stefano franchi wrote:
enclosed: log of the run with -dbg depend when opening and compiling the
file latex log (copied from within Lyx's window)
As suspected: the bcf file is not mentioned in the log file, so LyX is not
aware of it and cannot track it.
Now this might be a biblatex version
stefano franchi wrote:
Unfortunately I cannot upgrade biber/biblatex yet. I am using a
customized biblatex style for a big project, and I am afraid I may
break something (from past experiences with biblatex, I would say it
is certain an upgrade would break the style).
I'll wait. I have got
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
\typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
Indeed it works!
In fact, just adding
AddToPreamble
\typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
EndPreamble
to my biblatex module solves the problem across all my files.
Many thanks.
Stefano
stefano franchi wrote:
Indeed it works!
In fact, just adding
AddToPreamble
\typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
EndPreamble
to my biblatex module solves the problem across all my files.
Excellent!
Jürgen
Richard Heck wrote:
This should definitely go to that part of the wiki
Done.
Jürgen
stefano franchi wrote:
enclosed: log of the run with -dbg depend when opening and compiling the
file latex log (copied from within Lyx's window)
As suspected: the bcf file is not mentioned in the log file, so LyX is not
aware of it and cannot track it.
Now this might be a biblatex version
stefano franchi wrote:
Unfortunately I cannot upgrade biber/biblatex yet. I am using a
customized biblatex style for a big project, and I am afraid I may
break something (from past experiences with biblatex, I would say it
is certain an upgrade would break the style).
I'll wait. I have got
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
\typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
Indeed it works!
In fact, just adding
AddToPreamble
\typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
EndPreamble
to my biblatex module solves the problem across all my files.
Many thanks.
Stefano
stefano franchi wrote:
Indeed it works!
In fact, just adding
AddToPreamble
\typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
EndPreamble
to my biblatex module solves the problem across all my files.
Excellent!
Jürgen
Richard Heck wrote:
This should definitely go to that part of the wiki
Done.
Jürgen
stefano franchi wrote:
> enclosed: log of the run with -dbg depend when opening and compiling the
> file latex log (copied from within Lyx's window)
As suspected: the bcf file is not mentioned in the log file, so LyX is not
aware of it and cannot track it.
Now this might be a biblatex version
stefano franchi wrote:
> Unfortunately I cannot upgrade biber/biblatex yet. I am using a
> customized biblatex style for a big project, and I am afraid I may
> break something (from past experiences with biblatex, I would say it
> is certain an upgrade would break the style).
>
> I'll wait. I
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> \typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
Indeed it works!
In fact, just adding
AddToPreamble
\typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
EndPreamble
to my biblatex module solves the problem across all my files.
Many thanks.
Stefano
stefano franchi wrote:
> Indeed it works!
> In fact, just adding
>
> AddToPreamble
> \typeout{File: \jobname.bcf}
> EndPreamble
>
> to my biblatex module solves the problem across all my files.
Excellent!
Jürgen
Richard Heck wrote:
> This should definitely go to that part of the wiki
Done.
Jürgen
On 04/27/2011 10:44 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
What is the output if you run lyx -dbg latex and view your document?
Jurgen,
all I can figure out from the output is that Lyx realizes there are
undefined references and runs bibtex. It may be running biber and
the string may be misleading, I
Richard Heck wrote:
Can you try the attached patch? I think we aren't detecting:
LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line: Package biblatex Warning: Please (re)run Biber
on the file:
LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line: (biblatex)
Talk-for-publication-proceedings
LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line: (biblatex)
stefano franchi wrote:
Patched as instructed, recompiled, and rerun. Log file is attached. I
don't know what was supposed to change, if anything. I didn't see any
difference. You guys may be able to spot something interesting.
Please apply the attached patch. Report what LyX reports on the
stefano franchi wrote:
I patched the file and recompiled. But there is no such line in the
output, either in the console or in the error log
OK, then let's add some more debug code. Look what the attached reports (on
the console).
Jürgen
Index: src/LaTeX.cpp
On 04/27/2011 10:44 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
What is the output if you run lyx -dbg latex and view your document?
