Todd Denniston wrote:
I agree, Paul. The reply address should be occupied by the list's address.
I could agree ... if I had not seen the problems it can cause.
example: the MUSCLE list (smart cards)
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
First: to me this breaks the rule of
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:32:06PM +0100, Paul wrote:
My experience of lists is that 99% of the time I want to reply to the
whole list, so it makes sense to me to have that as the default.
If someone really decides to make the change, please set the rewriter to put
both the originator and
Todd Denniston wrote:
I agree, Paul. The reply address should be occupied by the list's address.
I could agree ... if I had not seen the problems it can cause.
example: the MUSCLE list (smart cards)
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
First: to me this breaks the rule of
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:32:06PM +0100, Paul wrote:
My experience of lists is that 99% of the time I want to reply to the
whole list, so it makes sense to me to have that as the default.
If someone really decides to make the change, please set the rewriter to put
both the originator and
Todd Denniston wrote:
>>I agree, Paul. The reply address should be occupied by the list's address.
>
> I could agree ... if I had not seen the problems it can cause.
> example: the MUSCLE list (smart cards)
> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
>
> First: to me this breaks the rule
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:32:06PM +0100, Paul wrote:
> My experience of lists is that 99% of the time I want to reply to the
> whole list, so it makes sense to me to have that as the default.
>
> > If someone really decides to make the change, please set the rewriter to put
> > both the