 ?
I don't know about "viqr", but I created a Wiki page describing the basic steps:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Vietnamese
To use your french keyboard for vietnamese, you can create your own
Ana Rodriguez schrieb:
Is there any way to make lyx not to break words in the pdf files at
the end of the line?
Yes, you can either use a non-breakable space between words as described in sec. 3.5.1 of the
UserGuide or put a word into a special box as described in sec. 3.9.2 of the
Ana Rodriguez schrieb:
Is there any way to make lyx not to break words in the pdf files at
the end of the line?
Yes, you can either use a non-breakable space between words as described in sec. 3.5.1 of the
UserGuide or put a word into a special box as described in sec. 3.9.2 of the
Ana Rodriguez schrieb:
Is there any way to make lyx not to break words in the pdf files at
the end of the line?
Yes, you can either use a non-breakable space between words as described in sec. 3.5.1 of the
UserGuide or put a word into a special box as described in sec. 3.9.2 of the
Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Hi folks,
first of all: thank you for all your replies. And yes, after hearing what you
came up with I think ERT should remain ERT and inserting an automatic blank
_within_ the ERT is not a good idea.
But wait: what is LyX saying about itself, WYSIWYM? Hey, if I put a
Dear Helge,
thank you for your reply. There were several of them - and I came to the end
that I - to some extend - took it too simple. My personal wrap up is the fact
that the current TeX-inserts in LyX are not encapsulated - i. e. they reach
further than the closing insert bracket.
So, maybe
Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Hi folks,
first of all: thank you for all your replies. And yes, after hearing what you
came up with I think ERT should remain ERT and inserting an automatic blank
_within_ the ERT is not a good idea.
But wait: what is LyX saying about itself, WYSIWYM? Hey, if I put a
Dear Helge,
thank you for your reply. There were several of them - and I came to the end
that I - to some extend - took it too simple. My personal wrap up is the fact
that the current TeX-inserts in LyX are not encapsulated - i. e. they reach
further than the closing insert bracket.
So, maybe
Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Hi folks,
first of all: thank you for all your replies. And yes, after hearing what you
came up with I think ERT should remain ERT and inserting an automatic blank
_within_ the ERT is not a good idea.
But wait: what is LyX saying about itself, WYSIWYM? Hey, if I put a
Dear Helge,
thank you for your reply. There were several of them - and I came to the end
that I - to some extend - took it too simple. My personal wrap up is the fact
that the current TeX-inserts in LyX are not encapsulated - i. e. they reach
further than the closing insert "bracket".
So,
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Hello,
In my LyX installation 1.6.1 on Mac OSX I have a cross-reference window with
an input field called Name which is always grayed out so that no input is
possible.
Maybe this should work for formatted references? But how to use it?
This is only used with
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Hello,
In my LyX installation 1.6.1 on Mac OSX I have a cross-reference window with
an input field called Name which is always grayed out so that no input is
possible.
Maybe this should work for formatted references? But how to use it?
This is only used with
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Hello,
In my LyX installation 1.6.1 on Mac OSX I have a cross-reference window with
an input field called "Name" which is always grayed out so that no input is
possible.
Maybe this should work for formatted references? But how to use it?
This is only used with
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Hi Vincent,
I wouldn't consider / being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
is \ not a good idea.
If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled
underscore, say __ as a replacement for \. __ is harmless in any
regard, escaping is not
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with an invalid
machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring
resulted in success.
So, at least
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Hi Vincent,
I wouldn't consider / being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
is \ not a good idea.
If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled
underscore, say __ as a replacement for \. __ is harmless in any
regard, escaping is not
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with an invalid
machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring
resulted in success.
So, at least
> Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
>> Hi Vincent,
>> I wouldn't consider "/" being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
>> is "\" not a good idea.
>>
>> If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled
>> underscore, say "__" as a replacement for "\". "__" is harmless in any
>>
> Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
>> Dear listmembers,
>> well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
>> first attempt of using "fprintf("%s\n", name1); ended with an "invalid
>> machinecode" message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring
>> resulted in success.
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Hi Vincent,
I wouldn't consider / being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
is \ not a good idea.
If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled underscore,
say __ as a replacement for \. __ is harmless in any regard, escaping
is not
On Jan 1, 2009, at 11:33 AM, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
When including figures in reports, I mostly (but not always) put them
centered, in contrast, the remainder of the text remains aligned
justified.
And I am sure that I could potentially write a specific environment
doing
this, use
Hi Vincent,
this solution is perfectly fine with me - would you kindly consider to include
my debugging - extension to GuiApplication.cpp as well?
I never ever worked on a public source repository - and basically I think that
I would not come up with too many contributions so some other nice
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Hi Vincent,
I wouldn't consider / being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
is \ not a good idea.
