Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-25 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 24.06.2016, 21:03 +0100 schrieb Guillaume Munch: > Oh snap! It's a stopper. Then, I guess that I will have to keep > beamer-flex for myself. It is indeed not acceptable to provide an > alternative that fails to reach the perfection of the current beamer > class. I did not state

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-24 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 22/06/2016 08:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : 2016-06-21 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Munch >: Yes, something would have to be done about this: a combo box, or an automatic toolbar. But I think this is a more general issue with custom insets, not

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2016-06-21 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Munch : > Yes, something would have to be done about this: a combo box, or an > automatic toolbar. But I think this is a more general issue with custom > insets, not specific to beamer-flex. > Yes, but it's a stopper for beamer-flex. Frames are

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-21 Thread Richard Heck
For what it's worth, I like a mixed approach. Things like "Overlay Area" seem to me natural as insets. Frames I like more as styles. But this may be an individual thing. Richard On 06/21/2016 10:44 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > > Le 19/06/2016 13:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-21 Thread Guillaume Munch
Hi Jürgen, Le 19/06/2016 13:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Freitag, den 10.06.2016, 11:11 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: Can I make it a bit more accessible and not hidden under custom insets? This is a major design flaw of this approach, IMHO. Yes, something would have to be done about

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-19 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 10.06.2016, 11:11 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: > > Can I make it a bit more accessible and not hidden under custom > > insets? This is a major design flaw of this approach, IMHO. > > There is an enhancement request for this sort of thing: a combo box, > like for layouts, that

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-12 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 12/06/2016 09:42, UD a écrit : Could you re-provide teh information about the custom inset that was posted hhere? I missed it, and would love to use beamer via lyx. Thanks, E. Kaplan See the discussion from April, at http://mid.gmane.org/nek3qi$l77$1...@ger.gmane.org

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-12 Thread UD
Could you re-provide teh information about the custom inset that was posted hhere?  I missed it, and would love to use beamer via lyx. Thanks, E. Kaplan On 06/10/2016 01:11 PM, Neal Becker wrote: Guillaume Munch wrote: Le

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-10 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/10/2016 07:11 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> Le 09/06/2016 12:25, Neal Becker a écrit : >>> I'm enjoying using the beamer custom inset that was posted here. I'd >>> like to see this as the standard method for supporting beamer frames on >>> lyx going forward. >>> >>>

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-10 Thread Neal Becker
Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 09/06/2016 12:25, Neal Becker a écrit : >> I'm enjoying using the beamer custom inset that was posted here. I'd >> like to see this as the standard method for supporting beamer frames on >> lyx going forward. >> >> > > Thanks for the feedback. The easiest would be to

Re: cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-09 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 09/06/2016 12:25, Neal Becker a écrit : I'm enjoying using the beamer custom inset that was posted here. I'd like to see this as the standard method for supporting beamer frames on lyx going forward. Thanks for the feedback. The easiest would be to offer it as a separate layout and not

cudos for beamer-flx.lyx

2016-06-09 Thread Neal Becker
I'm enjoying using the beamer custom inset that was posted here. I'd like to see this as the standard method for supporting beamer frames on lyx going forward.