Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Kamil Anis
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:55:07PM +, John Levon wrote: Can you please reply to the list too ? Of course I can. By the way I subscribed the lyx-users mailing list and got no reply whether my subscription was successfull or not. I've tried to send an (empty) email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Kamil Anis
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:05:56PM +, John Levon wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:50:02PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: The problem is that the words in Spellchecker dialog namely in Unknown: and Replacement: are displayed right with diacritic marks while the words in the Suggestions: box

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:12:47PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: Of course I can. By the way I subscribed the lyx-users mailing list and got no reply whether my subscription was successfull or not. I've tried to send an (empty) email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and got nothing. So I do Cc: lyx-users :-)

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Matej Cepl
Kamil Anis wrote: I don't think so. I had no troubles with spellchecking in 1.2.x. So this either LyX or Qt problem. Note that me and people from my nbhood use Qt: 3.0.5 KDE: 3.0.3-8 Red Hat KDesktop: v1.9.8 OK, it is the same problem here (and the same language). See attached, what I

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Kamil Anis
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:55:07PM +, John Levon wrote: Can you please reply to the list too ? Of course I can. By the way I subscribed the lyx-users mailing list and got no reply whether my subscription was successfull or not. I've tried to send an (empty) email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Kamil Anis
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:05:56PM +, John Levon wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:50:02PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: The problem is that the words in Spellchecker dialog namely in Unknown: and Replacement: are displayed right with diacritic marks while the words in the Suggestions: box

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:12:47PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: Of course I can. By the way I subscribed the lyx-users mailing list and got no reply whether my subscription was successfull or not. I've tried to send an (empty) email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and got nothing. So I do Cc: lyx-users :-)

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Matej Cepl
Kamil Anis wrote: I don't think so. I had no troubles with spellchecking in 1.2.x. So this either LyX or Qt problem. Note that me and people from my nbhood use Qt: 3.0.5 KDE: 3.0.3-8 Red Hat KDesktop: v1.9.8 OK, it is the same problem here (and the same language). See attached, what I

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Kamil Anis
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:55:07PM +, John Levon wrote: > > Can you please reply to the list too ? Of course I can. By the way I subscribed the lyx-users mailing list and got no reply whether my subscription was successfull or not. I've tried to send an (empty) email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Kamil Anis
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:05:56PM +, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:50:02PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: > > > The problem is that the words in Spellchecker dialog namely in Unknown: > > and Replacement: are displayed right with diacritic marks while the > > words in the

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:12:47PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: > Of course I can. By the way I subscribed the lyx-users mailing list and > got no reply whether my subscription was successfull or not. I've tried > to send an (empty) email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and got nothing. > So I do Cc: lyx-users

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-20 Thread Matej Cepl
Kamil Anis wrote: > I don't think so. I had no troubles with spellchecking in 1.2.x. So this > either LyX or Qt problem. Note that me and people from my nbhood use > > Qt: 3.0.5 > KDE: 3.0.3-8 Red Hat > KDesktop: v1.9.8 OK, it is the same problem here (and the same language). See attached, what

spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-17 Thread Kamil Anis
Hello, I really enjoy LyX 1.3.0 for Qt/RH8.0, but I have problem to spell iso8859-2 encoded documents -- namely Czech. I have the following stuff in my ~./lyx/preferences # SPELLCHECKER SECTION ## \accept_compound true \use_escape_chars true \escape_chars

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-17 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:53:22PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: and it seems that LyX doesn't worry about that. The spellchecker behaves as the option \escape_chars ... was not set. aspell --help : The following options will be ignored for compatabilty with ispell: -m -n -P -S -w ARG -T ARG

spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-17 Thread Kamil Anis
Hello, I really enjoy LyX 1.3.0 for Qt/RH8.0, but I have problem to spell iso8859-2 encoded documents -- namely Czech. I have the following stuff in my ~./lyx/preferences # SPELLCHECKER SECTION ## \accept_compound true \use_escape_chars true \escape_chars

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-17 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:53:22PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: and it seems that LyX doesn't worry about that. The spellchecker behaves as the option \escape_chars ... was not set. aspell --help : The following options will be ignored for compatabilty with ispell: -m -n -P -S -w ARG -T ARG

spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-17 Thread Kamil Anis
Hello, I really enjoy LyX 1.3.0 for Qt/RH8.0, but I have problem to spell iso8859-2 encoded documents -- namely Czech. I have the following stuff in my ~./lyx/preferences # SPELLCHECKER SECTION ## \accept_compound true \use_escape_chars true \escape_chars

Re: spellchecking in LyX 1.3.0 for Qt

2003-02-17 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:53:22PM -0500, Kamil Anis wrote: > and it seems that LyX doesn't worry about that. The spellchecker behaves > as the option \escape_chars "..." was not set. aspell --help : The following options will be ignored for compatabilty with ispell: -m -n -P -S -w ARG -T ARG