If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled underscore,
say __ as a replacement for \. __ is harmless in any regard, escaping
is not
On Jan 1, 2009, at 11:33 AM, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
When including figures in reports, I mostly (but not always) put them
centered, in contrast, the remainder of the text remains aligned
justified.
And I am sure that I could potentially write a specific environment
doing
this, use
Hi Vincent,
this solution is perfectly fine with me - would you kindly consider to include
my debugging - extension to GuiApplication.cpp as well?
I never ever worked on a public source repository - and basically I think that
I would not come up with too many contributions so some other nice
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Hi Vincent,
I wouldn't consider "/" being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
is "\" not a good idea.
If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled underscore,
say "__" as a replacement for "\". "__" is harmless in any regard, escaping
On Jan 1, 2009, at 11:33 AM, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
When including figures in reports, I mostly (but not always) put them
centered, in contrast, the remainder of the text remains aligned
justified.
And I am sure that I could potentially write a specific environment
doing
this, use
Hi Vincent,
this solution is perfectly fine with me - would you kindly consider to include
my debugging - extension to GuiApplication.cpp as well?
I never ever worked on a public source repository - and basically I think that
I would not come up with too many contributions so some other nice
Dear Steve,
dear listmembers,
your answer tells me that I haven't been precise enough. Imagine you have a
section in your document you want to be centered rather than (i.e.)
flushleft. To achieve this in LyX, you have to mark the section and then
klick on the section menu, from where you can
In 1.6.x you can right-click to do this. It is still not as quick as
a button, but is quicker than digging through menus...
On Jan 1, 2009, at 5:27 AM, Dieter Jurzitza dieter.jurzi...@t-
online.de wrote:
Dear Steve,
dear listmembers,
your answer tells me that I haven't been precise
On Thursday 01 January 2009 07:27:29 am Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Dear Steve,
dear listmembers,
your answer tells me that I haven't been precise enough. Imagine you have a
section in your document you want to be centered rather than (i.e.)
flushleft. To achieve this in LyX, you have to mark the
Well, lazy me, what I would like to see are three little symbols for
flush-right, flush-left or center on the top-level menu bar that help me
avoid diving into a submenu in order to achieve this.
I don't have a red robe or a long white beard, so if you still want to
have the four (you need
Dear listmembers,
in the meantime I created some icons for my purpose and have been putting them
in the directory /usr/share/lyx/images.
From the stdtoolbars.inc file I know (theoretically) that the naming
convention for the files ought to be
action_parameter.png
following this strategy
Dear listmembers,
dear Vincent,
dear Steve,
well, I can see, christmas just passed by, so I am not t sad about Vincent
for not having the red robe and the beard.
But many thanks to Vincent, this really did the trick!
And, Steve, you do not have to make me a TeXnician - I readily am (since
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with an invalid
machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring resulted
in success.
So, at least for linux I can confirm that \ in
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with an invalid
machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with an invalid
machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring resulted
in success.
So, at least for
Dear Andre,
thanks for the pointer, I see, I see, I forgot to apply the stderr in
fprintf ...
I know, there are lots of people around having higher programming capabilities
than I do ;-), but anyway, one should not mix up C and C++, so, it
wasn't that bad to modify LYXERR output instead
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient,
though. My first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with
an invalid machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout
messagestring resulted
rgheck schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient,
though. My first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended
with an invalid machinecode message - but patching the
debugging-cout
Hi Vincent,
I wouldn't consider / being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
is \ not a good idea.
If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled underscore,
say __ as a replacement for \. __ is harmless in any regard, escaping
is not complicated.
As an alternative
Dear Steve,
dear listmembers,
your answer tells me that I haven't been precise enough. Imagine you have a
section in your document you want to be centered rather than (i.e.)
flushleft. To achieve this in LyX, you have to mark the section and then
klick on the section menu, from where you can
In 1.6.x you can right-click to do this. It is still not as quick as
a button, but is quicker than digging through menus...
On Jan 1, 2009, at 5:27 AM, Dieter Jurzitza dieter.jurzi...@t-
online.de wrote:
Dear Steve,
dear listmembers,
your answer tells me that I haven't been precise
On Thursday 01 January 2009 07:27:29 am Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Dear Steve,
dear listmembers,
your answer tells me that I haven't been precise enough. Imagine you have a
section in your document you want to be centered rather than (i.e.)
flushleft. To achieve this in LyX, you have to mark the
Well, lazy me, what I would like to see are three little symbols for
flush-right, flush-left or center on the top-level menu bar that help me
avoid diving into a submenu in order to achieve this.
I don't have a red robe or a long white beard, so if you still want to
have the four (you need
Dear listmembers,
in the meantime I created some icons for my purpose and have been putting them
in the directory /usr/share/lyx/images.
