Re: How figure and table numbering is defined?

Thanks Daniel. I never looked at the content of numreport.inc. Perhaps you have an idea for my problem I uploaded here before? (https://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-users/2022-August/004205.html) Thanks very much Ehud --- Original Message --- On Sunday, August 28th, 2022 at 8:45 PM,

Re: How figure and table numbering is defined?

On 2022-08-28 20:30, tush via lyx-users wrote: I am just wondering how lyx knows how to display the numbering of floats when the document class is book and according to what rule to change the numbering when the document class is changed to article, for example. Yes yes, LyX "doesn't know

Re: How figure and table numbering is defined?

I am just wondering how lyx knows how to display the numbering of floats when the document class is book and according to what rule to change the numbering when the document class is changed to article, for example. Yes yes, LyX "doesn't know anything about latex", and it is actually latex that

Re: How figure and table numbering is defined?

El dom, 28 ago 2022 a las 18:44, tush via lyx-users (< lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>) escribió: > I tried to look where the numbering (within the lyx editor) of figures and > tables is defined. > > If I choose book doc class, a figure gets the number > "chapter-number.figurenumber-within-the-chapter",

How figure and table numbering is defined?

I tried to look where the numbering (within the lyx editor) of figures and tables is defined. If I choose book doc class, a figure gets the number "chapter-number.figurenumber-within-the-chapter", whereas if I choose article doc class, it changes to "figure-number-within-the-whole-article".

Re: Koma-script Book Figure/Table numbering.

On 04/02/2021 16:42, José Abílio Matos wrote: It seems that this is on purpose due to using parts. ... In LyX you can do it, in the master document, with: Document -> Settings -> Document Class -> Class Options -> Custom and inserting in the Custom field: numbers=noendperiod I hope that

Re: Koma-script Book Figure/Table numbering.

On Thursday, February 4, 2021 2:51:44 PM WET Norman Dunbar wrote: > Hi Rich, > > thanks for the advice. Please find the test case attached. Hopefully. > > LyxTableBug is the master, childDocument is, well, the child document. > > > Cheers, > Norm. It seems that this is on purpose due to using

Re: Koma-script Book Figure/Table numbering.

On 04/02/2021 14:32, Paul A. Rubin wrote: On the subject of upgrading, you can get a .deb file by adding the developer PPA as a software source, doing a refresh in the update manager, and then updating LyX. Here's the line for adding the PPA: deb

Re: Koma-script Book Figure/Table numbering.

On 2/4/21 9:25 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Thu, 4 Feb 2021, Norman Dunbar wrote: * Lyx 2.2.4 (From the Mint distro, not downloaded.) Norman, Could be an issue fixed since then. The current version is 2.3.6.1. I have a test case if anyone is interested, but I doubt I'd be allowed to attach

Re: Koma-script Book Figure/Table numbering.

On Thu, 4 Feb 2021, Norman Dunbar wrote: * Lyx 2.2.4 (From the Mint distro, not downloaded.) Norman, Could be an issue fixed since then. The current version is 2.3.6.1. I have a test case if anyone is interested, but I doubt I'd be allowed to attach it to a list posting, especially as a

Koma-script Book Figure/Table numbering.

Hello All, I have searched the archives and googled for information, but I found nothing useful. If I have missed something, please be gentle with me! ;-) My development setup: * Linux Mint 19.3 64 bit. * Lyx 2.2.4 (From the Mint distro, not downloaded.) * Koma Script Book document class.

Re: Table numbering problem

Am 26.01.2012 17:21, schrieb Emilio Murado: I have a problem numbering tables. I have a table nested into another, and both are inside a figure. You have not nested them into figures and this would also only cause problems. When I take a look at the figures inside LyX, they are all ok. But

Re: Table numbering problem

Am 26.01.2012 17:21, schrieb Emilio Murado: I have a problem numbering tables. I have a table nested into another, and both are inside a figure. You have not nested them into figures and this would also only cause problems. When I take a look at the figures inside LyX, they are all ok. But

Re: Table numbering problem

Am 26.01.2012 17:21, schrieb Emilio Murado: I have a problem numbering tables. I have a table nested into another, and both are inside a figure. You have not nested them into figures and this would also only cause problems. When I take a look at the figures inside LyX, they are all ok. But

Re: Table numbering problem

On 26/01/2012 11:21 AM, Emilio Murado wrote: Hi all. I have a problem numbering tables. I have a table nested into another, and both are inside a figure. When I take a look at the figures inside LyX, they are all ok. But when I export to DVI or PDF, the figures are counting in +2 increments.

