Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-21 Thread mamato
there's what i would call an off-by-one weirdness with the numbering parameter... the meaning of those numbers are in the doc somewhere. try -1... personnally i have a similar but more complicated pb. i use numbering but would like to not use them for introductions/conclusions... if i

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-21 Thread mamato
there's what i would call an off-by-one weirdness with the numbering parameter... the meaning of those numbers are in the doc somewhere. try -1... personnally i have a similar but more complicated pb. i use numbering but would like to not use them for introductions/conclusions... if i

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-21 Thread mamato
there's what i would call an off-by-one weirdness with the numbering parameter... the meaning of those numbers are in the doc somewhere. try -1... personnally i have a similar but more complicated pb. i use numbering but would like to not use them for introductions/conclusions... if i

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-20 Thread Steve Litt
On Sunday 18 December 2005 05:02 am, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and   is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long.   I try to reduce hard impact in readers.   Because my book have a cronological structural,

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-20 Thread Steve Litt
On Sunday 18 December 2005 05:02 am, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and   is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long.   I try to reduce hard impact in readers.   Because my book have a cronological structural,

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-20 Thread Steve Litt
On Sunday 18 December 2005 05:02 am, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: > > For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and > >   is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long. > >   I try to reduce hard impact in readers. > >   Because my book have a cronological

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-18 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and   is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long.   I try to reduce hard impact in readers.   Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers   of section no add useful information for readers but  

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-18 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and   is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long.   I try to reduce hard impact in readers.   Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers   of section no add useful information for readers but  

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-18 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: > For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and >   is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long. >   I try to reduce hard impact in readers. >   Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers >   of section no add useful information for readers but >

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: How I can get sections* and Navigate Menu. I think it's not possible, but it would be definitely desirable. Cf. http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1982 Jürgen

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Why do you want to have Section*? For the numbering? JMarc

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
Why do you want to have Section*? For the numbering? JMarc For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long. I try to reduce hard impact in readers. Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers of section no add

Re: I lost a very useful feature (more)

2005-12-17 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
Why do you want to have Section*? For the numbering? JMarc For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long. I try to reduce hard impact in readers. Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers of section no add useful

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: How I can get sections* and Navigate Menu. I think it's not possible, but it would be definitely desirable. Cf. http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1982 Jürgen

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Why do you want to have Section*? For the numbering? JMarc

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
Why do you want to have Section*? For the numbering? JMarc For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long. I try to reduce hard impact in readers. Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers of section no add

Re: I lost a very useful feature (more)

2005-12-17 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
Why do you want to have Section*? For the numbering? JMarc For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long. I try to reduce hard impact in readers. Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers of section no add useful

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Marcelo Acuÿf1a wrote: > How I can get sections* and Navigate Menu. I think it's not possible, but it would be definitely desirable. Cf. http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1982 Jürgen

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Why do you want to have Section*? For the numbering? JMarc

Re: I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-17 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
>>Why do you want to have Section*? >>For the numbering? >> >>JMarc For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long. I try to reduce hard impact in readers. Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers of section no

Re: I lost a very useful feature (more)

2005-12-17 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
>>Why do you want to have Section*? >>For the numbering? >> >>JMarc >For aesthetic and legibility. My book is on history and >is plenty of dates, numbers, and is very long. >I try to reduce hard impact in readers. >Because my book have a cronological structural, numbers >of section no add

I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-16 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
Hello, I writing a book with Koma-script style. I have more of one-hundred sections in several chapters. I decided to have section*, no section. I make all changes and I lost title of sections* in Navigate Menu, a very useful feature while the author is writing. How I can get

I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-16 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
Hello, I writing a book with Koma-script style. I have more of one-hundred sections in several chapters. I decided to have section*, no section. I make all changes and I lost title of sections* in Navigate Menu, a very useful feature while the author is writing. How I can get

I lost a very useful feature

2005-12-16 Thread Marcelo Acuÿfffff1a
Hello, I writing a book with Koma-script style. I have more of one-hundred sections in several chapters. I decided to have section*, no section. I make all changes and I lost title of sections* in Navigate Menu, a very useful feature while the author is writing. How I can get