From the stdtoolbars.inc file I know (theoretically) that the naming
convention for the files ought to be
action_parameter.png
following this strategy
Dear listmembers,
dear Vincent,
dear Steve,
well, I can see, christmas just passed by, so I am not t sad about Vincent
for not having the red robe and the beard.
But many thanks to Vincent, this really did the trick!
And, Steve, you do not have to make me a TeXnician - I readily am (since
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with an invalid
machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring resulted
in success.
So, at least for linux I can confirm that \ in
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with an invalid
machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with an invalid
machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring resulted
in success.
So, at least for
Dear Andre,
thanks for the pointer, I see, I see, I forgot to apply the stderr in
fprintf ...
I know, there are lots of people around having higher programming capabilities
than I do ;-), but anyway, one should not mix up C and C++, so, it
wasn't that bad to modify LYXERR output instead
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient,
though. My first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended with
an invalid machinecode message - but patching the debugging-cout
messagestring resulted
rgheck schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient,
though. My first attempt of using fprintf(%s\n, name1); ended
with an invalid machinecode message - but patching the
debugging-cout
Hi Vincent,
I wouldn't consider / being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
is \ not a good idea.
If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled underscore,
say __ as a replacement for \. __ is harmless in any regard, escaping
is not complicated.
As an alternative
Dear Steve,
dear listmembers,
your answer tells me that I haven't been precise enough. Imagine you have a
section in your document you want to be centered rather than (i.e.)
flushleft. To achieve this in LyX, you have to mark the section and then
klick on the section menu, from where you can
In 1.6.x you can right-click to do this. It is still not as quick as
a button, but is quicker than digging through menus...
On Jan 1, 2009, at 5:27 AM, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Dear Steve,
dear listmembers,
your answer tells me that I haven't been precise
On Thursday 01 January 2009 07:27:29 am Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
> Dear Steve,
> dear listmembers,
> your answer tells me that I haven't been precise enough. Imagine you have a
> section in your document you want to be centered rather than (i.e.)
> flushleft. To achieve this in LyX, you have to mark
Well, lazy me, what I would like to see are three little symbols for
flush-right, flush-left or center on the top-level menu bar that help me
avoid diving into a submenu in order to achieve this.
I don't have a "red robe or a long white beard", so if you still want to
have the four (you
Dear listmembers,
in the meantime I created some icons for my purpose and have been putting them
in the directory /usr/share/lyx/images.
From the stdtoolbars.inc file I know (theoretically) that the naming
convention for the files ought to be
_.png
following this strategy based on i.e.
Dear listmembers,
dear Vincent,
dear Steve,
well, I can see, christmas just passed by, so I am not t sad about Vincent
for not having the red robe and the beard.
But many thanks to Vincent, this really did the trick!
And, Steve, you do not have to make me a TeXnician - I readily am (since
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using "fprintf("%s\n", name1); ended with an "invalid
machinecode" message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring resulted
in success.
So, at least for linux I can confirm that
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
> Dear listmembers,
> well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
> first attempt of using "fprintf("%s\n", name1); ended with an "invalid
> machinecode" message - but patching the debugging-cout
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient, though. My
first attempt of using "fprintf("%s\n", name1); ended with an "invalid
machinecode" message - but patching the debugging-cout messagestring resulted
in success.
So, at least
Dear Andre,
thanks for the pointer, I see, I see, I forgot to apply the "stderr" in
fprintf ...
I know, there are lots of people around having higher programming capabilities
than I do ;-), but anyway, one should not mix up C and C++, so, it
wasn't that bad to modify LYXERR output instead
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient,
though. My first attempt of using "fprintf("%s\n", name1); ended with
an "invalid machinecode" message - but patching the debugging-cout
messagestring
rgheck schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Dieter Jurzitza schreef:
Dear listmembers,
well, obviously my C-programming capabilities were sufficient,
though. My first attempt of using "fprintf("%s\n", name1); ended
with an "invalid machinecode" message - but patching the
debugging-cout
Hi Vincent,
I wouldn't consider "/" being a good idea when it comes to file access, as
is "\" not a good idea.
If I was asked I'd rather suggest to use something like a doubled underscore,
say "__" as a replacement for "\". "__" is harmless in any regard, escaping
is not complicated.
As an
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 10:03:52 am Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Dear listmembers,
from other text processing systems (b ) I am acustomed to the
possibility to directly access the section attributes (centered, right
adjusted, left adjusted) via small icons in the menu bar.
I know this
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 10:03:52 am Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Dear listmembers,
from other text processing systems (b ) I am acustomed to the
possibility to directly access the section attributes (centered, right
adjusted, left adjusted) via small icons in the menu bar.
I know this
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 10:03:52 am Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
> Dear listmembers,
> from other text processing systems (b ) I am acustomed to the
> possibility to directly access the section attributes (centered, right
> adjusted, left adjusted) via small icons in the menu bar.
> I know
701 - 800 of 1387 matches
Mail list logo