Re: Table numbering problem

On 26/01/2012 11:21 AM, Emilio Murado wrote: Hi all. I have a problem numbering tables. I have a table nested into another, and both are inside a figure. When I take a look at the figures inside LyX, they are all ok. But when I export to DVI or PDF, the figures are counting in +2 increments.

Re: Table numbering problem

On 26/01/2012 11:21 AM, Emilio Murado wrote: Hi all. I have a problem numbering tables. I have a table nested into another, and both are inside a figure. When I take a look at the figures inside LyX, they are all ok. But when I export to DVI or PDF, the figures are counting in +2 increments.

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/07/10, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because the table dialog is

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/07/10, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because the table dialog is

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

On 03/07/10, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: >> 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables >> and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that >> automatically. Is that possible? > >I never had this

Re: Strange table numbering

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables > > and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that > > automatically. Is that possible? > > I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because > the table

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

Stefano Franchi schrieb: Do you mean that this particular behavior was never reported, or that there is *no* situation in which Lyx may trigger the long table option automatically? I meant both. If the latter, then I think I found a bug. It would be pretty hard to replicate, unfortunately.

Re: Strange table numbering

Department of Philosophy Ph: (979) 862-2211 Texas AM University Fax: (979) 845-0458 305B Bolton Hall fran...@philosophy.tamu.edu College Station, TX 77843-4237 table-numbering-test.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because

Re: Strange table numbering

Department of Philosophy Ph: (979) 862-2211 Texas AM University Fax: (979) 845-0458 305B Bolton Hall fran...@philosophy.tamu.edu College Station, TX 77843-4237 table-numbering-test.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because

Re: Strange table numbering

ssary. Puzzled, S. > >regards Uwe __ Stefano Franchi Department of Philosophy Ph: (979) 862-2211 Texas A University Fax: (979) 845-0458 305B Bolton Hall fran...@philosophy.tamu.edu College Station, TX 77843-4237 table-numbering-test.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 07.03.2010 17:16, schrieb Stefano Franchi: 1. Why the longtable setting was turned on, since these are short tables and I do remember NOT choosing it? It seems that Lyx had done that automatically. Is that possible? I never had this case nor was this reported (except of LyX 2.0svn because

Strange table numbering

Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not particularly enlightening. S.

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not

Strange table numbering

Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not particularly enlightening. S.

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not

Strange table numbering

Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not particularly enlightening. S.

Re: Strange table numbering

Am 06.03.2010 22:49, schrieb Stefano Franchi: Another puzzling issue: I have a file with two figure floats and two table floats. In the compiled pdf, the figures are correctly numbered as figure 1 and figure 2, while the tables come out as table 2 and table 4. Latex log output is not

Re: Long table messes up table numbering

Axsuul wrote: Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes the next table numbering skip. http://texnik.dante.de/cgi-bin/mainFAQ.cgi?file=table/longtable#caption Jürgen

Re: Long table messes up table numbering

Axsuul schrieb: Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes the next table numbering skip. I.e. Table 1 (long table) then the next table number would be Table 3 This behaviour and the workaround is described in sec. 2.6.3 of the Embedded Objects manual

Re: Long table messes up table numbering

Axsuul wrote: Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes the next table numbering skip. http://texnik.dante.de/cgi-bin/mainFAQ.cgi?file=table/longtable#caption Jürgen

Re: Long table messes up table numbering

Axsuul schrieb: Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes the next table numbering skip. I.e. Table 1 (long table) then the next table number would be Table 3 This behaviour and the workaround is described in sec. 2.6.3 of the Embedded Objects manual

Re: Long table messes up table numbering

Axsuul wrote: > Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes > the next table numbering skip. http://texnik.dante.de/cgi-bin/mainFAQ.cgi?file=table/longtable#caption Jürgen

Re: Long table messes up table numbering

Axsuul schrieb: Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes the next table numbering skip. I.e. Table 1 (long table) then the next table number would be Table 3 This behaviour and the workaround is described in sec. 2.6.3 of the Embedded Objects manual