Jurgen,
all I can figure out from the output is that Lyx realizes there are
undefined references and runs bibtex. It may be running biber and
the string may be misleading, I
Richard Heck wrote:
Can you try the attached patch? I think we aren't detecting:
LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line: Package biblatex Warning: Please (re)run Biber
on the file:
LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line: (biblatex)
Talk-for-publication-proceedings
LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line: (biblatex)
stefano franchi wrote:
Patched as instructed, recompiled, and rerun. Log file is attached. I
don't know what was supposed to change, if anything. I didn't see any
difference. You guys may be able to spot something interesting.
Please apply the attached patch. Report what LyX reports on the
stefano franchi wrote:
I patched the file and recompiled. But there is no such line in the
output, either in the console or in the error log
OK, then let's add some more debug code. Look what the attached reports (on
the console).
Jürgen
Index: src/LaTeX.cpp
On 04/27/2011 10:44 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
What is the output if you run "lyx -dbg latex" and view your document?
Jurgen,
all I can figure out from the output is that Lyx realizes there are
undefined references and runs "bibtex". It may be running biber and
the string may be misleading,
Richard Heck wrote:
> Can you try the attached patch? I think we aren't detecting:
>
> LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line: Package biblatex Warning: Please (re)run Biber
> on the file:
> LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line: (biblatex)
> Talk-for-publication-proceedings
> LaTeX.cpp(644): Log line:
stefano franchi wrote:
> Patched as instructed, recompiled, and rerun. Log file is attached. I
> don't know what was supposed to change, if anything. I didn't see any
> difference. You guys may be able to spot something interesting.
Please apply the attached patch. Report what LyX reports on the
stefano franchi wrote:
> I patched the file and recompiled. But there is no such line in the
> output, either in the console or in the error log
OK, then let's add some more debug code. Look what the attached reports (on
the console).
Jürgen
Index: src/LaTeX.cpp
Stefano Franchi wrote:
Are biber and its auxiliary files supposed to be correctly recognized
by lyx 2.0?
Yes, since several weeks,
I cannot get my version of LyX (rev. 38496) to process the
references, even though the same file exported to plain latex compiles
flawlessly from the command
can you start biber from the command line (i.e., biber -v)? If you run LyX
from a terminal, are there any enlightening messages?
biber -v
gives me
biber version: 0.6 (beta)
(not the latest version, I'll admit).
running LyX from terminal does not show anything useful. I use LuaTex
+
stefano franchi wrote:
biber -v
gives me
biber version: 0.6 (beta)
(not the latest version, I'll admit).
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex (and
vice versa).
running LyX from
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
stefano franchi wrote:
biber -v
gives me
biber version: 0.6 (beta)
(not the latest version, I'll admit).
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to
stefano franchi wrote:
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex
(and vice versa).
Yes, I know. I am running biblatex 0.9e
Notice that Lualatex+biber+biblatex work fine (on the exported
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
stefano franchi wrote:
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex
(and vice versa).
Yes, I know. I am running biblatex
stefano franchi wrote:
I don't know when biber switched from bbl (nor could I find out
googling it), but I can confirm that lyx does generate a.bcf file in
its temp dir, and it contains all the ref keys for my citations.
How is this bcf file named? It ought to be named docname.bcf, where
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
stefano franchi wrote:
I don't know when biber switched from bbl (nor could I find out
googling it), but I can confirm that lyx does generate a.bcf file in
its temp dir, and it contains all the ref keys for my citations.
stefano franchi wrote:
It is. My lyx file is
Talk-for-publication-proceedings.lyx
What is the output if you run lyx -dbg latex and view your document?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I have tested biber support only with rather recent releases of biber.
should we write some version to release notes?
pavel
Stefano Franchi wrote:
Are biber and its auxiliary files supposed to be correctly recognized
by lyx 2.0?
Yes, since several weeks,
I cannot get my version of LyX (rev. 38496) to process the
references, even though the same file exported to plain latex compiles
flawlessly from the command
can you start biber from the command line (i.e., biber -v)? If you run LyX
from a terminal, are there any enlightening messages?
biber -v
gives me
biber version: 0.6 (beta)
(not the latest version, I'll admit).
running LyX from terminal does not show anything useful. I use LuaTex
+
stefano franchi wrote:
biber -v
gives me
biber version: 0.6 (beta)
(not the latest version, I'll admit).
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex (and
vice versa).
running LyX from
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
stefano franchi wrote:
biber -v
gives me
biber version: 0.6 (beta)
(not the latest version, I'll admit).
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to
stefano franchi wrote:
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex
(and vice versa).
