[mac] Intel VS PPC

2009-10-25 Thread Gallomimia
New to this list. I should certainly read through some of the archives but I had an issue come up recently that is going to spark this question in my mind, which leads to my fingers, which leads to this email which leads to this list. First of all, why are there separate versions of OOo for PPC

Re: [mac] Intel VS PPC

2009-10-25 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Gallomimia gallomi...@gmail.com wrote: First of all, why are there separate versions of OOo for PPC and Intel macs? Can't a Universal Binary be created? Yes. The universal binary would * be huge to download * very tricky to build in the first place (OOo

Re: [mac] Intel VS PPC

2009-10-25 Thread Gallomimia
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Christian Lohmaier cl...@openoffice.org wrote: Hi *, On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Gallomimia gallomi...@gmail.com wrote: First of all, why are there separate versions of OOo for PPC and Intel macs? Can't a Universal Binary be created? Yes. The

Re: [mac] Intel VS PPC

2009-10-25 Thread Uwe Altmann
Hi Gallomimia schrieb: Am I to understand that each and every language, on each and every architecture, requires a separate tester for each and every release? Basically yes. In fact there are some release candidates too :-) Sometimes we can do some short tests only for platform or language

Re: [mac] Intel VS PPC

2009-10-25 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Gallomimia gallomi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Christian Lohmaier cl...@openoffice.org wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Gallomimia gallomi...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Why is the version 3.1.1 not at release status for PPC