Long table messes up table numbering

Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes the next table numbering skip. I.e. Table 1 (long table) then the next table number would be Table 3 -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Long-table-messes-up-table-numbering-tp2267503p2267503.html

Long table messes up table numbering

Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes the next table numbering skip. I.e. Table 1 (long table) then the next table number would be Table 3 -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Long-table-messes-up-table-numbering-tp2267503p2267503.html

Long table messes up table numbering

Anyone having this problem? It seems to be that having a long table makes the next table numbering skip. I.e. Table 1 (long table) then the next table number would be Table 3 -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Long-table-messes-up-table-numbering-tp2267503p2267503.html

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

(or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which confuses me. Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I don't want my sections to be numbered. But then if i insert a Table of Content the Contents field in the pdf file stays empty while it is correctly

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

(or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which confuses me. Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I don't want my sections to be numbered. But then if i insert a Table of Content the Contents field in the pdf file stays empty while it is correctly

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

oon as I create a pdf > (or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which > confuses me. > > Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I don't want my > "sections" to be numbered. But then if i insert a "Table of Content" the

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

I've the same annoying problem. Was it solved? Yehya -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1140559.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

I've the same annoying problem. Was it solved? Yehya -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1140559.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lyx's strange table numbering

I've the same annoying problem. Was it solved? Yehya -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lyx%27s-strange-table-numbering-tp481291p1140559.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Lyx's strange table numbering

Hi I use Lyx to write a document with a lot of tables. However, I have a very strange problem in lyx everything works fine but as soon as I create a pdf (or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which confuses me. Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I

Lyx's strange table numbering

Hi I use Lyx to write a document with a lot of tables. However, I have a very strange problem in lyx everything works fine but as soon as I create a pdf (or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which confuses me. Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I

Lyx's strange table numbering

Hi I use Lyx to write a document with a lot of tables. However, I have a very strange problem in lyx everything works fine but as soon as I create a pdf (or a dvi for that matter) the table numbering is 1,3,4,5,6,7, Which confuses me. Furthermore, I use the section*, subsection* because I

Re: Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

Christian Liesen schrieb: sorry for asking, but I could not find any hints on this list or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table

Re: Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table 1.3 b: foo I'll add a section about this in the manual that refers to section 4.2.1

Re: Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

Christian Liesen schrieb: sorry for asking, but I could not find any hints on this list or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table

Re: Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table 1.3 b: foo I'll add a section about this in the manual that refers to section 4.2.1

Re: Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

Christian Liesen schrieb: sorry for asking, but I could not find any hints on this list or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table

Re: Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table 1.3 b: foo I'll add a section about this in the manual that refers to section 4.2.1

Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

Hi, sorry for asking, but I could not find any hints on this list or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table 1.3 b: foo and so

Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

Hi, sorry for asking, but I could not find any hints on this list or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table 1.3 b: foo and so

Table numbering: subsection arabic and table no. alph

Hi, sorry for asking, but I could not find any hints on this list or in the Embedded Objects-Manual on how to change table numbering to a mixed mode of arabic and alph. I have several tables in a subsection, and I want the caption to look like Table 1.3 a: foo Table 1.3 b: foo and so

Re: Table Numbering

Jose' Matos wrote: On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:00, Jan wrote: Does anyone have an idea how I could fix this? I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) Well, it didn't happen this time. ;-)

Re: Table Numbering

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 16:16, Paul A. Rubin wrote:   I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) Did I wrote that?! :-) I had very few time to answer and this is result. :-) Well, it didn't

Re: Table Numbering

Jose' Matos wrote: On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:00, Jan wrote: Does anyone have an idea how I could fix this? I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) Well, it didn't happen this time. ;-)

Re: Table Numbering

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 16:16, Paul A. Rubin wrote:   I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) Did I wrote that?! :-) I had very few time to answer and this is result. :-) Well, it didn't

Re: Table Numbering

Jose' Matos wrote: On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:00, Jan wrote: Does anyone have an idea how I could fix this? I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) Well, it didn't happen this time. ;-)

Re: Table Numbering

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 16:16, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > >   I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it > > happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) Did I wrote that?! :-) I had very few time to answer and this is result. :-) > Well, it

