On 18/09/2014 20:22, Hendrik Schreiber wrote:
On Sep 18, 2014, at 20:49, Paul Taylor paul_t...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 18/09/2014 18:16, Danno Ferrin wrote:
On the javapacakger (javafxpackager) side of the house we dodge this by not
using the symlinked JLI.
The JDK as it is installed installs
On the javapacakger (javafxpackager) side of the house we dodge this by not
using the symlinked JLI.
The JDK as it is installed installs a symlink to the libjli.dylib in
...app/Contents/MacOS is actually a symlink. I don't know if you copy it if it
will still work, it may want to live in
On 18/09/2014 18:16, Danno Ferrin wrote:
On the javapacakger (javafxpackager) side of the house we dodge this by not
using the symlinked JLI.
The JDK as it is installed installs a symlink to the libjli.dylib in
...app/Contents/MacOS is actually a symlink. I don't know if you copy it if it