Yes, I know. I am running biblatex 0.9e
Notice that Lualatex+biber+biblatex work fine (on the exported
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
stefano franchi wrote:
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex
(and vice versa).
Yes, I know. I am running biblatex
stefano franchi wrote:
I don't know when biber switched from bbl (nor could I find out
googling it), but I can confirm that lyx does generate a.bcf file in
its temp dir, and it contains all the ref keys for my citations.
How is this bcf file named? It ought to be named docname.bcf, where
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
stefano franchi wrote:
I don't know when biber switched from bbl (nor could I find out
googling it), but I can confirm that lyx does generate a.bcf file in
its temp dir, and it contains all the ref keys for my citations.
stefano franchi wrote:
It is. My lyx file is
Talk-for-publication-proceedings.lyx
What is the output if you run lyx -dbg latex and view your document?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I have tested biber support only with rather recent releases of biber.
should we write some version to release notes?
pavel
Stefano Franchi wrote:
> Are biber and its auxiliary files supposed to be correctly recognized
> by lyx 2.0?
Yes, since several weeks,
> I cannot get my version of LyX (rev. 38496) to process the
> references, even though the same file exported to plain latex compiles
> flawlessly from the
> can you start biber from the command line (i.e., biber -v)? If you run LyX
> from a terminal, are there any enlightening messages?
>
biber -v
gives me
biber version: 0.6 (beta)
(not the latest version, I'll admit).
running LyX from terminal does not show anything useful. I use LuaTex
+
stefano franchi wrote:
> biber -v
>
> gives me
>
> biber version: 0.6 (beta)
>
> (not the latest version, I'll admit).
What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex (and
vice versa).
> running
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> stefano franchi wrote:
>> biber -v
>>
>> gives me
>>
>> biber version: 0.6 (beta)
>>
>> (not the latest version, I'll admit).
>
> What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
> connected, so you
stefano franchi wrote:
> > What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
> > connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex
> > (and vice versa).
>
> Yes, I know. I am running biblatex 0.9e
> Notice that Lualatex+biber+biblatex work fine (on the
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> stefano franchi wrote:
>> > What version of biblatex? Biblatex and biber releases are very closely
>> > connected, so you usually need to update biber when updating biblatex
>> > (and vice versa).
>>
>> Yes, I know. I am
stefano franchi wrote:
> I don't know when biber switched from bbl (nor could I find out
> googling it), but I can confirm that lyx does generate a.bcf file in
> its temp dir, and it contains all the ref keys for my citations.
How is this bcf file named? It ought to be named .bcf, where
stands
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> stefano franchi wrote:
>> I don't know when biber switched from bbl (nor could I find out
>> googling it), but I can confirm that lyx does generate a.bcf file in
>> its temp dir, and it contains all the ref keys for my
stefano franchi wrote:
> It is. My lyx file is
>
> Talk-for-publication-proceedings.lyx
What is the output if you run "lyx -dbg latex" and view your document?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I have tested biber support only with rather recent releases of biber.
should we write some version to release notes?
pavel
Are biber and its auxiliary files supposed to be correctly recognized
by lyx 2.0? I cannot get my version of LyX (rev. 38496) to process the
references, even though the same file exported to plain latex compiles
flawlessly from the command line. I see from the tracker that Jurgen
fixed this
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
On 04/25/2011 04:47 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote:
Is there any sort of error message associated with this if you run from the
terminal? or is biber just not being called at all?
No error message in the terminal. It looks
Are biber and its auxiliary files supposed to be correctly recognized
by lyx 2.0? I cannot get my version of LyX (rev. 38496) to process the
references, even though the same file exported to plain latex compiles
flawlessly from the command line. I see from the tracker that Jurgen
fixed this
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
On 04/25/2011 04:47 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote:
Is there any sort of error message associated with this if you run from the
terminal? or is biber just not being called at all?
No error message in the terminal. It looks
Are biber and its auxiliary files supposed to be correctly recognized
by lyx 2.0? I cannot get my version of LyX (rev. 38496) to process the
references, even though the same file exported to plain latex compiles
flawlessly from the command line. I see from the tracker that Jurgen
fixed this
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 04:47 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote:
> Is there any sort of error message associated with this if you run from the
> terminal? or is biber just not being called at all?
No error message in the terminal. It
63 matches
Mail list logo