Re: Table Numbering

Jan wrote: Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for

Re: Table Numbering

Hello Paul, Apparently there was something wrong with the first float:table. After deleting/rewriting the float:table, the problem solved itself. I'm sorry, I guess I'm getting a bit edgy because of my deadline. I've attached an example anyway. Thanks nonetheless. Greets, Jan example.lyx

Re: Table Numbering

Jan wrote: Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for

Re: Table Numbering

Hello Paul, Apparently there was something wrong with the first float:table. After deleting/rewriting the float:table, the problem solved itself. I'm sorry, I guess I'm getting a bit edgy because of my deadline. I've attached an example anyway. Thanks nonetheless. Greets, Jan example.lyx

Re: Table Numbering

Jan wrote: Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for

Re: Table Numbering

Hello Paul, Apparently there was something wrong with the first float:table. After deleting/rewriting the float:table, the problem solved itself. I'm sorry, I guess I'm getting a bit edgy because of my deadline. I've attached an example anyway. Thanks nonetheless. Greets, Jan example.lyx

Re: Re: Table Numbering

Hello Paul, Apparently there was something wrong with the first float:table. After deleting/rewriting the float:table, the problem solved itself. I'm sorry. I guess I'm getting a bit edgy because of my deadline. I've attached an example anyway. Greets, Jan example.lyx Description: Binary

Re: Table Numbering

On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:00, Jan wrote: Does anyone have an idea how I could fix this? I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) Thanks, Jan -- José Abílio

Re: Re: Table Numbering

Hello Paul, Apparently there was something wrong with the first float:table. After deleting/rewriting the float:table, the problem solved itself. I'm sorry. I guess I'm getting a bit edgy because of my deadline. I've attached an example anyway. Greets, Jan example.lyx Description: Binary

Re: Table Numbering

On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:00, Jan wrote: Does anyone have an idea how I could fix this? I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) Thanks, Jan -- José Abílio

Re: Re: Table Numbering

Hello Paul, Apparently there was something wrong with the first float:table. After deleting/rewriting the float:table, the problem solved itself. I'm sorry. I guess I'm getting a bit edgy because of my deadline. I've attached an example anyway. Greets, Jan example.lyx Description: Binary

Re: Table Numbering

On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:00, Jan wrote: > Does anyone have an idea how I could fix this? I suspect that you using a longtable inside a float. I may be wrong (it happens ;-) but it produces the same behaviour that are seeing. :-) > Thanks, > > Jan -- José Abílio

Table Numbering

Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for tables and not

Re: Table Numbering

Jan wrote: Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for

Table Numbering

Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for tables and not

Re: Table Numbering

Jan wrote: Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for

Table Numbering

Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for tables and not

Re: Table Numbering

Jan wrote: Dear all, I have an odd problem with the numbering of tables. The document I've written includes an Appendix with tables and figures. The numbering for the tables omits A.2 and jumps directly from Table A.1 to A.3 and then continues on normally, A.4 etc. This only occurs for

Re: Table numbering - was: Figure numbering

On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 08:24:09PM +0200, Roland Schmitz wrote: [...] I think there's a lot to learn for me ... An easy thing to start with would be quoting in mails. In the lyx mailing lists (as well as in lots of other mailing lists and newsgroups) it is common to cut down the mails one is

Re: Table numbering - was: Figure numbering

On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 08:24:09PM +0200, Roland Schmitz wrote: [...] I think there's a lot to learn for me ... An easy thing to start with would be quoting in mails. In the lyx mailing lists (as well as in lots of other mailing lists and newsgroups) it is common to cut down the mails one is

Re: Table numbering - was: Figure numbering

On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 08:24:09PM +0200, Roland Schmitz wrote: > [...] I think there's a lot to learn for me ... An easy thing to start with would be quoting in mails. In the lyx mailing lists (as well as in lots of other mailing lists and newsgroups) it is common to cut down the mails one is

Table numbering - was: Figure numbering

Hi, today i want to change the table numbering, like the figure numbering i want starit forward numbering insted of chapter wise nubering. I tried to change Paul Smith solution (take a look at the end of the mail) for figure numbering into a solution for table numbering. Because i'm a newbee

Re: Table numbering - was: Figure numbering

today i want to change the table numbering, like the figure numbering i want starit forward numbering insted of chapter wise nubering. I tried to change Paul Smith solution (take a look at the end of the mail) for figure numbering into a solution for table numbering. Because i'm a newbee, i

  1   2   >