On Oct 10, 2008, at 14:31, Darren Weber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:16:08PM -0700, rhubbell said:
Probably a ridiculous question. (never stopped me before)
Is macports always and forever dependent upon Xcode?
Can it be
On Oct 11, 2008, at 00:57, Daniel Amiguet wrote on macports-changes:
please change my address [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the new one
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're talking about your MacPorts mailing list subscriptions,
you'll have to change the email address yourself. Please see the
pages for
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
As long as MacPorts builds ports from source, then Xcode is an
absolute
requirement (for gcc etc). If the day comes that MacPorts
distributes
binary packages, then Xcode may only be needed by some ports and not
MacPorts as a whole.
As a guess, the macports
nox wrote:
One reason could be to keep MacPorts fully self-contained,
and to cut down on the amount of outside dependencies... ?
Currently there is a big grey zone of what's ok to use from
system (GCC, X11, etc) and what is not (Perl, Python, etc)
I really don't want to have to build or use
Citando Jay Levitt :
Anders F Björklund wrote:
nox wrote:
One reason could be to keep MacPorts fully self-contained,
and to cut down on the amount of outside dependencies... ?
Currently there is a big grey zone of what's ok to use from
system (GCC, X11, etc) and what is not (Perl,
Le 11 oct. 08 à 09:54, Anders F Björklund a écrit :
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
As long as MacPorts builds ports from source, then Xcode is an
absolute
requirement (for gcc etc). If the day comes that MacPorts
distributes
binary packages, then Xcode may only be needed by some ports and
not
Anders F Björklund wrote:
nox wrote:
One reason could be to keep MacPorts fully self-contained,
and to cut down on the amount of outside dependencies... ?
Currently there is a big grey zone of what's ok to use from
system (GCC, X11, etc) and what is not (Perl, Python, etc)
I really don't
On Oct 11, 2008, at 07:50, Emmanuel Hainry wrote:
Another factor (though I think we're just discussing philosphy, not
immediate plans): Every port maintainer and core developer uses
Xcode.
Such a statement had to have an exception: I no longer use Xcode as my
powerbook is now dead. I use
I had gimp-jp2 0.1_0 installed and just did the upgrade to 2.2.0_0. I
got an odd error and I am not sure if it is port error related to jp2
or a more general error related to MacPorts.
The odd thing is that the upgrade seemed to work, so I am not sure
exactly what the error means, or if I
error in variants gimp-user-manual:
DEBUG: gimp-user-manual 2.4.2_0 exists in the ports tree
DEBUG: gimp-user-manual 0.13_0 is installed
DEBUG: Not following dependencies
DEBUG: variants to install {} fetch
DEBUG: available variants are : universal fetch build without_gimp cs
de en es fr hr it
On Oct 12, 2008, at 12:20 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
I had gimp-jp2 0.1_0 installed and just did the upgrade to 2.2.0_0. I
got an odd error and I am not sure if it is port error related to jp2
or a more general error related to MacPorts.
The odd thing is that the upgrade seemed to work, so
On Oct 11, 2008, at 9:54 PM, William Davis wrote:
On Oct 12, 2008, at 12:20 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
I had gimp-jp2 0.1_0 installed and just did the upgrade to
2.2.0_0. I
got an odd error and I am not sure if it is port error related to jp2
or a more general error related to
12 matches
Mail list logo
