Re: Chicago Manual reference in footnote with bibtex?
John Kane wrote: > Is there any relatively simple way to implement the Chicago Manual of > Style's full reference in a footnote style? You should use BibLaTeX with the Chicago style https://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-chicago > > I saw a reference to \footcite in LaTex but a) it's not clear to me how to > use it even in LaTeX and there was a note in the LyX wiki implying that it > was not implemented in LyX. \footcite is a macro that creates a footnote and insert the citation. For LyX, just manually create the footnote and then insert your citation. C.
Re: Chicago Manual reference in footnote with bibtex?
Thank you Charles. I was afraid that I would have to use biblatex. I never seem to get it to work properly but I'll try again. On 12 September 2016 at 05:02, Charles de Miramon < charlesdemira...@gmail.com> wrote: > John Kane wrote: > > > Is there any relatively simple way to implement the Chicago Manual of > > Style's full reference in a footnote style? > > You should use BibLaTeX with the Chicago style > > https://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-chicago > > > > > I saw a reference to \footcite in LaTex but a) it's not clear to me how > to > > use it even in LaTeX and there was a note in the LyX wiki implying that > it > > was not implemented in LyX. > > \footcite is a macro that creates a footnote and insert the citation. > > For LyX, just manually create the footnote and then insert your citation. > > C. > > > -- John Kane Kingston ON Canada
How to collaborate with you
Hi, I am contacting you on behalf of my current client, a binary options company. I would like to know which is the minimum amount of money we need to donate in order to appear as a supporter/sponsor of your project (name of the company + link)? Looking forward to your reply. Best thoughts, Emily
Re: problem with creating layout file for some class
Thanks, now it seems everything works more or less correctly. Leslaw > Sorry, I hadn't realized that you were using 2.0.x, so I used layout > commands that are only valid in later versions. Use the attached. > > Richard